Friedrich Luling Magnet Motor

[Ufopolitics]

The pneumatic version does not use the same shield effect. The builder substituted the compressed air force to power the unlatching.

Look closely at Luling's schematic and you will see he rocks a ferrite keeper to the side to unlatch the attraction. This puts the shear force to work rather then the brute pull apart of the magnets by compressed air force.

The attraction is to the backing magnet behind the ferrite. This is the single most important thing to understand about this type of motor.

It would require very little pulse power to neutralize the ferrite with an electric coil. An attraction Bedini in Adam's resonance would be equally overunity.

A high perm ferrite "Orbo" style toroid would attract and neutralize the opposite magnets with the greatest minimum of power. The input power to run four finely tuned Luling motors at full speed with "Orbo" neutralization coils would not lift the needle off the resting peg of an amp meter.

Hello Synchro1,

You are right...I used a different setup than Lüling uses on his running prototype on video.

But before going into details...let me say this...please!

In order to fully understand Lüling Principle of Operation, you must FIRST understand his NEUTRALIZATION process.
If you do not...then you all would be making a lot of assumptions and theorizing over wrong conclusions, due to incorrect understanding.

Neutralization is based on balancing as close to ZERO as possible, by using two opposed forces of about same magnitude...simple
Lüling uses ATTRACTION to propulse Rotor.
I used Repulsion to propulse my rotor.
Both are based on the same principle.

Once you have a Neutralized System, based on a REPULSION versus an ATTRACTION Force, opposed and easy to spin freely its rotor...
Now, whenever you weaken, anyone of the two forces...the other one, will increase to a maximum capacity.

I weakened my ATTRACTION side, by spreading the gap with the air piston assistance...therefore, unleashing the Highest REPULSION Force at 180º...NOW, this "momentum" when I turn OFF Neutralization takes place at a certain specific point...after magnets have passed the BISECTOR ALIGNMENT, according to the desired ROTATION DIRECTION...CW or CCW.

Lüling weakens the REPULSION Side, when the massive steel arc swings forward and seats exactly at the GAP of the Repulsion side, thanks to its SQUARE HOLE, allows it to travel exactly between both magnets, one at rotor, other one at Stator.
Repulsion weakens just because magnets will no longer repulse between them, but instead, BOTH would be ATTRACTED to that Massive Steel Plate seating exactly at their gap.
Then at exactly 180º, the ATTRACTION Side will gain FULL CAPACITY...attracting rotor to align at a DEAD CENTER POINT....

But then, Neutralization would be turned ON, just before the "Sticking CENTER POINT" or TDC...and Rotor passes freely because Plate has RETRACTED and REPULSION gained its STRENGTH BACK...NEUTRALIZATION is back ON.

Finally...this neutralization process needs to take place TWICE PER RPM...exactly as Lüling explains on his video...not one word less, not one word more...

Simple stuff guys!!...

Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello to ALL,

A couple of things I would like to clarify here are...

1- I use Compressed Air Piston to ASSIST in turning OFF Neutralization, a mechanical spring, built in piston will retract it MECHANICALLY or TURN BACK ON Neutralization (just because I am not using a DOUBLE ACTION PISTON)...BUT, the Compressed Air Piston NEVER runs the Rotor guys!!

If I take off ALL MAGNETS from my setup...and just leave Air components...you could spin that rotor as much as you please....and full closing of the loop in rotation WILL NEVER, EVER take place without the Magnets on.

2- In my video, when Motor is fully running with the two actuating rods to valve...and then I pulled that Knob outwards, and hold it....I am actually CHOKING the Motor.
Just like when you put your open hand in the Air suction Throttle of your Gas Engine...just to observe how long it takes to regain its operating RPM's when you take hand off...

On video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytCVQ-OZZmM at minute 25:34 on

Conclusion: Magnets are the ONLY ones Propelling Rotor to a full speed....and out of the Four Magnets I used, ONLY TWO in the REPULSION SIDE are the ones in charge of running the Rotor.

Just wanted to make sure you all understand this points.

Thanks

Ufopolitics

[synchro1]

@Ufopolitics,

Thanks for the clear explanation. The hi perm ferrite "Orbo" neutralization coil between the stator and repulsion rotor magnet still offers more efficiency and control then Luling's clumsy mechanism.  The motor rotor has to stop and go backwards to recock after a complete revolution right?

The COP should improve driven by Mosfet.

[synchro1]

A GAP coil like the one pictured above would run the motor from the repulsion neutralization pulse with Mosfet timing and neodymium magnets.

The critical factor is wether the input to load the gate to TDC by neutralization is less than equal to the force of the gate release or not? The gate force is usually equal to the loading force. Luling's design may add advantage to one side.

The action is fascinating because as Ufopoltics explains, the rotor stops and reverses direction a few degrees to load and release the gate! Luling's design may have unbalanced the force ratio. Definitely worth taking a closer look at!

Luling's obsolete patent compares to a camshaft distributor and mechanical contact points for automotive ignition. Luling's design apparently trips the keeper with rotor tourque by camshaft and axle arm.

[kolbacict]

Nope, I did NOT claim Overunity...since I need an external source of Energy to operate it...

Well, yes. I understood this from this text.