Graham Gunderson's Energy conference presentation Most impressive and mysterious

[EMJunkie]

Thanks Chet, Reiyuki!

Thats exactly right, Facts remain facts. Will never change!

Please read the entire article, here is a snippett:

Here's a circuit that can be placed in series with a resistive load to make it "nonlinear", and suitable as a load for a MEG.

...


This is allegedly necessary for COP>1 operation in a MEG.

...


In the MEG device, the flux from the permanent magnet alternates between the two leg paths, representing more oscillating energy than the drive coils are providing.

How much work did Graham Gunderson really do with the MEG before 2012? Obviously a LOT!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


P.S: Its worth noting, this is NOT what Graham is currently using, it is more like a variant of these ideas.

[EMJunkie]

Yes, I cant help myself. Sorry.

I want to point out the fact that I also posted the Input circuit, LC Resonant at the same time I posted the output Circuit. I have used both Series and Parallel Resonant and even a combination of both... Also posted approximately 2 years ago.

The only difference, is Graham has a Relax Period where he switches off his input.

Chet, what did I say to you?

That you will see the exact same principles I have brought to this forum for ever after? Somehing like this?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

P.S:  This just might be one of the biggest "I Told You Só" ever? Just how is it that Graham is showing, nearly the exact same thing, same principles, I have shown for years?

[EMJunkie]

I think it is really important that everyone does not forget that these Systems have worked and do work today with none of the complicated Switching that Graham has shown!!!

AC Systems do work, as has been stated by so many in the past!!!

We are very lucky to have Graham share his device, along with his VERY Expensive measurement equipment and his expertese on how to use this equipment!!!

Thank you Graham.

Thank You Reiyuki for your awesome documetation efforts and sharing your imformation!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[FatBird]

I wouldn't touch that with a 10 FOOT POLE.  It looks too much like
Daniel Poperlou's circuit.  Yeah, Daniel's circuit lights a light bulb, BUT
do you really think you can Duplicate his Rat Nest?  LOL

http://overunity.com/393/daniel-pomerlou-demonstrates-free-energy/#.V4gQqtQrKHs

                                                                                                                       .

[EMJunkie]

I wouldn't touch that with a 10 FOOT POLE.  It looks too much like
Daniel Poperlou's circuit.  Yeah, Daniel's circuit lights a light bulb, BUT
do you really think you can Duplicate his Rat Nest?  LOL

http://overunity.com/393/daniel-pomerlou-demonstrates-free-energy/#.V4gQqtQrKHs

                                                                                                                       .

I just cant help think Daniel was trying to tell us somehing so very much more important than how a device looked...

He did say that Women could do this better than men, because they could feel it, use intuition better than Men...

Diakoptics:

In systems analysis, Diakoptics (Greek dia–through + kopto–cut,tear) or the "Method of Tearing" involves breaking a (usually physical) problem down into subproblems which can be solved independently before being joined back together to obtain an exact solution to the whole problem. The term was introduced by Gabriel Kron in a series "Diakoptics — The Piecewise Solution of Large-Scale Systems" published in London, England by The Electrical Journal between June 7, 1957 and February 1959. The twenty-one installments were collected and published as a book of the same title in 1963. The term diakoptics was coined by Philip Stanley of the Union College Department of Philosophy

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org