GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)

[that_prophet]

This uses the 100 cm of moving belt that comes off of one single rotation of a large 100 cm circumference pulley, that only costs a mere spark of current, the minute amount of current that a DC motor takes to rotate one full rotation. This moving belt is run past 10 small pulleys of 1 cm circumference, to multiply your total # of rotations. Then by simply adding AC generators to these small pulleys, we can multiply the amount of AC electricity. Yes, by adding multiple small 1 cm circumference pulleys to the same belt as the large 100 cm circumference pulley, we can multiply the # of rotations, and by adding AC generators, we can multiply the amount of AC electricity.

On one half of this system we are using the 100 cm of moving belt, off the single rotation of a 100 cm circumference pulley to wind up massive voltage, by multiplying the # of rotations of free running AC generators on 10 small-1 cm circumference pulleys, 10X100=1000. Then, on the other side of this, we are using the high amount of voltage to rotate the large 100 cm pulley one single time.

These many small pulleys run free of most any torque, because they are only winding up massive voltage, as they only need to generate the small bit of DC current, that is needed to rotate the DC motor one single time. This DC motor has a large 100 cm circumference pulley, producing 100 cm of moving belt to work with. I can say this because torque is needed to generate power, and P=IV, which is, power is equal to "I"-current times "V"oltage. Since the current is practically zero, and practically zero times even massive voltage is still equal to practically zero power=torque. http://free-energy.yolasite.com/

[Paul-R]

Joe
working on getting you that Sim so you can model these things
trying to get one with some support so you can get help working with it.

The software needs to be "Ezekiel enabled" or it won't produce the daft results that that_prphet requires to be confirmed.

[that_prophet]

it only has to produce 100 cm of moving belt, off the one rotation of a 100 cm circumference pulley, and then produce 100 rotations for every small1 cm circumference pulley that you attach. Then by adding AC generators to these small pulleys,,, it produces 100 cycles of AC electricity. That is trading one rotation for 100 rotations, + with AC electricity this can be very beneficial

The software needs to be "Ezekiel enabled" or it won't produce the daft results that that_prphet requires to be confirmed.

[that_prophet]

This works on the simple principle of through pulley mechanics, being able to trade one revolution of a 100 cm circumference pulley for 100 rotations of a one centimeter circumference pulley. This can be very significant, when you are talking about AC electricity, which is created by rotations. So, the more rotations can mean more AC electricity. So, in effect, you are using pulleys to multiply your AC electricity.

[SkyWatcher123]

Hi all, Hi that_prophet, i just had a thought about an easier design, that may operate with the same pulley mechanics prophet is looking for.
Though this does not use individual pulleys.
How about one very large rotor wheel, like 3 feet in diameter or greater, with magnets around perimeter or close to edge.
This big magnet wheel could be separate mounted with dedicated bearings, then shaft coupler or chain or belt drive.
Then, one coil mounted at periphery, would act as the small pulley at alternator.
Then as many coils as one likes can be placed around wheel, next to the magnets.
This seems like the same principle.
One turn of the drive motor, will yield possibly 50 or more coil/magnet interactions, per coil, depending on how many magnets are on the wheel.
Add another coil and we have 100 coil/magnet interactions per drive motor turn.
Now couple this setup, with Thane Heins delayed lentz reaction coil design and things could get interesting.
Does this sound equivalent to your design principals that_prophet?
peace love light