Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Sharing ideas on how to make a more efficent motor using Flyback (MODERATED)

Started by gotoluc, November 10, 2015, 07:11:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

gotoluc

Hi everyone,

thanks for all your suggestions.

@verpies, the encoder sounds like the better way to go but then the problem is me not knowing how to program them becomes the next issue.

As for the ESC's recommendations. I am aware and have some that I tested. The problem with them is they output multiple on times operating at high  frequencies between 8kHz to 20kHz and also reverse phases (AC). How do you capture flyback with such switching conditions?

For now I'll stay with my simple plan of using the 3 optical switches. However, I do have a question for verpies about my TCRT5000 optical sensors.
Can the photo-transistor of the TCRT5000 be good enough to trigger the 4047 chip directly, or would the photo-transistor need to trigger a transistor which will then trigger the 4047?

Thanks for everyone participation.

Luc

verpies

Quote from: gotoluc on January 09, 2016, 11:10:42 AM
@verpies, the encoder sounds like the better way to go but then the problem is me not knowing how to program them becomes the next issue.
Yes, that is a problem if you are using a microcontroller (MCU) ...unless someone sends a programmed one to you.
The alternative to MCU is using several of these CMOS chips and programming them in hardware with jumpers and BCD switches ...without software.  I already know you can do it that way, but I don't know if it is any fun for you.

Quote from: gotoluc on January 09, 2016, 11:10:42 AM
I do have a question for verpies about my TCRT5000 optical sensors.  Can the photo-transistor of the TCRT5000 be good enough to trigger the 4047 chip directly?
Maybe.
The amplitude of the photo-transistor is strong enough to drive the the 4047 with a 1k pullup resistor, but the rise/fall time of its pulse might not be fast enough.  Doing it "by the book" requires a Schmitt trigger such as the 4106, that "squares up" a slowly changing signal.

gotoluc

Quote from: verpies on January 09, 2016, 01:59:38 PM
Yes, that is a problem if you are using a microcontroller (MCU) ...unless someone sends a programmed one to you.
The alternative to MCU is using several of these CMOS chips and programming them in hardware with jumpers and BCD switches ...without software.  I already know you can do it that way, but I don't know if it is any fun for you.

I don't think that's my kind of fun!... but I appreciate you bringing it up and who knows, maybe for a larger version if this test device proves to have an advantage.

Quote from: verpies on January 09, 2016, 01:59:38 PM
Maybe.
The amplitude of the photo-transistor is strong enough to drive the the 4047 with a 1k pullup resistor, but the rise/fall time of its pulse might not be fast enough.  Doing it "by the book" requires a Schmitt trigger such as the 4106, that "squares up" a slowly changing signal.

Will these work the same? http://www.ebay.com/itm/221769763079
If so, could you please draw me a schematic starting with the TCRT5000 to CD40106 to HCF4047BE with all components needed in between so I can order it all one time.

Thanks for your help

Luc

verpies

Quote from: gotoluc on January 09, 2016, 10:33:29 PM
I don't think that's my kind of fun!
You don't know what you're missing ;(

Quote from: gotoluc on January 09, 2016, 10:33:29 PM
Will these work the same? http://www.ebay.com/itm/221769763079
Yes, but I'd have to draw a different schematic diagram for the 40106, since 40106 are not the same as 4106 (the former are inverting and the latter are not).
That is of course if you choose to build a circuit that uses one of them.

Quote from: gotoluc on January 09, 2016, 10:33:29 PM
If so, could you please draw me a schematic...
Below are two ways of conditioning the signals from your optos - one is adjustable and the other is not.
Both circuits are using only one chip (4106 or AD8032).

gotoluc

Quote from: verpies on January 10, 2016, 06:01:53 PM
You don't know what you're missing ;(
Yes, but I'd have to draw a different schematic diagram for the 40106, since 40106 are not the same as 4106 (the former are inverting and the latter are not).
That is of course if you choose to build a circuit that uses one of them.
Below are two ways of conditioning the signals from your optos - one is adjustable and the other is not.
Both circuits are using only one chip.

Thanks verpies for the new circuits.

In the first (non adjustable) circuit I see you have 6 opto's... why do I need that if I'm only switching 3 phases?

The second circuit, unfortunately I don't know what threshold and hysteresis adjustments are for or what they would affect when adjusted?
Care to explain in a simple lawmen way.
EDIT I think I got it, see below post.

Thanks for all your help

Luc