Marko Rodin Coil -- 007 Device

[tinman]

I have not looked at .99's zip file but if it says the above, just ignore that for now and go with the "contains an infinite number of odd harmonics" definition.  This assumes, of course, that you are dealing with a perfect square wave as I previously discussed.

Just think of all the crazy 1kHz waveforms you can create using your FG by selecting sine, triangle, or square wave and messing about with the duty cycle and rise/fall times.  All those different waveshapes and yet your scope and FG continue to just readout 1kHz.  The difference between each waveshape is the additional, higher than the 1kHz fundamental, harmonics/frequencies contained in each waveform.

I believe your FG has two channel outputs.  You could combine a 1kHz sine wave (fundamental) from one channel with a 3kHz sine wave (3rd harmonic) from the other channel and begin to see a square wave develop.  If you could continue to add additional odd harmonics (or at least imagine doing so), each additional harmonic would fill in a bit more of the observed ripple.  5 harmonics makes a pretty good looking square wave, but as they say, the more the merrier...   

I do not believe that as an experimenter, this concept is going to "click" with you until you see evidence of it for yourself.  Consider performing the simple tests I have described using an audio graphic equalizer.  I think it will help solidify the concept.

You should also become familiar with the FFT function on your scope.  Feeding various waveforms from your FG into your scope's FFT function will reveal the additional frequency content of any particular waveshape. 

It would be time well spent...

PW

As i managed to screw up the current/voltage waveforms being ass about on the scope,i think i should first learn the basics of reading a scope in normal operation 
I have had a quick look at the FFT function,and i can indeed display this at the same time,using the split screen display. I also see what you mean about the harmonics in a square wave generated by my FG.

But please remember,that this is not my forte,and it will take me some time to get my head around all this,and what it means to the outcome of power measurements-if anything at all?.


Brad

[MileHigh]

Russ is back and the project starts to move forward.

So Jbignes5 has given you guys on Russ' forum the whole spiel on plasma and the coil as he sees it.  I think that it would be wise to split the thread into two threads, practical and theoretical side.

On the theoretical side, you have read what Jbignes5 has had to say.  From earlier on, I stated that the Rodin coil is just an inefficient way of making an inductor with wire because of the excessive amount of magnetic field self-cancellation that is taking place.  Beyond that, the Rodin coil is just like any other inductor, no more, no less.

On the practical side, Russ needs to make a reference control coil of approximately the same inductance as the Rodin coil.  The pdf that I looked at had no schematic, no test procedure, and showed voltage and current "output" waveforms that were nearly 90 degrees out of phase indicating there was next to no real output power.  Shockingly, the person that wrote that report was apparently unaware of this, so that means the person is not credible, and the report is not credible.

It looks like Russ and all of you guys need to develop a proper schematic and test procedure by yourselves, then test the Rodin coil and the control coil step by step and see what you get.  Never keep your eye off the ball - electrical power out vs. electrical power in is what the whole thing is about.

On the practical side, you can expect that you will not see anything related to plasma at all, and Jbignes5 will have to explain that one.  There is nothing special about plasma, anybody can look it up and read all about it.

MileHigh

[glennmr]

 hei-hallo All & Sundry!

Marko Rodin is a great guy and have shown us that your number matrix is a key to higher dimensionality, however, may i humbly tell you that i have worked out that it is not quite complete, and that all we need to add is ANOTHER SET OF 2 MORE ANGLES (making eight) so that it then becomes a truly 3-D representation of a key that can then lead us up/out into the 4-D and beyond!! - i do not say this lightly or flippantly, and can prove what i am claiming!
[/size][/size][/font][/color]

Another way of saying this is that your 6-angle matrix is suffering from 2-D-edness and as such can only try to give us HINTs as to what is beyond, and in actual Fact – what is AROUND THE CORNER(s) of this 2-D depiction! - (the Best illustration in the world for this step-up to the 3-D and beyond is the humble TENNIS BALL – Examine the continuous lining on the tennis ball and you will begin to see EXACTLY what i am getting at! - Look at it from all available angles (360) and you will soon realize that it presents a set of EIGHT x 90 degree angles rounded off to make it all look nice and smooth (which it is) but then mentally adapt all those 8 curves into sharper right-angles and BINGO – you will realise like an epithany that this common object truly represents something 'out of this world' and is really worth meditating on, or at least studying deeply! - This occured to me over 15 years ago, but i couldn't put it all together concisely until recently, bit now i can confidently say that this kind of 3-D model is far superior and as such can and will let us be lead into an understanding of the 4-D and beyond, and moreover, can then even let us get insights into the 4-D nature of the earth-globe itself !! !! .... ... .. . (yes, think 720)(if anyone doubts what i am claiming, just recall the Doubly-imbedded Tetrahedrons in the globe presented by many other researchers out there already!, and that's saying something, man!!) What this insight could do for advances in Mathematics as well as Physics et al, goes beyond our wildest dreams of imagination (exclaimation marks) of which the Rodin Coil is only the start.

Again, please accept my humblest contribution in shedding new light on this topic.

GMR

[carbon sugar]

tienes razon, la bobina rodin es espectacular, mejor aun la bobina poe vortex de daniel nunez y mejor aun la bobina unificada, la rodin con la poe juntas, no se si nadie se da cuenta o no quieren dar cuenta por culpa de su ego, esas bobinas son la clave de la energia libre y de la sobre unidad, con esas bobinas pude hacer bolas de plasma saliendo de mi jardin, las que hacia nikola tesla en su laboratorio, esas bolas de plasma, para poder lograr eso, tiene que haber alta frecuencia, estas bobinas logran eso

[Jeg]

Is anyone still on this?
Any conclusion?
The extra voltage is pure reactive. If a resistive load is connected at the output the extra voltage is gone.
In both cases he measures as the output current, the total tank circuit's current and not the current that flows through the load. In addition to that, the leds that he used are in series and their break down voltage is near to the peak value of the cap. So at least at the second case of loads (leds) the output power is far less than what is presented.