TERMODYNAMICA and DOPPLER

[tesla2]

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QFkKMQ1esDY/Vt-_G-BtrQI/AAAAAAAACnw/v3LXld1dB_w/s1600/123.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pTKzCOx-RBk/VjYaYO9dLCI/AAAAAAAACf8/P_jD_hugETg/s1600/c.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-k-fEtiw4wbs/VoAepTqBu0I/AAAAAAAACjI/aBzTu8AugkI/s1600/32.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-wtIl_UfVKRo/VoMHCa2rWHI/AAAAAAAACkc/UCGVAeYSZlQ/s1600/sun.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mfX1X9yDqDw/VLuo2Th_6_I/AAAAAAAACNU/Ir8_RIUsiu0/s1600/mar.jpg


English
https://youtu.be/k8UxtFL5Aqo

POLISH (my home langue)
https://youtu.be/uKRUXeG8MOk

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-u4uigtFfjsc/VokCgjnjkfI/AAAAAAAACmM/b8zyxLRwBvQ/s1600/eks.jpg



BIG RED experiment  (please repeat in home)

please study very slowly 3Hz example ( please take pencil and check)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-u4uigtFfjsc/VokCgjnjkfI/AAAAAAAACmM/b8zyxLRwBvQ/s1600/eks.jpg

Why test = Big RED test ?

please print below ilustration and please  mark X1 point
(Earth is making rotation respect to own axis 24h - please imagine more long arm ! ) RED or ZERO ?
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C8SSEqbpoQA/UarYNAS4ziI/AAAAAAAAA8k/L4wq9gAz1jY/s640/mmproblem.JPG


EACH COLOUR = FORCE

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pTKzCOx-RBk/VjYaYO9dLCI/AAAAAAAACf8/P_jD_hugETg/s1600/c.jpg


conclusion !
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-x3bRuG1kljw/VkQsUXVMUfI/AAAAAAAAChI/lVyGae6hAs8/s1600/TIME.jpg


In 2012 I was first person who saw red ( my small flat Poland )
i marked N-S and W-E direction on floore in my room
I took camera

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mfX1X9yDqDw/VLuo2Th_6_I/AAAAAAAACNU/Ir8_RIUsiu0/s1600/mar.jpg


I did many more work

1861 J. C. Maxwell, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.
1901  P. N. Lebedev EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF LIGHT PRESSURE
2011 Grover Swartzlander first began to examine a revolutionary concept in optical physics after studying the flight of a moth. He watched the animal use its wings to create lift, which led to flight.  Swartzlander asked : Could light be used to create the same effect?

My test :

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-k-fEtiw4wbs/VoAepTqBu0I/AAAAAAAACjI/aBzTu8AugkI/s1600/32.jpg


TERMODYNAMICA & ATOM & DOPPLER

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ZtSf6zB93Rg/VtbcMmOxsnI/AAAAAAAACnM/hopzfm7z_GI/s1600/1.png


Electrons inside left mouse are more heavy
During mouse is eating ( food = fuel ) her body is changing
energy inside food to work ( methabolism )

after You finish study problem for mouses please look
on right (down corner above ilustration )

HOW   FAST METHABOLISM has got Left and right brother ?
Are we moving respect to other object ? or we are moving respect to dynamic center ( virtual stationary point )?

Methabolism = termodynamica 
below evidence that termodynamica
is absolute and we can not escape from classic mechanic to build theories about space !


ENERGY - FLASH  MICHELSON MORLEY

( we need 1 mol hydrogen = master  EM source )
explosion = energy !

1861 J. C. Maxwell, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.

1901 P. N. Lebedev EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF LIGHT PRESSURE


FORCE x DISTANCE = WORK !

HOW MANY ENERGY EM SIGNAL WILL LOST FOR PUSHING AIR (medium)

Air in box is like a Girl  ( narow /wide arm problem it is classic mechanica)

FILM inside dark box  will not register the same ENERGY
( film is registering more dark/bright area for  signal )

Em radiation is pusshing Air inside box and making WORK
( the same brightness  is impossible for all 3D directions )
we can use bulb or special hydrogen portion (FLASH EXPLOSION )

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pf0vOT4PC_4/VGmOcWetogI/AAAAAAAACII/fHj1l3ZdWd8/s1600/3.jpg

author
Maciej Marosz
engineer and inventor
http://tesla4.blogspot.com

I want to write agreement with anyone who offer me 1000 000 USD
100% rights to BOOK and Papers publication
( Prize can be 10x more high it will be GOOD PROMOTION - you can add informations to press about money that You offer me for my words !!! It must be shock  for people who love physics
they not LOVE physics but they LOVE Einsten's marketing! 

I also explained DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT ( it is classic mechanica )

I'm only 36 yo
my work
http://tesla4.blogspot.com

physics
http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com/

[pulp]

Another flew over a cuckoo's nest

[sm0ky2]

ahh yes.
the theoretical mass of a photon...

one has to wonder why this "mass" must be included in the mathematics for everything to work out right....

why is it, that we presume the "mass" to be imaginary?
is it because of the velocity? and the energy required to obtain such?
Although, it does make a nice argument, nothing in the theory claims to know by which means said massless particle accelerated up to the speed of light to begin with.
There is no claim to the knowledge of said required acceleration force.

By what mechanism, does a massless particle undergo a downward Doppler shift, then shift upwards again back to the velocity of C ?
surely, if such object had any mass at all, the energy required would approach infinity.
So, where from comes the change in Momentum?
Under certain conditions, change in momentum can represent changes in the particles "energy".

Simply put, the point charge of a wave function, propagating at c
of any finite amplitude, greater than 0, must by default, travel faster than the speed of light.
For this to be possible, according to commonly accepted physics, the particle must have no mass.
It is not explained, how such massless particle possesses momentum.

It is also not explained how the point-charge of a propagating wave, can successfully violate relativity.

There are those that will argue with what I just stated, and to you, I challenge thus:
Measure the distance covered by the wavefront, of any wave propagating at "c".
of ANY amplitude, the point-charge of the wavefront must cover a distance
greater than the linear point to point distance of the wave propagation.

If the wave is propagating at a velocity of "c", then the distance it covers (linearly) corresponds to
the distance covered by "c" during the time allotted.

The point-charge at the wavefront, must also travel in the vector of the amplitude.
Thus, the total distance traveled is greater than that of "c", during the allotted time.

This problem is generally skipped over in the education systems.
we simply state boldly that the particle "has no mass", and therefore, the equations do not apply.
However, when we need to apply them, we have to take the calculated (or theoretical) mass value
for the math to work out right.,

This "theoretical mass" is exactly the mass value calculated by it's momentum

So, using Momentum as the units in our equation, explain the Doppler effect.
hmm....
There's something wrong here,. is there not?
Is the Doppler shift, in fact, not thermodynamically equivalent?
Is Thermodynamic Theory incomplete? or excepted, in this case?