Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Andrea Rossi Vindicated? Cold Fusion Takes Another Step Towards Credibility

Started by rukiddingme, February 28, 2015, 09:47:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

So far this looks like very good work and makes all the nonsense from: Rossi, Levy et-al, and Parkhomov sad jokes by comparison.  Your attention to setting up a consistent and reliable basis of comparison between a null control and the unit under test is what everyone who wishes to perform a meaningful experiment should do, but sadly many do not. 

profitis

Vortex1:' I have a container design that will satisfy the problem.'

make sure that the material composition of this container is 100% impermeable at elevated temps.an easier option might be to try detect anomalies in an electroysis cell with lithium salt shoved in sol?

Vortex1

Quote from: MarkE on March 02, 2015, 01:30:07 PM
So far this looks like very good work and makes all the nonsense from: Rossi, Levy et-al, and Parkhomov sad jokes by comparison.  Your attention to setting up a consistent and reliable basis of comparison between a null control and the unit under test is what everyone who wishes to perform a meaningful experiment should do, but sadly many do not.

Thanks for the kind support, MarkE

There are many enhancements that I have not yet pursued, such as monitoring heater currents and automatic trimming to insure current balance during characterization and run time, but was able to get very close initial results just by hand trimming the turns count on the heaters.

With the loss to ambient method at such high temperatures, water calorimetry is really not necessary, and can always be done later, after the proof of concept is established.

This particular photo is an early heater test, running open loop under manual control, just to test the approximate heater size needed.

profitis

Other option is the bomb method ala blacklightpower inc with their NaH/Ni.simpler the better I always say

Vortex1

Quote from: profitis on March 02, 2015, 01:49:30 PM
Other option is the bomb method ala blacklightpower inc with their NaH/Ni.simpler the better I always say

Yes a simple heater and thermocouple assembly, can be run safely at a distance, just bring it up to temperature, let it cook a while then cut the power. The rate of fall will tell all (compared to the dummy ballistic from an earlier run). I like the simpler methods, but had all the stuff to build the "control" so why not run them together.

Do you have a link to the blacklight power work?