Flywheel devices

[Temporal Visitor]

Following the link leads to this post by you:
Pounds are weight, not mass.  The English unit for mass is the slug.Torque and energy are independent properties.  You may be confusing lb. ft. and ft. lbs.  A foot pound is a unit of work described as:  One pound of force applied through one foot distance.  A pound foot is a unit of torque expressed as one pound of force applied tangentially at a distance from the pivot of one foot.HP/s are completely non-sensical units of energy per second per second.
Garbage In => Garbage Out

Hello again,
Thanks for posting all you have, just so you "know" I enjoyed reading the PRB site. Nice find! Even had some real "nuggets of truth".

"Pounds are weight, not mass.  The English unit for mass is the slug." = OK so what? I know that as well. Big deal. The calculator was written for me, not for you. It is my unlocked OPEN SOURCE work given as a gift. - If you wish to use "Slugs" change it to suit yourself to whatever your mind works best with.

"Torque and energy are independent properties." = OK so what? I know that as well. Big deal. Evidenced by the fact the calculator displays them separately, and uses the outputs in the proper place correctly.

"You may be confusing lb. ft. and ft. lbs.  A foot pound is a unit of work described as:  One pound of force applied through one foot distance.  A pound foot is a unit of torque expressed as one pound of force applied tangentially at a distance from the pivot of one foot." = OK so what? I know that as well. Big deal. I won't pick on you for not being certain where you have written "You may be" which shows you DO NOT KNOW, therefore I WILL WAIT FOR YOU TO CATCH UP. But please be quick and by all means take the time to read what is explained very clearly regarding this exact matter in my work you have copied and pasted for discussion.
Me, myself, and I: "we" are all certain, beyond any doubt thus not "confused" the calculations are quite "write". (humor intended)

"HP/s are completely non-sensical units of energy per second per second." = A twist from your mind/hand. My writing "Horsepower per second" does not mean what you and others attempt to claim: HP/s. Therefore I agree, your twist: HP/s is non-sense, and it originates in your mind/hand, NOT MINE!

You are CON-fusing POWER (Horsepower) with ENERGY. - I am not.

As for "Garbage In => Garbage Out"

You can surely write or say whatever you please but none of it will change the truth of the mathematics. That is a fact you nor I can get around in reality.

[Temporal Visitor]

"Truth requires few words." That's why your posts and website are packed with words...

Let's see you do better.

[Temporal Visitor]

I wish to thank all the participants in showing temporal your support for his work.

I will now ask you to remain on the original topic.

You still can:
"Excuse yourself and I will leave you as I found you: in the dark."

[MarkE]

Hello again,
Thanks for posting all you have, just so you "know" I enjoyed reading the PRB site. Nice find! Even had some real "nuggets of truth".

"Pounds are weight, not mass.  The English unit for mass is the slug." = OK so what? I know that as well. Big deal.

Yet you erroneously treated weight as mass.  If you knew the difference, then why did you do that?

The calculator was written for me, not for you. It is my unlocked OPEN SOURCE work given as a gift. - If you wish to use "Slugs" change it to suit yourself to whatever your mind works best with.

Do you mean if I want to fix your mistakes I should do that?  But then what?  Do we stick with your erroneous postulates based on your erroneous formulae?

"Torque and energy are independent properties." = OK so what? I know that as well. Big deal. Evidenced by the fact the calculator displays them separately, and uses the outputs in the proper place correctly.

Again, if you knew then why did you offer the false equivalencies?  Are you saying that you have deliberately misrepresented very simple physics?

"You may be confusing lb. ft. and ft. lbs.  A foot pound is a unit of work described as:  One pound of force applied through one foot distance.  A pound foot is a unit of torque expressed as one pound of force applied tangentially at a distance from the pivot of one foot." = OK so what? I know that as well. Big deal. I won't pick on you for not being certain where you have written "You may be" which shows you DO NOT KNOW, therefore I WILL WAIT FOR YOU TO CATCH UP. But please be quick and by all means take the time to read what is explained very clearly regarding this exact matter in my work you have copied and pasted for discussion.
Me, myself, and I: "we" are all certain, beyond any doubt thus not "confused" the calculations are quite "write". (humor intended)

Your humor may be inteded but your formulae are junk.

"HP/s are completely non-sensical units of energy per second per second." = A twist from your mind/hand. My writing "Horsepower per second" does not mean what you and others attempt to claim: HP/s. Therefore I agree, your twist: HP/s is non-sense, and it originates in your mind/hand, NOT MINE!

Yet it is your concoction.

You are CON-fusing POWER (Horsepower) with ENERGY. - I am not.

As for "Garbage In => Garbage Out"

You can surely write or say whatever you please but none of it will change the truth of the mathematics. That is a fact you nor I can get around in reality.

You asserted a series of incorrect fomulae.  Now you claim they generate valid results.  That is pure delusion.

[Temporal Visitor]

Yet you erroneously treated weight as mass.  If you knew the difference, then why did you do that?Do you mean if I want to fix your mistakes I should do that?  But then what?  Do we stick with your erroneous postulates based on your erroneous formulae?Again, if you knew then why did you offer the false equivalencies?  Are you saying that you have deliberately misrepresented very simple physics?Your humor may be inteded but your formulae are junk.Yet it is your concoction.You asserted a series of incorrect fomulae.  Now you claim they generate valid results.  That is pure delusion.

"Yet you erroneously treated weight as mass. " = Another invalid assertion by you.

The calculator is written to "calculate", and does so. The mass is "CALCULATED" FROM DIAMETER, WIDTH, thus VOLUME, by, along with the objects DENSITY and shows the output in units the real world Man can relate to. Quite correctly.

Evidenced in my writing: "OUTPUT - Mass (weight pounds) displayed in A7 .... =SUM(C6)*0.28333333 [~ Cubic inches x density lb/in^3 ~]"

That single point (evidences your invalid assertion) all by itself refutes and renders the rest of your assertions, and questions entirely baseless.

To help you CATCH UP I suggest you re-read my work before injecting your CON-fused commentary. Also you may find this: http://serc.carleton.edu/mathyouneed/density/index.html instructive.

"You can surely write or say whatever you please but none of it will change the truth of the mathematics. That is a fact you nor I can get around in reality. "