A Perspective On The B Type EESD - Robert Murray-Smith - Any issues?

[Jimboot]

Thanks for the big omission on your part acknowledging that I did not commit slander.  I suppose you would "break" if you actually acknowledged it.  I do not abuse people on this forum and I am quite certain that many people have read me over the past 12 months and they know that to be true.  I make a conscious effort to be civil.  So, I stand by what I said, period.  You keep digging yourself into a deeper hole as you continue to make that pitch, and we can't forget that you openly threatened physical violence on me.  It's time for you to stop.  The last part of your posting is just a bizarre train wreck.

The winners here are the people that are now wiser and understand that Robert Murray-Smith presented junk data.  It's up to him to correct his error if he wants to gain credibility.  That is what this thread is all about.

I have shown you several times in this thread where yo have been abusive to me and others. I won't post it again, you and I obviously have very different ideas of what is civil For instance "your FOS" most people would consider abusive language. Once again you think I care about the calculations. I do not.


Brad. - I say I would follow RMS before MH as he builds and encourages others and he is generous with his time. I have never heard him say anything bad about anyone. MH on the other hand, posts are littered insults and abuse. WHich is of course why he was banned. NOt because he was "defending" himself. He's in denial and now claims I threatened physical violence. I suggested he repeat those insults to my face but knew he would not.


Now we have a  nonsensical claim that somehow RMS YT channel will be used to encourage investors. It is not under the company umbrella, it's his personal channel. IT'S NOT AN INVESTOR PRESENTATION! There's a difference.


I think the investors will be very happy as their share price is up 150% on the year. Pretty good. That was in response to MH claiming they were a "penny stock" and that RMS was trying to deceive. Which is by MH own definition, slander. He wont be sued though as they would have to show damage.


Pete, nice to meet you. If you look back in this thread you will see I said exactly what you said. I have no problem with MH knowledge, it is the way he delivers it. I have said he behaves like a coward. Calling people names and being abusive from the cover of anonymity. Then he makes claims he has not abused anyone over the last 12 months. I was pointing out his inconsistency of claiming others make "falsehoods" but so does he. To put RMS in the same category as QEG? Really? No my mum did not christen me Jimboot lol. This is me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0GWnKGyo38 I'm the one sans hair.


Once again I will restate. I have no issue with anonymity. I do have an issue when it is used in the way I have described above. All I have ever asked is that we treat each other with mutual respect. MH obviously disagrees and believes he should be able to call people names.


I think MH should remain anonymous. I honestly think that the amount enemies he has made here would be a good reason to do so. (i'm not one of them) It'd be nice though if he could work a little bit harder at being civil. You are what you publish.

[tinman]

Not trying to ruffle feather but the two seemingly contradictory quotes have me wondering if perhaps your trifene video was another teaching aid on how easily, people like myself, can be dupped? A simple yes or no will satisfy my curiousity.

This quote from MH-(Tinman is in the same boat for the capacitors as far as I am concerned...) was an incorrect belief that my video was some sort of measurement video-which it was not. In that video(in all the triphene video's) i show only a run time on a non specified amount of energy within the capacitor. The 2600F capacity is a close guess as to what the capacity is when the cap is fully charged. This was estimated against run times,volt and amp readings over time using a known 100 farad cap. When both caps were charged to the same voltage,the triphene cap would run the same load 26 times longer than the 100 farad cap. So the quick and dirty calculation for capacity was 26 x 100--this i already stated some post back.

wondering if perhaps your trifene video was another teaching aid on how easily, people like myself, can be dupped?

No,the only time that happened was when things took off faster than i could get the last of the 3 video's up explaining what was going on.It was about how easily the akula 1 watt LED job could be made to look like it worked-and the video's did just that.But because it was about the akula device,people went balistic on it,and the next day after work when i checked my youtube and forum's,it spread like wild fire. So the first two were removed,and the 3rd was uploaded explaining how easily it could be done.
Lesson learned on my behalf,and any replication i do of fake devices like the akula rubbish from now on,will be one video showing how it was,and can be faked. It was ment to help people out,but it backfired,and i got a kick in the pants--shit happens.

The triphene cap is real,but not without it's problems that i cant seem to solve-like the low amount of charge cycles i can get before the cap just fails,and the fact that the two plates have to be squeezed hard together for best performance. So i have passed the mix on to a few people,and i believe they are still experimenting with it.

Brad

[MileHigh]

Jimboot:

I will tell you again, I am not abusive and insulting and I make a conscious effort to be civil.  And I am human and imperfect too.  You have been playing a game of "attack the messenger to draw attention away from the message" and it's enough now.  Don't threaten physical violence on me again.

That was in response to MH claiming they were a "penny stock"

Here is a definition of a "penny stock" - "a common stock valued at less than one dollar, and therefore highly speculative."  Now take a look at the attached chart for Sunvault Energy and observe how they are a penny stock and as of now they have no price to earnings ratio.

So it's time for you to stop your nonsense.  I am not the issue here, the issue is that a person that is working for a company in a technical capacity, where that company pitches better batteries, clearly showed that he is apparently incapable of measuring the energy content in one of his own batteries.  Any reasonable person can decide for themselves if he is clueless of if he is not clueless and has other motivations.  Either way, the clip is a lie and he has been informed of this fact and as of December 5, 2015 he has not retracted his false claims and taken the clip down.

MileHigh

[Jimboot]

MH You posted Simon Derricutts response earlier. He did not accuse RMS of anything or was disparaging in any way. He was polite.  Do you see the difference?

[tinman]

To the Mile High club ... Your doing it again ? Accusing someone of a crime an illegal act yet wrong or right on the numbers is not the question its how you have chosen to attack someone that can not defend himself ... He may be wrong but he may also be right ? But forget it as the man is coming forward by your demands ! So what if he is wrong but I am here to say that a battery can in fact be completely recharged if the conditions are made and set for that to happen... Now stop the digging and looking for research that can not be defended as you can never be the police man the judge the jury the executioner. STOP IT SON ! Its a waist of time !

Now I demand an end to looking for free energy and lets all get on and build it ........ My job in life is building a mega watt free energy system for as little money as possible and I do have a few good options to chose from but at the end of the day its going to the cost that determines the end designe and product.

These are my options ......

1 Negatively charged coils

2 Electron propagation

3 Magnetic vacuums

4 Gravity converters

5 Unified field oscillators

6 Radiant ambient energy

7 Covalent bond frequency convertors

8 Kinetic atomic expansion

9 Solar energy storage

10 combinations off all the above .....


Now I have isolated them all ........ hahahhaha Have you ?




























   

9 is the only device that is real. The rest is your wet dream babble.

You still need help.