Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



MetaQEG- An invitation to TinselKoala to a cooperative build.

Started by Meta, April 03, 2016, 12:09:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

conradelektro

Quote from: Meta on April 06, 2016, 03:15:18 AM

Which of you losers wants to build it and prove Bearden and myself wrong...its your perfect opportunity....Do you realize its not Beardens circuit any more? Its Bearden with a twist.......or do you fall under my warning as quoted in my original offer.....


It has been said very often in this forum that negative proof is not possible (or better said: a negative proof is a logical fallacy), but I want to repeat it for Meta and all people who still do not understand what can be proved and what can not be proved.

Look at this web site, it explains very clearly why Meta is wrong by demanding "Bearden or himself should be proved wrong":

http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialsciences/ppecorino/phil_of_religion_text/CHAPTER_5_ARGUMENTS_EXPERIENCE/Burden-of-Proof.htm

https://youtu.be/KayBys8gaJY (if you prefer to watch a video explaining the burden of proof)


For all who can not read and understand the above web site, I explain it in very simple words:

- One can not prove that Bearden's MEG does not work. Whatever one builds and if it does not work, someone can claim that an essential feature has been overlooked or that it was implemented in a wrong way.

- But one could prove that Bearden's MEG works indeed by demonstrating a working MEG. Of course the demonstration must be clear and measurements must be verifiable by third parties.

Said in even simpler terms: The burden of proof is with Bearden or Meta.

Greetings, Conrad

verpies

Quote from: conradelektro on April 07, 2016, 09:07:17 AM
It has been said very often in this forum that negative proof is not possible (or better said: a negative proof is a logical fallacy),
More precisely an existential negative proof is a logical fallacy.
This happens because:  the lack of proof of existence, is not a proof of non-existence.

verpies

Quote from: tinman on April 07, 2016, 06:54:31 AM
Then maybe--just maybe,some one will have the time to waste...
It is not only about time.

To make a SPST bilateral switch that switches-OFF high voltage below 10ns costs ~10kUSD.
...and switching-OFF below 1ns costs at least ~100kUSD.

But the MetaQEG requires two SPDT bilateral switches, with unknown delays between the throws (MBF?).  You can only guess how much that would cost!


P.S.
Switching ON high voltage with speeds around 1ns is cheap because an ordinary spark-gap can do that.  Krytrons and Sprytrons are better of course, albeit not cheap ;)


Meta

Quote from: AlienGrey on April 07, 2016, 03:21:38 AM
Calm down Meta   your sounding just like that Atom guy, Go back and read your reply to each comment you have I'm sure it says much about you!

life is for learning and control is Satanic demonic even.

Since when did my thread become an examination of the messenger rather than the job I give to you to examine the message, which you consistantly fail to do.

You assholes consistantly turn every thread into the erroneous premise that

If the messenger is a saint, the messengers device will work.
If the messenger has errors, at all, the device is unworthy.

Listen up assholes, my devise doesnt care who I am and I will be anyone I want to be, toward you.