A Perspective On The B Type EESD - Robert Murray-Smith - Any issues?

[MileHigh]

Er... I 'm connected with Brad on FB & Skype... we know his name is Brad... umm

Absolutely brilliant.

[Jimboot]

Absolutely brilliant.

thanks mate..

[MileHigh]

Er... I 'm connected with Brad on FB & Skype... we know his name is Brad... umm. I'm guessing the reason you are anonymous is so you can be an offensive l without repercussions. I did not attack you or threaten anyone can read the thread if they are bored out the brain and see that. You obviously don't get it. I care too much that's my problem.

You threatened me and you are simply a poseur.  Your head would implode if you dared to be honest with yourself and with the people around here.  You "can't comment" on RMS's ridiculous "mistake" my ass.  It must be stressful and fatiguing to be "on" all the time and grind away at your psyche to be "in character" all the time.  Right mate?

[minnie]

   MileHigh, both yourself and RMS. have both demonstrated an amount of
naivety on one aspect of this device-but I'm leaving that aside.
   For me the main plus point of the whole thing is that if it works to
fairly average efficiency is that the materials used are both safe and
readily available.

[MileHigh]

I only commented on the energy claims for the device which are absolutely false.  When what amounts to a "chief technical officer" for a battery company makes a clip where he can't even measure the energy capacity of one of his own batteries, it's a serious problem that merits being pointed out.  The claims are grossly exaggerated, and that can easily influence people that don't know any better, as is amply shown in the YouTube comments.  The false claims could also influence people with money to invest, which is unethical.  That merits some strong language, but the language was never abusive, which is just a false characterization by you know who.

You cannot ignore these points.  Your "main point" is a secondary point.  If the batteries can indeed be manufactured with more benign materials that is a good thing.  The problem is that this tiny company from what I can gather is far away from any manufacturing phase.  It takes a lot of money to do that, and over say the past five years there may have been hundreds of press releases about "breakthrough battery technology" that never saw the light of day.  If they actually had something that was really good, perhaps simply licensing it to a major battery manufacturer would be a viable way of bringing it to market.

All that being said, the clip is truly awful and makes totally false claims.  Does the truth not mean anything anymore?  Are we all just a bunch of sheeple?