A Perspective On The B Type EESD - Robert Murray-Smith - Any issues?

[PIH123]

Ok little heads big mouths ask the man in question to respond to your claims

Did you miss the rest of the thread?.

How many times has MH shown where he has tried to reach out to RMS and RMS deleted that comment?

I can't see those comments any more, but I did see them briefly and can see the evidence where they were posted.


Look for negative comments on HopeGirls videos.
And for comparison, look how many comments on their be-do.com forum after the announcement of successful overunity.
It is an eye opener.

Pete

[PIH123]

and MH has never built and OU technology

And as for that comment, if he has never been able to do it, then neither will anyone on this forum ever get there.

And by TA (are you referring to Theoria-"A-Pot-To-Piss-In"Apophasis).
Yeah, well he has never shown anything worthwhile, so don't get all bent up over Kenny.

Pete

[PIH123]

...

TA the mad one is a vial monster of the mouth and MH is not someone I would trust and there for I do not believe he would of made contact or even tried to contact this man

....


I don't care of the perfection in the maths but there is a longer period of charge going on ...... And even that is pointless !

Re: 1st paragraph. I have no idea what the hell you are trying to say, so OK, I agree.

Re: 2nd paragraph, Yes TA is Mad. No probs there.
But I have witnessed MH's comments (there for a few hours in my browser) on RMS's channel.

They were suppressed.
WTF.
I thought only working devices have been suppressed over the last 140 years 



And obviously, you don't care about the math (let alone perfection), otherwise, you would not be commenting in a negative way.


And BTW, RMS comes from my home town in the UK, for which I should have some pride, and yet I feel sadly let down.

Pete

[MileHigh]

You really should retract your false claim that you have not abused people in this forum in the past 12 months. Not sure why you are trying to deceive us. I think you need to make an apology to everyone here for making such false claims.  You should also take all our rubbish out, iron our clothes and do other chores around the house for being so misleading.

Thanks for the big omission on your part acknowledging that I did not commit slander.  I suppose you would "break" if you actually acknowledged it.  I do not abuse people on this forum and I am quite certain that many people have read me over the past 12 months and they know that to be true.  I make a conscious effort to be civil.  So, I stand by what I said, period.  You keep digging yourself into a deeper hole as you continue to make that pitch, and we can't forget that you openly threatened physical violence on me.  It's time for you to stop.  The last part of your posting is just a bizarre train wreck.

The winners here are the people that are now wiser and understand that Robert Murray-Smith presented junk data.  It's up to him to correct his error if he wants to gain credibility.  That is what this thread is all about.

[MileHigh]

MH, Obviously, you should do nothing of the sort.

Between you and TK, you are the principal ones not afraid to tell the truth.

Notice, no one EVER refutes your claims. They just don't like the way it was delivered.
(mostly because it turns their beliefs upside down)

Pete

Pete,

Thank you for the support.  It happens often enough that you can get demonized around here when you are just trying to educate and convey the truth.  I am not perfect by any means, but I am honest and I am quite certain that many people can sense the veracity and the desire to do good in my statements.  Speaking up for logic and common sense is a good thing.  It's problematic to see the disciplines of science and engineering and the integrity associated with those disciplines get trashed like we saw in the example just discussed in this thread.  Especially when the person presenting the junk data appears to be "beyond reproach."  But alas, sometimes bridges collapse and when that happens you find out why and prosecute and convict those that failed in their duties, as it should be.

The measurement of the electrical energy output of a device is not "open to interpretation" and this is one of those things that is cast in stone.  If people don't play by the rules, then bad things happen like planes crash and buildings collapse.  And there is indeed a connection between tragic events like that and presenting junk data.  The crash of the Mars Climate Orbiter is another example that comes to mind.

Thanks again for your support.

MileHigh