Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Capacitor to capacitor discharge. The truth about the energy loss.

Started by pomodoro, January 10, 2017, 07:28:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pomodoro

There have been a few threads on tackling the problem of where the energy loss really goes when a charged capacitor is used to charge another uncharged capacitor. The energy is not conserved no matter how its done.  Usually the thread ends up in another direction. This is a very important question as OU research often uses capacitors.Have a look at the link below, but do not believe the explanation given instead search for the word 'tweet' and read the comment about charge redistribution. That I believe is the correct answer, not the one mentioning radiation or resistive losses.
http://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/living-analog/4394290/Capacitor-charge-transfer-

pomodoro

The exact same 'loss' occours when the cap is allowed to double in capacity by allowing the plates to come closer.In both cases C*V is always conserved. Then we can decrease the capacity back to the original and we gain back the loss. Obviously work is involved in this step and it will equal to the 'loss' of energy found in the calcs in the first step, but was the loss converted into heat or in some internal potential energy, like in a spring.


pomodoro


Tito L. Oracion

Quote from: pomodoro on January 10, 2017, 07:28:42 PM
There have been a few threads on tackling the problem of where the energy loss really goes when a charged capacitor is used to charge another uncharged capacitor. The energy is not conserved no matter how its done.  Usually the thread ends up in another direction. This is a very important question as OU research often uses capacitors.Have a look at the link below, but do not believe the explanation given instead search for the word 'tweet' and read the comment about charge redistribution. That I believe is the correct answer, not the one mentioning radiation or resistive losses.
http://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/living-analog/4394290/Capacitor-charge-transfer-


for me there is no loss, it just like pressure diminishing.because it is seeking for balance. :)