About Perpetual Motion

Gabriele · August 22, 2015, 07:55:25 AM

I obtain an energetical surplus. Some one can consider to help me with the math? thank you

Gabriele · August 22, 2015, 12:56:33 PM

Math isn't hard.But i have a doubt. The following. If we have a capillar underwater for an example of 0.5 radius. Submerged for only an half of centimeter. I know force due from surface tension acting on external walls of capillar is the same of the max force reaceble by inside walls of capillar for the max "capillarity effect". So,if the capillar is only an half underwater,internal wall suffer by only a fraction of the max-force-capillar-effect. My doubt is the follow: if i insert a rod inside capillar for example 10cm,is obvious the skin of water will not drop for 10 centimeters. What appens? Does the skin of surface tension acts on rod like if we have the max-force-capillar-force-effect? I don't know. I'm oriented in NO.Orientation,like interpretetion is a fact of and due about things or substances like digressions can do.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Gabriele

Gabriele · August 22, 2015, 12:58:56 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBecM3CQVD8

Gabriele · August 24, 2015, 05:13:49 AM

Quote from: Gabriele on August 22, 2015, 12:56:33 PM
Math isn't hard.But i have a doubt. The following. If we have a capillar underwater for an example of 0.5 radius. Submerged for only an half of centimeter. I know force due from surface tension acting on external walls of capillar is the same of the max force reaceble by inside walls of capillar for the max "capillarity effect". So,if the capillar is only an half underwater,internal wall suffer by only a fraction of the max-force-capillar-effect. My doubt is the follow: if i insert a rod inside capillar for example 10cm,is obvious the skin of water will not drop for 10 centimeters. What appens? Does the skin of surface tension acts on rod like if we have the max-force-capillar-force-effect? I don't know. I'm oriented in NO.Orientation,like interpretetion is a fact of and due about things or substances like digressions can do.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Gabriele

None?

Gabriele · August 27, 2015, 03:10:24 PM

Think I found. This expression is related to capillarity engine,considering the liquid as a magnet. Many wise italian friends told me it "could" be possible achieve overunity from a non-conservative field like a magnetic field. If you can imagine a rawer magnetic system about water (polar) and glass,you could build a way to grow a powerful system. I thought about use of paramagnetic and diamagnetic substances but had no reply.Anyway,i discriminated a solution if the

QuoteMath isn't hard.But i have a doubt. The following. If we have a capillar underwater for an example of 0.5 radius. Submerged for only an half of centimeter. I know force due from surface tension acting on external walls of capillar is the same of the max force reaceble by inside walls of capillar for the max "capillarity effect". So,if the capillar is only an half underwater,internal wall suffer by only a fraction of the max-force-capillar-effect. My doubt is the follow: if i insert a rod inside capillar for example 10cm,is obvious the skin of water will not drop for 10 centimeters. What appens? Does the skin of surface tension acts on rod like if we have the max-force-capillar-force-effect? I don't know

will don't appens.

Waiting for the nobel i wish you all the good (and somthing more).

Gabry