World's first real Free Energy Flashlight - no shaking - no batteries! No Solar

[Nink]

That's easier than you may think. They use quantic effects, and push the electrons with their 3D-printed nano-injectors to the batteries through the LED to just a single end. Armies of tiny Maxwell daemons assure that the electrons stay inside the batteries.

OK I didn't realize they were using  Bi directional Light Emitting Diodes. Now I understand.

BTW, I just read another theory about the harvesting of Schumann resonances, and I am afraid the guy meant it seriously. He claims that the flashlight sends out Schumann frequencies that then resonate around the globe, harvesting energy on the way, and coming back to the flashlight. It is the same guy who claims he measured that the batteries are charging when inside the flashlight, while he could not detect any voltage increase when he has let the batteries out. Presenting Rasa Viharii: https://www.facebook.com/rasaviharii/posts/10156467630820788?fref=nf

The 1000+ turns you need on a tesla coil to even measure the Schumann Resonance has now been completely replaced by an aluminum case and increased from ~100mv to > 4.5v as it can charge the batteries.   I don't see a charging circuit like a capacitor and transistor anywhere in this torch so they must be collecting > 4.5v with their invisible antenna.

[skywatcher]

Curious how it recharges from the case when they are using a single pole single throw switch that when turned off disconnects the housing (sorry energy harvesting antenna) from the batteries.  We do not have a circuit when the switch is turned off and how does it charge when the batteries are no longer connected to the external case antenna ?

I was going to ask but they disabled comments on all the videos.

We simply don't know if it works, and how it works.
Arthur C. Clarke said that advanced technology will look like magic. 

You don't necessarily need an electrical connection to a structure working as an antenna.
If you have a satellite dish, the dish is not connected electrically to the receiver, but it concentrates the EM waves.
And if something looks like an accumulator, it does not have to be one.
Maybe it has some 'secret sauce' which behaves completely different.

We don't know. But we are here to find it out. 

[MileHigh]

I am willing to bet that there are genetically engineered bacteria inside the "batteries" that soak up EM waves.  The bacteria also have nano tin foil hats on their heads with nano antennae.  They also soak up the "rain" of the virtual photon flux.  There is enough "rain" in a cubic centimeter of empty space to power an LED for 10,000 years.

[txt]

You don't necessarily need an electrical connection to a structure working as an antenna.

I have yet to see an antenna without a cable. So the antenna that harvests the energy then re-emitts the energy wirelessly to the batteries, and each of them has its own antenna to receive the energy? I wonder why would anyone do that, when it would be sufficient having the main antenna connected to the battery directly (immense difference of cost, complexity, and efficiency).

I have nothing against carefully testing the flashlight and showing the hard evidence of its failure, but losing the last bit of critical thinking just to keep the hope is not necessary. If you search excuses, pull out at least something credible.

[skywatcher]

I have nothing against carefully testing the flashlight and showing the hard evidence of its failure, but losing the last bit of critical thinking just to keep the hope is not necessary. If you search excuses, pull out at least something credible.

I'm not searching excuses. But at the moment we don't have many facts, so we can only speculate... and of course we have to do some tests.
From all i know at the moment, i would also say that the chance for 'real free energy' (= 'exotic technology') in this product is < 1%.