Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

Started by ramset, April 26, 2015, 09:52:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: d3x0r on April 30, 2015, 09:15:28 PM
Irrealvent, the pressure required only exists for ... well less than a second in reality but for 1 second.  So... ya even if the temp is lost and therefore pressure goes down, the amount that is transferred from air to water in 1 second is nil.
The two salient points are:  Compression does heat the gas (air).  Given the opportunity that heat conducts out of the gas, losing energy to the surroundings.  That is the same change in energy that can later be absorbed back from the surroundings to displace additional fluid as the elastic bubble rises.  Soda water can be a refreshing treat.  It is not a source of free energy.

MarkE

Quote from: PIH123 on April 30, 2015, 09:24:30 PM
So given that we take evidence as presented, we cannot conclude if it is emergency lighting or light emitted from an infrared camera.
So a plausible explanation as TK said.


Now even without seeing an image taken from that location, I hope you will agree, we have to let that piece of the puzzle go.

Pete
As I posted a day or two ago on PESN:  Even if the building power went down, there was always an out that they could claim of the controller interrupting power from the AuKW to its loads.  Building power still looks like it failed because other lighting and the TV remained on for several seconds after the AuKW display lights and controller shut down. 

ramset

I'll look when I get the time, and you know exactly the context .
your credibility has come into question in Debates and discussions and has lead many here to realize you will
stretch the boundaries of personal integrity and  the rules of fair play [ being honest at all costs]
as well as distort and change intent on your positions if it does not fit your agenda/position.

translation ...you try to cheat...
but fool nobody but yourself.
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

PIH123

Quote from: sterlinga on April 30, 2015, 02:02:04 PM
At 17:36 GMT, Roberto wrote: "Sterling, hi, this is the Second Webcam, we can access locally only to show a video of the generator & compressor. This Cam also has IR LEDs."

That makes sense. The livestream camera was on infrared, so any light would be amplified, so a little light from this second camera, poised above the AuKW would be exaggerated. Consistent with LED as described.

Sterling, you seem to have turned a corner.

You are now questioning issues raised and appear more balanced.

I hope this bodes well for your business since that is what is needed for you to take care of your family in the manner which they deserve.

Having followed what has gone on with you for the last 5 months, I still do not agree with your "lust addiction" and actions thereof,
or the alphabetics, 9/11 and the chemtrails stuff.
But if you keep all of this out of the free energy business, you may be able to win it back yet.


Pete

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on April 30, 2015, 01:22:30 PM

QuoteI just showed you a steel reinforced freeway intersection that failed due to heat from a petrol fire.  Show me how many 1000' or higher buildings have survived a 767 full of fuel crashing into them at 500mph.

You just posted a pic of a concrete overpass that has steel reinforcing. If you do not know the difference between the two structures,then it is you who needs to go and do some reserch. Apples and oranges is what you just posted. The pic below is a better indication,and a lot closer than your orange from the apple tree. See the huge chunk missing from the building that would be more than that created by any plane. It burnt for two day's,and yet it still stand's. Once again,show me a highrise building that collapsed from fire like the WTC did.

And no-the planes wernt,cant and never did hit the buildings at the speeds claimed-->just not possable.