Have overunity . . . need help

[Tim Beane]

You don't HAVE OU unless you have a working prototype. So, saying it IS misleading.

Once again, I am not misleading anyone.  I have stated my needs and am not here to prove or debate anything. 

[Tim Beane]

Hi, you need a working prototype before you can get a patent.

Yes, I am fully aware that a prototype must be supplied.  What is not written as a guideline for obtaining a patent on over unity is in addition to the working prototype, its operation must also be thoroughly described as it applies to the laws of thermodynamics . . . which is why I am here. 

[memoryman]

Given a full disclosure of what you are claiming, many people on this site can 'debunk' your idea. That would signing a NDA, which may conflict with the signer's interests. Of course, you may not want to believe the debunker, as that would mean giving up your dream.

[Low-Q]

Hi Vidar,
I'm not pursuing help with my design but thank you for your offer.

You needed help. If none can see your design, you can not expect to get any help.
A patent will also require a working prototype - which you don't have.
What kind of help do you need?
If you ask for help, and don't want our help, this thread is a waste of time ;-)

Right now I need to find an individual to discuss the physics of this design with

We can discuss. No problem.


Vidar

[Tim Beane]

If you do not claim it as a perpetual device but as an enhancement to efficiency,, then things are not so hard.

It might take a court battle just to get it considered if you claim it as perpetual.

Another trick is to claim it as a toy,, just sayin' 

Yes, that approach has been discussed with my patent counsel.  We have opted to hit it head on.  Although it is not being titled as a perpetual device, its theory of operation identifies it as requiring no input to start, or sustain its operation.