Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


The first ever photograph of light as a particle and a wave

Started by synchro1, March 04, 2015, 01:08:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

synchro1

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on March 05, 2015, 12:16:04 AM


100% PURE BS


the MEASURING instrumentation are picking up electrostatic pulses from the Z axis radial dielectric nature of light.


The "quantum packet" BS of "particle and wave" or  "wave particle duality" BS is just a brain fart misunderstanding of what LIGHT IS.




this is typical horseshit from the cult of quantum nonsense.

@TheoriaApophasis,

Your're a pretty bold Little prick!

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: synchro1 on March 05, 2015, 12:19:35 AM
Your're a pretty bold Little prick!


worthless ad hominem,    has no bearing on the subject of your posting.


Definitionally, a "PRICK" would be someone WITHOUT an intelligent rebuttal, or a logical statement in SUPPORT of their EARLIER CLAIM



in which case, you fit that parameter 100%





That light has 2 modes of reciprocation and three components is specifically the basis of the "wave-particle duality" (in reality an
electromagnetic and dielectric radial-dimensional co-axial geometry) as wrongly propounded by GR and Quantum. Two transverse E
and M polarizations with dimensionality and a dielectric radial component, which is the electromagnetic-fulcrum upon which
electricity and magnetism conjugate thru and against.


The nonsense of "wave-particle duality" from Quantum mysticism is a fallacy; light creates interference fringes due to constructive or
destructive phasing from the dielectric additive or destructive polarization, or "light on light".


While magnetism is geometric and spatial, electricity and dielectricity are counterspatial (however the electrical component is
polarized). The quasi-matter of E.M. has the dielectric as the counterspatial Z-axis or ray around which electricity and magnetism
reciprocate thru mutual induction and capacitance upon and rebounding against the dielectric. There are no photons, this inductocapacitant
electro-magnetic form, or E.M. accounts for the misunderstanding of wave-particle 'duality' (rather sheer ignorance) and
countless other unique attributes of T.E.M.


Light is not a material emanation or projection, rather sheer induction containing 2 axial and 1 radial components. By true definition,
the very nature of all electromagnetism is a wheel, as is the co-axial geometry of same. Spatial electrical and magnetic components,
induce each other THRU, as is necessitated, the counterspatial dielectric center axial and radial point. Linear and circular polarization
alike.
Magnetic lines of induction cannot terminate in space nor can dielectric ones. The radial axle of the geometry of light is absolutely
necessitated, it cannot exist in any other way, and certainly not the "self-conjugating and self-capacitance" conceptions as currently
exist about electromagnetism. The claim that EM is "self-conjugating and inducing self-capacitance" is to claim your car engine
pistons are reciprocating upon nothing, no crankshaft of mutual inductive rebounding reciprocation. This is both illogical and
impossible. Countless phenomena, including the so-called "photo-electric" (really the radial-dielectric) effect proves this to be the
case. As mentioned before, electricity can only induce or terminate into or as magnetism thru dielectricity.


BELOW: The missing secret of light is now, for the first time ever, rationally exposed, deconstructed, and unites every
phenomena known to exist around and regarding light. This explains the supposed "wave particle duality", it explains the
Faraday effect, it explains the photo-electric effect, explains the manner by which light can be twisted by magnetic fields,
explains why light can be deflected by extremely strong centripetal gravitational fields. The idiot Einstein said: "We are faced
with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately (particle and wave theory) neither of them
fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do." The 'photon' is a purely arbitrary concept. Einstein wrongly
concluded light was a discrete wave-packet. He called such a wave-packet a 'light quanta'. Light, in fact, is D.E.M (dielectroelectromagnetic),
a tri-fold circuit. The fundamental mass particle itself being a dielectric accretion formed in galactic
formations, it is no coincidence whatsoever that light, like an atom itself, has dualistic properties of both waves and a beam of
elements.





You forgot, IN YOUR IGNORANCE, to mention that the "measure" of said "particle" is in FACT ELECTRICAL in nature,....... the bs particle you think is the PHOTON, has no CHARGE to be measured ELECTRICALLY   (idiot)

.......... as such, the quantum PREMISE is in ERR   ;D ;D ;D ;D

synchro1

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on March 05, 2015, 12:22:36 AM

worthless ad hominem,    has no bearing on the subject of your posting.


Definitionally, a "PRICK" would be someone WITHOUT an intelligent rebuttal, or a logical statement in SUPPORT of their EARLIER CLAIM



in which case, you fit that parameter 100%





That light has 2 modes of reciprocation and three components is specifically the basis of the "wave-particle duality" (in reality an
electromagnetic and dielectric radial-dimensional co-axial geometry) as wrongly propounded by GR and Quantum. Two transverse E
and M polarizations with dimensionality and a dielectric radial component, which is the electromagnetic-fulcrum upon which
electricity and magnetism conjugate thru and against.


The nonsense of "wave-particle duality" from Quantum mysticism is a fallacy; light creates interference fringes due to constructive or
destructive phasing from the dielectric additive or destructive polarization, or "light on light".


While magnetism is geometric and spatial, electricity and dielectricity are counterspatial (however the electrical component is
polarized). The quasi-matter of E.M. has the dielectric as the counterspatial Z-axis or ray around which electricity and magnetism
reciprocate thru mutual induction and capacitance upon and rebounding against the dielectric. There are no photons, this inductocapacitant
electro-magnetic form, or E.M. accounts for the misunderstanding of wave-particle 'duality' (rather sheer ignorance) and
countless other unique attributes of T.E.M.


Light is not a material emanation or projection, rather sheer induction containing 2 axial and 1 radial components. By true definition,
the very nature of all electromagnetism is a wheel, as is the co-axial geometry of same. Spatial electrical and magnetic components,
induce each other THRU, as is necessitated, the counterspatial dielectric center axial and radial point. Linear and circular polarization
alike.
Magnetic lines of induction cannot terminate in space nor can dielectric ones. The radial axle of the geometry of light is absolutely
necessitated, it cannot exist in any other way, and certainly not the "self-conjugating and self-capacitance" conceptions as currently
exist about electromagnetism. The claim that EM is "self-conjugating and inducing self-capacitance" is to claim your car engine
pistons are reciprocating upon nothing, no crankshaft of mutual inductive rebounding reciprocation. This is both illogical and
impossible. Countless phenomena, including the so-called "photo-electric" (really the radial-dielectric) effect proves this to be the
case. As mentioned before, electricity can only induce or terminate into or as magnetism thru dielectricity.


BELOW: The missing secret of light is now, for the first time ever, rationally exposed, deconstructed, and unites every
phenomena known to exist around and regarding light. This explains the supposed "wave particle duality", it explains the
Faraday effect, it explains the photo-electric effect, explains the manner by which light can be twisted by magnetic fields,
explains why light can be deflected by extremely strong centripetal gravitational fields. The idiot Einstein said: "We are faced
with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately (particle and wave theory) neither of them
fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do." The 'photon' is a purely arbitrary concept. Einstein wrongly
concluded light was a discrete wave-packet. He called such a wave-packet a 'light quanta'. Light, in fact, is D.E.M (dielectroelectromagnetic),
a tri-fold circuit. The fundamental mass particle itself being a dielectric accretion formed in galactic
formations, it is no coincidence whatsoever that light, like an atom itself, has dualistic properties of both waves and a beam of
elements.





You forgot, IN YOUR IGNORANCE, to mention that the "measure" of said "particle" is in FACT ELECTRICAL in nature,....... the bs particle you think is the PHOTON, has no CHARGE to be measured ELECTRICALLY   (idiot)

.......... as such, the quantum PREMISE is in ERR   ;D ;D ;D ;D

That's just a bunch of shit you copied to look Smart!

synchro1

Sept. 27, 2014

David Bohm suggested DeBroglie's "Pilot Wave" could control the motion of particles much like the grid in a triode tube could control a large amount of electrons with very little energy spent in the grid itself. This is in his book "The Undivided Universe". Anyway, I see a parallel in quantum mechanics to the General Theory of Relativity wherein a "field" tells matter how to move. In the General Theory of Relativity, Mass-energy tells space-time how to bend and then bent space-time tells matter how to move. In quantum fields, the probability wave does the same trick. It guides the particle by establishing its most likely location in space and time.

Again, much like the big argument over whether light was a particle or a wave, it seems to me there may be more similarities to Quantum mechanics and General Relativity than there are differences. The lack of a proper method of resolving  the measurement  methodology in both cases may be the real difference.

Respectfully,
Jerry E. Bayles  (Quantum Mechanic)

"This experiment demonstrates that, for the first time ever, we can film quantum mechanics - and its paradoxical nature - directly," says Fabrizio Carbone.


TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: synchro1 on March 05, 2015, 12:29:38 AM
That's just a bunch of shit you copied to look Smart!

Idiot you just gave ME a compliment


i copied it from MY OWN BOOK


which I WROTE




thanks for the compliment   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D