Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

[Pirate88179]

 

If an "overunity" mechanism is to be discovered one of two things will be true:  An exception will be found to one or both of the First and Second Laws of Energy, or a new previously undiscovered fuel source will be discovered. 

This is what I have been saying for a while now.  IF a new previously undiscovered fuel source is found to be responsible for the O.U., then, it is no longer O.U.  It is then no different than a solar cell, which all will agree is not O.U.

Bill

[mscoffman]

You know the mechanism behind the Kanarev machine and the mechanism behind the Rosch OU Buoyancy device
have some things in common! This is because the mechanical load on the shaft of the air compressor is completely
decoupled from the force load on the float tanks, simulating the one way clutch.

Kanarev WebLink..

http://overunity.com/14390/motor-generators-free-energy-an-explanation/15/#.VUtFkrt0yW8

This suggests that the energy coming from generator be measured carefully to see if the buoyancy mechanism is actually
driving the generator as it supports a 7Kw load.

..S..MarkSCoffman
                 

[MarkE]

The more efficient the machine the more tightly coupled the source and the load.  In the case of the buoyancy device:  Load on the generator resists turning of the chain.  That resists movement of the buckets.  That requires more compressed air to displace more water from each bucket.  That requires more work from the compressor.  The whole thing is complete bollocks to begin with.  Gaia have given themselves ten weeks before they have to start offering excuses as to why they won't have delivered units to buyers.

[sterlinga]

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Blog:GAIA%27s_AuKW_Demo#Clarification_on_.22The_other_side_of_the_wall.22_--_could_conceal_power_cable

A photo has been brought to our attention, and now two corresponding photos, that give us a clear visual on what the other side of the wall looks like, opposing where the 5 kW AuKW demo is situation.
I've consulted with J.D. and Ronny, to get clarification and confirmation, and it seems that they were unclear in communicating to us what they saw on the other side of the wall. They confirm that this cubicle structure is on the other side of the wall, and that is where the "shop / lab / engineer area} is situated.
You'll see from my photo that I'm kind of shouting at them that I'm having problem with the depiction that I perceived from their description that the wall was blank and they inspected it for protruding wires/cables and saw none.
Now that I have a visual, I have a hard time seeing how they could rule this out for the higher of the two support beams. It's easily conceivable that a cable could be run through the ceiling level of that cubicle structure.
I'm not saying I think this is the case, I'm just questioning their report that they adequately inspected the wall to rule this out. Neither of them got up on top of that cubicle area.

[MarkE]

Ronny will not be receiving a working machine, not in 4 weeks, not in 10 weeks,  not ever.