Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

[ramset]

heat power....
well I was in Building 7 many times during its construction for testing
I worked with the fire proofer for building seven Too [attaching and wrapping beams and columns
with wire lathe to help hold the sprayed on fireproofing.

I have to say most buildings that I worked in or around [mostly new construction]
had run of the mill columns beams etc etc ,Building seven was built out of iron
with dimensions that were stupendous..quite extraordinary ,especially the lower levels.

funny how crosswalks over the street remained intact and the whole complex across the street
and surrounding buildings have mostly  window damage
but building seven comes down ....,and as Brad points out a first in history..
BTW the building Brad sited most likely did not have state of the art fireproofing and still remained standing.

Not  buying building 7....

Brad
How can we help you go further with your work??

[The Observer]

9/11 - yea...  at this point there is no use in trying to convince either side.
Cognitive Dissidence is as powerful as hypnosis.


Anyone who believes that the BBC reporting that building 7
fell 20 minutes before it did was real report
based on reality is quite hypnotized.

No need to waste a breathe on this.. the past is the past.

I am still wondering about the Gadget this thread purports to be about.
Certainly will remain positive til the fat lady sings.


Sterling... I appreciate your time and efforts.
No need waste your time convincing anyone of anything...
just continue your path reporting and posting your thoughts.

That is where your time is best spent.

Best Regards to all,
                               The Observer

[sterlinga]

5kW * 24h * 5 days would be 600kWh not 1MWh.

It's been running continuously since Saturday, April 18, not just 5 days.

Regarding my quest to sup, I've been updating that daily as I go along, and will continue to do so. I've been very transparent in its unfolding.

Also, regarding the "power outage" See my recent blog posting, which I'll copy here
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Blog:GAIA%27s_AuKW_Demo#Power_Outage_Coincided_with_AuKW_Outage.3F

I just sent this to Roberto by Skype:
[14:20 GMT] "Hi Roberto, That email I sent ~8 hours ago asks a very important question that needs to be addressed. It points out that the emergency lighting only comes on during power outages; and that that power outage to the building coincided with the outage of the AuKW, which is supposed to be independent of mains power. This needs to be addressed, as people are using it as the smoking gun evidence that there is trickery going on."
Dansie had said, for example: "Safety lighting is triggered by power failures in Germany , the USA and even here in the Philippines."
Here is Roberto's reply to my email:


  From: "Verein GAIA | Roberto Reuter"  To: "Sterling Allan"  Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 13:36 [GMT]  Subject: Re: safety lighting 

  Dear Sterling,   The so called "safety light" is the emitted light from the IR diodes of both cameras.   I attached a link to a pic from the cam - so its maybe more easy to understand..      P.S: We use a TRENDNET TV-IP310PI   with best Regards from Roberto  Just now, he explained by Skype that their website is presently "offline - as we move our webspace to a more powerful server "
I suggested "You might also take a photo of that portion of the ceiling in relation to the demo to show there is no safety light situated there."
He said he would.
/END OF BLOG EXCERPT

So, those of you who jumped to the conclusion that this was absolute evidence of fraud, how do you feel now, being shown wrong on this point? Are you going to apologize?

[MileHigh]

Not  buying building 7....

I took a quick look but I couldn't find it.  It was a PBS Nova or something like that.

Building 7 took a nasty gash in the back of the building from falling debris that literally ripped the building from top to bottom.  For hours the building was buckling and creaking and they kept people out of it for fear it would collapse.

Then when it did collapse, it did not all go down in one piece, that's a lie.  The part in the back of the building with the nasty gash collapsed first.  You can clearly see it in the video plain as day.  Then that caused the rest of the building to collapse.

In this day and age, buildings are built to be "just strong enough to stand up and make the building code."   You would have to watch the documentary for all the details.  But once the back section of the building was gone, then the other main beams started to buckle because the building was "just strong enough to stand up" with caveat that this building needed to he structurally integral also.  It was a big mother of a building, about 70 stories?

So the moral of the story is that even a big building like that can be mortally wounded and collapse after several hours if it is hit by a high-velocity 300-ton projectile that causes a zipper-like gash that runs down the back of the building.  It was a good, serious, legit documentary that I saw.

[ramset]

MH
Your getting your buildings confused...

Not that it matters here  ,,but a slashed curtainwall is by no means a fatal blow.

Not even a flesh wound...A Joke actually [to use as a reason for collapse] ...

it would be good to see what you are talking about tho...
I never really followed any of this ,to close to home ,doesn't feel good at all.

maybe you could post it in the relevant thread.
some of us are very interested in This threads topic.
as well as the Tinmans experiments.