'Impossible' rocket drive works and could get to Moon in four hours

[gravityblock]

My ex g/f deleted all of my research papers and I can't find the publications on the internet that may be related to this phenomenon.  If my memory serves me correctly, the publications were referenced in the papers written by Ioannis Xydous which were titled, "the secrets of the electron-positron pairs".  It should be fairly easy to find once I decide to search for it.

Gravock

Ok, I found one of the publications related to this phenomenon.  It's called the Rhythmodynamics of Nature (link posted in previous post).  This is an excellent read.

Gravock

[allcanadian]

@Bill

I actually think that I do get it.  Mark explained it much better than I could in his post above.  In my readings about the space program, I found it interesting to learn that even when weightless in deep space or in orbit, an object still has mass.  No weight, but mass.  It is one of the properties of mass that we are speaking about here.  It is not pushing off against nothing, it is pushing off against the mass of another object in your example.  That other object does not have to connect to anything in the fabric of space, it still resists movement as Newton said and therefore can be pushed off against.  My shuttle example was extreme due to the huge difference in mass but, there was still movement of both the astronaut and the shuttle.

I think you may have explained the problem better than I have.


An object having mass but no weight cannot move unless acted upon by a tangible force. This object also has the property of inertia which opposes all changes in motion which we call an acceleration.


In our example a tangible force (legs, arms or springs) pushes two objects apart accelerating them outward away from one another. At the same time a force is resisting this outward acceleration which must mean this force is acting inwards. If this force is acting inward towards the center of the two objects to resist the acceleration outward then in order to "resist" it must be acting on something else.


Yes the two objects are acting on themselves in order to accelerate outward but there is also inertia acting inwards to resist the acceleration outward. If inertia is acting inwards to resist the acceleration outwards then what is it acting on to act inward? Itself?

It is not pushing off against nothing, it is pushing off against the mass of another object in your example.

It cannot push off of another mass outward unless the other mass resists the change in motion with a force acting inward... how does this other mass resist when it is free floating in space?. There must be a tangible force present acting inward to resist the acceleration outward.




AC

[MarkE]

Yes, but more specifically it has to do with phase displacement.  For more information, see Rhythmodynamics of Nature.

Gravock

In the boat example: momentum is conserved by ejecting propellant in the form of the rocks.  When the boaters run out of rocks they lose their ability to change the boat's velocity.

[gravityblock]

In the boat example: momentum is conserved by ejecting propellant in the form of the rocks.  When the boaters run out of rocks they lose their ability to change the boat's velocity.

I wasn't referring to conservation of momentum.  The boat example is in reference to phase displacement and motion without inertia or resistance.  In other words, there is no resistance or external force acting on the boat to give it a net motion.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

It cannot push off of another mass unless the other mass resists the change in motion... how does this other mass resist when it is free floating in space?.


AC

According to RD (Rhytmodynamics), there is no motion by inertia, but there's illusion of it.  The motion by inertia is maintained by the presence of phase displacement, proceeds with constant speed and in a state of inner quiescence (synchronicity). If phase displacement is eliminated, the motion stops.

Gravock