47000 Watt Magnetizer

[MileHigh]

I dont have any capacitors large enough to do the job. What i do have is some very large diodes,and they will be used across the coils to form the current loop upon switch off. I will be fireing the relays by using series capacitors. This way,by adjusting the value of the capacitors,i can adjust the time the relay is on,and i will just put a high value bleed down resistor across the capacitors,so as we have an auto reset on the caps.

Sounds great.  Don't wear a watch, you might get sucked in!

I posted a comment on Aarons video about Jim Murrys generator,but he removed it within 15 minutes lol. Some just dont like the truth. Below is a screen shot i took right after i posted it.

Thought control.  It's a giant false flag.  Those guys nuked the whales in the late 1970s.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IUxK_0WLbg

[tinman]

 author=MileHigh link=topic=16209.msg466628#msg466628 date=1448366028];

Ask yourself this:  Is there any difference between a wobbling rotating magnet and a regular rotating magnet as far as it goes from the point of view of some pick-up coils surrounding the rotor?

Take a look at the diagram below MH,and see if you can understand as to the operation and the forces involved. Although the rotor magnet is spinning,the coils see only a magnetic field shifting from side to side of the core. As the odd shaped rotor magnet spins,the center of the magnet moves away from the center of the core,and one field of that magnet begins to build in that core as the other field moves away from the core. The counter force from the core pushes down on the rotating magnet,at right angles to its rotating direction. Also note the angle the magnet will be on as to that of the shaft carrying the magnet,and the downward counter force from the coil-the back torque.

Well this is the way i see it anyway,and the only way to find out is to build it. But first i have to get the magnetizer up and working-which i hope to have finished by this saterday. Then we start some test,and see if we can actually make a decent magnet with it. If not,i feel a big rail gun coming up

[MileHigh]

It sounds like you are trying to "cheat Mother Nature" and avoid any Lenz Law back-torque from the pick-up coils.  I don't see that happening.

I can see that you want to magnetize the rotor axially and it looks like the coils will see very limited changing flux like that.  I thought you were going to magnetize the rotor radially.

[tinman]

It sounds like you are trying to "cheat Mother Nature" and avoid any Lenz Law back-torque from the pick-up coils.  I don't see that happening.

I can see that you want to magnetize the rotor axially and it looks like the coils will see very limited changing flux like that.  I thought you were going to magnetize the rotor radially.

Yes,the magnet will be magentized axially(through the thickness)
Why do you think the coil will see a very limited changing flux?
At 0*,the field in the core will be neutral.
At 90*,the field in the core will carry only one pole.
At 180* the field will once again be neutral.
At 270*,the field will carry the other pole.

Anyway,like i said-only one way to find out.


Brad

[MileHigh]

Yes,the magnet will be magentized axially(through the thickness)
Why do you think the coil will see a very limited changing flux?

Brad

Well, axially magnetized means relative to your diagrams the main flux through the thickness of the rotor will be horizontal.  Likewise, the return flux above and below the rotor will be horizontal.  Obviously this is a big simplification.  That means that the horizontal flux lines will be cutting across your pickup coils at about 90 degrees - the pickup coils are on a vertical axis in your diagram.  If you have changing flux that is purely horizontal and the pickup coils are vertical then the coils will pickup nothing.  Therefore your pickup coils will pick up relatively little changing flux and thus generate relatively little EMF and have a limited available output power.