A Perspective On The B Type EESD - Robert Murray-Smith - Any issues?

[MileHigh]

On a cookie-free browser I can't see my YouTube posting.  I assume that is a YouTube feature and RMS is hiding my posting from public view.  But presumably RMS can see my posting, the only question is whether or not he will do something about it.  Scientific integrity and intellectual honesty and all that important stuff comes to mind.

I made some postings that he can't delete or hide on one of Lasersaber's clips.

http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/sunvault-energy-adds-robert-murray-smith-phd-to-its-board-of-directors-otcqb-svlt-2025367.htm

<<< "We are extremely pleased to have Dr. Murray-Smith join our board of directors," commented Gary Monaghan, Sunvault Energy CEO. "His contributions towards the combined work on our graphene battery will lead to the development of a graphene battery that will be far beyond anyone's current expectations," he added. Over the last number of weeks Sunvault technical team members and Dr. Robert Murray-Smith have developed what they believe to be a world changing graphene supercapacitor / battery. The size of the battery that the company believes it has created has far surpassed any industry expectations of what is believed could be created with graphene today. In the weeks to come the Company will begin independent third party verifications of this exciting development.

For clarification purposes, the battery that has been produced has been produced completely outside of the previously announced Supervault joint venture agreement. Sunvault Energy for speed to market reasons and for final product capability has developed in conjunction with Dr. Robert Murray- Smith a more robust and expansive graphene super capacitor /battery. A product with the fast charging elements of a supercapacitor combined with the power density of a battery. The methods used were not any used by the former Supervault JV. >>>

I wonder how those "independent third party verifications" are coming along now that we are six months since the press release and the verifications were supposed to start in the "weeks to come."

[Jimboot]

There was a good reason for asking people if they could spot the glaring error.  This is a forum for energy research and if you can't spot an error in a clip like that, then you have to take stock and work on improving your skill set.  Pointing out facts is not slander.  Verb:  "Make false and damaging statements about (someone)."  I did not state anything that was false and people can draw their own conclusions about the clip.  Repeat: There was no slander.  So your little show is over and the facts are the facts.  With respect to another issue, stating the truth to EMjunkie drove him nuts and he wigged out and so both of us got banned.  That thread continues on and there is still nothing there.  And I was subject to abuse and I defended myself, go figure.  You are the one that needs to look in the mirror.

If RMS does not take down his clip and issue an apology and redo it properly, then people can draw their own conclusions one more time.  Right now the correct conclusion is that he has not demonstrated that his compounds for making his battery show an energy to weight ratio advantage over a lithium-ion cell.  He should take down that clip.

At 19:23 in the clip he says, "We've done that (the testing on his device) so we can make a direct comparison (with the lithium-ion battery)."  But he completely fails to make a direct comparison and the clip is a sham.

You really should retract your false claim that you have not abused people in this forum in the past 12 months. Not sure why you are trying to deceive us. I think you need to make an apology to everyone here for making such false claims.  You should also take all our rubbish out, iron our clothes and do other chores around the house for being so misleading.

[PIH123]

I think you need to make an apology to everyone here for making such false claims.

MH, Obviously, you should do nothing of the sort.

Between you and TK, you are the principal ones not afraid to tell the truth.

Notice, no one EVER refutes your claims. They just don't like the way it was delivered.
(mostly because it turns their beliefs upside down)

Pete

[Jimboot]

MH, Obviously, you should do nothing of the sort.

Between you and TK, you are the principal ones not afraid to tell the truth.

Notice, no one EVER refutes your claims. They just don't like the way it was delivered.
(mostly because it turns their beliefs upside down)

Pete

I'm referring to his claim he has never abused anyone here in the last 12 months. Nothing to do with his calculations

[PIH123]

I'm referring to his claim he has never abused anyone here in the last 12 months. Nothing to do with his calculations

So, Let's review.

His calculations were completely spot on (as I have learned many times) and admitted by you -unless I missed that.

And hence he had every right to start a thread bringing into doubt RMS's claims.



And yet, you were still the one earlier in the thread who said that you would trust RMS over MH.


And then much later on in the thread, when your guy RMS (someone giving freely of their knowledge, much like EMJ, Wayne, HopeGirl and many more),
is shown to be someone who is knowingly making false claims.
You then need to go after MH's identity and then later method of delivery of the truthful message.


Why is it that every supporter of blatantly false FE and Huge energy improvement claims, have to resort to questions of ones identity.
BTW if one wants to know why people use pseudonyms on the web, please see the thread
by Hoppfield http://overunity.com/16125/besslers-mt-125/msg464993/#msg464993 where he has contacted the Law about another member.


BTW 2, my Mum never christened me PIH123, and I am hoping your mom had better sense than to name their son Jimboot.


Pete