I have a working machine

[Rall]

I have a working machine in which simple magnets are used to provide usable and measurable free energy for a normal household task.  I would like to share it and win the prize and perhaps Randi's prize, too, but it does not use or output electricity.  It just uses magnets to do useful work.  And it is perhaps the easiest free energy machine to replicate.  Could I win the prize if I convincingly show that magnets can be made to do useful work?

[Spilled Fluids]

I have a working machine in which simple magnets are used to provide usable and measurable free energy for a normal household task.  I would like to share it and win the prize and perhaps Randi's prize, too, but it does not use or output electricity.  It just uses magnets to do useful work.  And it is perhaps the easiest free energy machine to replicate.  Could I win the prize if I convincingly show that magnets can be made to do useful work?

Sorry but magnets do not produce free energy in any configuration. So that only leaves magnets doing useful household tasks like holding shopping lists to the fridge door or latching cupboards closed or keeping the shower curtain inside the tub.

[MarkE]

I have a working machine in which simple magnets are used to provide usable and measurable free energy for a normal household task.  I would like to share it and win the prize and perhaps Randi's prize, too, but it does not use or output electricity.  It just uses magnets to do useful work.  And it is perhaps the easiest free energy machine to replicate.  Could I win the prize if I convincingly show that magnets can be made to do useful work?

As long as the net energy that the magnets deliver exceeds the energy used to magnetize them and any energy input your machine requires to operate then all you need is good proof of that. 

Many have thought they had such a thing when they did not.  The odds are not favorable.  There is no need to describe any internal details of your device that you wish to keep secret.   What would be interesting is for you to describe how you tested your device and reached the conclusion that it does something that nothing has ever done before.

[Rall]

As long as the net energy that the magnets deliver exceeds the energy used to magnetize them and any energy input your machine requires to operate then all you need is good proof of that. 

Many have thought they had such a thing when they did not.  The odds are not favorable.  There is no need to describe any internal details of your device that you wish to keep secret.   What would be interesting is for you to describe how you tested your device and reached the conclusion that it does something that nothing has ever done before.

Myself and others have tested it.  The power being added by the magnets to the system is obvious and easily and unmistakably discernible.  You can feel it with your hand VERY, VERY easily and see the results.  The machine is not particularly well-suited  for rigorous measurement, and given it's geometry and size, I am not entirely sure how best to accurately measure it and quantify the degree of the effect.  It will be somewhat tricky.  But, it obviously works and obviously uses energy from magnets to perform useful work.  I just want assurance that if I share it and it is judged to be a method of getting useful work from magnets, that I can win a prize.  Because of the way that it works, and because of its miniature size, the 1 watt requirement may not be entirely applicable.  This is not a device for producing power or electricity, but it easily shows one way that permanent magnets may be used to add power to a device.  And it is replicate-able by anyone without any tools.

[verpies]

You can feel it with your hand VERY, VERY easily and see the results. 

A hand is very easy to deceive, especially when it comes to integrating small forces over long distances.  Just take a look at the SMOT.
How long can your machine move without being touched ?