New reactionless motor from India

[kEhYo77]

Superposition of BMEF fields and a split EMF flux.
I think it is just another confirmation that there is something very intriguing in exotic geometries and non standard configurations that tend to produce some asymmetric responses.

[gravityblock]

He relies on the failed N machine for support.

No, this is another false assertion and misdirection by you.  Tewari is relying on M hypothesis and not the failed N hypothesis.  MarkE and others like him suffers from indetermination of velocity and acceleration measurement used in the major physical equations which are hidden behind the term of inertial frame creating Petitio Principi fallacy.  The below picture clearly shows that the velocity of the charge must be determined with regard to the source of the magnetic field as is shown in this publication, and not with regard to an arbitrary observer, which belongs to the concept that directly causes action-reaction paradox absurdity characteristic in the concept of N hypothesis. The velocity of the magnetic field is equal to the velocity of its source, i.e. to the velocity of the magnet.  The field moves with its source!

Gravock

[guest1289]

.
(  I have no interest in this thread ,  which is why there's something I'm not totally sure about in the  posted diagram .  I only looked at the  diagram,  I did not read the posts ,  there a bit ...........  )

I assume that in  the diagram just posted  in    Post / 'Reply #47'  ,   that  the coil around the  cylinder-magnet   does actually carry  electrical-current  doesn't it ( it's not  a  permanent-magnet  in the shape of a  Coil is it  ) 

[gravityblock]

The N hypothesis led to the theory of relativity.  Einstein's first postulate is based on Faraday's description of a homopolar engine.  N hypothesis seriously violates laws of energy and angular momentum conversations. This violation is shown in the following device below (first image below, which is similar in concept with the image in my previous post) and in this video showing how the scientific community has embedded the idea of circular mental masturbation into it's theories and equations in which MarkE and his minions subscribe to.  The device below invalidates N theory and confirms the M hypothesis. 

However, the device below has limited rotation due to the physical constraints of the design, much like the physical constraints we found in the simple device as presented by the Crazy Russian Hacker.  Previous attempts in overcoming this design flaw to allow for a full rotation has failed. It appears Tewari has overcome the physical constraints inherit in the design flaws of modern DC generators.  The second image below is a snapshot of a publication by Tewari, titled "Genesis of Free Power Generation".

Gravock

[gravityblock]

.
(  I have no interest in this thread ,  which is why there's something I'm not totally sure about in the  posted diagram .  I only looked at the  diagram,  I did not read the posts ,  there a bit ...........  )

I assume that in  the diagram just posted  in    Post / 'Reply #47'  ,   that  the coil around the  cylinder-magnet   does actually carry  electrical-current  doesn't it ( it's not  a  permanent-magnet  in the shape of a  Coil is it  )

Yes, the coil does carry electrical current, and the arrows show the direction through the coil.

Gravock