Common batteries are free energy sources

[allcanadian]

Hey FreeEnergy
That is exactly what Im talking about! There are a few problems with it though.
1) the cost per watt storage capacity of capacitors is 100x that of lead acid batteries.
2)If your going to bother shuttling charges, the system should be perfectly conservative, that is a pulse of current should move from the source(example 24v) through a motor to the sink(example 12v). The power pulse is then the voltage difference(12v) times current flow(amps) times the duration of the pulse.
3) DC motors when switching short the Bemf wasting it,this shows up as heat and poor efficiency. AC motors have heat/resistance losses as well as conversion to AC losses, but better overall efficiency. I do not like either design- a better option is the Bedini SG a simple pulse repulsion motor. The SG let's the PM on the rotor attract to register(work out), then gives a short duration pulse to the stator electromagnet(minimal heating of coil,small duty cycle), the PM is repelled(work out), when the stator electromagnet is de-energized the forward current or Bemf is routed to the source(24v)as a high voltage spike or can be smoothed with a cap.This is drastically more efficient than conventional motors because of the operation and duty cycle.
4) If using the Bedini SG, the stator electromagnet is the input device. A separate coil should be used as an output, but this output coil should be out of phase with the input, that is the output should not happen at the same time as the input so you stagger the coils on the rotor. As well the output coil should charge the sink(12v) battery and not the two source batteries(24v).
I have learned this from trial and error, mostly error. If you want to understand why it should be done this way visit Bill Beatty's web site on what electricity is , as well as bedini's web site.
best of luck

[fesearcher]

IMPORTANT!
All the information that user Tesla_2006 was given I allready knowed. This information is available for years in certain websites. Just talk about that information in a special way like Tesla_2006 did, and everybody beleives you have succesfully built it yourself!
It is interesting to see how many people are gullible beleiving everything without seeing a proof!
Before you congratulate anybody for his/her welldone work and success, investigate the facts. Without proof all is nothing but a story!!
Although the majority of scientists don't beleive in ZPE, they however are rigth to blame a non professional working and a lack of proof for statements. This fortunately does not concern all free energy researcher!
PK

[fesearcher]

Hi Stefan,
you are telling us that the Tesla Switch is only working if we use mechanical switches because of needed sparks. This however, is not what Bedini and Bearden was talking about the Tesla switch! In a working Tesla Switch the batteries become a negative resistance because of different speed of electrons and ions. This in the end will gain more energy! It is important to pump a high current in a short time into the battery. If there is a spark or not is not of importance.
PK

[allcanadian]

@ fesearcher
It's important to understand a mechanical switch produces no heat, has no voltage drop where a transistor does. The spark is high voltage returning to source, high potential(Bemf) to low potential(source), which no transistor can handle to date.
An inductor converts incoming low voltage Emf, to magnetic field, on collapse there is a transformation, Bemf changes low voltage to near static charge.
So there is a huge difference between mechanical switches and transistors, they are not the same.

[pg46]

Good Points AllCanadian-

The tesla 4 battery system has really huge potential. You are right, let's be rid of any unneccesary heat losses and use mechanical switching systems.
I have dome some minor testing so far and the system really does look promising. At the worst case, it would at least be a very efficient use of energy with only very small losses if any.

thanks for your input