FE in the news / new FE offer

[tinman]

Thanks for that offer Brad.

I would dearly love to see where you are at performance wise.

Understand that this device utilise a third brush and I have already tested this out on a non permanent
magnet universal motor (like the vac motor in the RTv3 videos) and sure enough - you can pull a greater voltage out from the third brush.

Have a spare treadmill motor that I will cut away some of the casing near the rotor to expose the commutator and test as shown.

If you like I can begin a new thread titled Tinman's RT - 09/16 progress.

Once again, thanks for the offer.

Sorry to hear about the betrayal you encountered and fully understand the need to keep things close to you chest.

Regards, Penno

No-no new thread,as i dont have much to offer a dedicated thread.


Brad

[gyulasun]

....
I'll leave it up to the people in this thread to decide,and let me know by way of comments in this thread,as to whether i post here or not.
....

Hi Brad,

I would also be interested in your rt device regarding where you are at with it nowadays. I understand your stance of not presenting the internal workings of the device.

I have written to lancaIV who started this thread and he just answered positively to use this thread. 

Thanks, Gyula

[lancaIV]

Maybe not ultra-polite, but still very much correct. If the basics are wrong, what follows will also be wrong.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140515123331.htm
"We were able to convert a high-output performance of ~250 V from the slight mechanical deformation of a single thin plastic substrate. Such output power is just enough to turn on 100 LED lights," Keon Jae Lee explained.


The self-powered nanogenerators can also work with finger and foot motions. For example, under the irregular and slight bending motions of a human finger, the measured current signals had a high electric power of ~8.7 μA.

But the important part of this article is the notice about an achieved world-record in efficiency !

[memoryman]

"But the important part of this article is the notice about an achieved world-record in efficiency !"
nonsense; no actual efficiency figures are quoted before or after.

[lancaIV]

"But the important part of this article is the notice about an achieved world-record in efficiency !"
nonsense; no actual efficiency figures are quoted before or after.

In addition, the piezoelectric nanogenerator has world-record power conversion efficiency,almost 40 times higher than previously reported similar research results, solving the drawbacks related to the fabrication complexity and low energy efficiency.


Pardon,memoryman,english is not my mother-language,but I think to understand what is written !
This is an article,a short information about a work performance which has several months -up to years professional re-/search behind !


KAIST is the name from this scientific org,who is interested to get more detailed information has
not to discuss this in third hands kind -there is the right place to become involved !