Magnet force shield

[dieter]

[/font]Hey, maybe you've found a new use for my videos!Doctors could use them to treat sleep deprivation Luc

[/font]
They're totally useful and prescription free ^^ But seriously I like your videos a lot. So, this wasn't meant disrespectful.

[gotoluc]

Sinc you are committed to doing good science, I dare to present some good science about magnetic shielding:

http://www.magnetic-shield.com/pdf/how_do_magnetic_shields_work.pdf

I cite from this document: "Magnetic shielding materials re-direct a magnetic field so it lessens the field's influence on the item being shielded. Shielding does not eliminate or destroy magnetic fields, nothing does."

http://www.magnetic-shield.com/pdf/will_magnetic_shield_block_the_fields_effects.pdf

I cite from the document: "There is no known material that blocks magnetic fields without itself being attracted to the magnetic force. Magnetic fields can only be redirected, not created or removed."

There you find many good articles:

http://www.magnetic-shield.com/faqs-all-about-shielding.html

I hope you are not offended by some real science. You may call me troll, but you should read good science. It might help you to avoid years of useless work. Sorry for my trolling. I may look like an attack, but my intention is charitable.

I always hope for good arguments against well known science. But since I read the OU Forums I only have seen childish misconceptions. And the reason for this stupidity is because the "inventors" have not read the most simple science books or articles. One has to know what is allready known before going beyond.

Greetings, Conrad

Let me just remind everyone that for more then 100 years those who have learned "good science" have not come up with anything new to replace fossil fuel.

It's also a shame that the established "good science" can't even explain electricity, gravity or magnetism after studying it for more then a century.

It continues to fascinate me how those who claim "good science" can keep their head up so high even if they fail to explain the above three effects.

I just don't get it!... could it be they want us to be like them so we can also fail?

Regards

Luc

[gotoluc]

They're totally useful and prescription free ^^ But seriously I like your videos a lot. So, this wasn't meant disrespectful.

Yes, I know and why I added a smiley face


Regards


Luc

[conradelektro]

Let me just remind everyone that for more then 100 years those who have learned "good science" have not come up with anything new to replace fossil fuel.

It's also a shame that the established "good science" can't even explain electricity, gravity or magnetism after studying it for more then a century.

It continues to fascinate me how those who claim "good science" can keep their head up so high even if they fail to explain the above three effects.

I just don't get it!... could it be they want us to be like them so we can also fail?

Yes, you are right "good science" does not know most of the world, but that is not a secret and every "good scientist" knows the very narrow limits.

But have you ever seen a good answer to your big questions in any of the OU forums or in any of the OU books and articles?

I have nothing against looking for new answers, but please do not announce OU or anything new before you really have it. The so called "inventors" in the OU forums always claim something without delivering anything useful. The only things I ever saw were unsubstantiated claims and most of them were pretty stupid, fodder for wishful thinkers.

So for once please deliver or be humble enough to admit that you have no answer either. I really do not like claims which are not supported by facts. Words cause warm air or take up space in a useless post but never generate energy.

You may wish, dream, hope or believe whatever you like. But all this is useless without facts. Please do not mix dreams and facts. The result is nonsense.

Greetings, Conrad

[dieter]

I have to say, trough the various failures of me and others I have learnt much more than from the textbooks. I agree, none should sell (figuratively or literalry) a theory as a working prototype.


It is true that there is real junk science in this field. The whishful thinking followers are naive and have to learn their lesson.


But the fact that the deceivers lie does not automaticly mean everything else is true, such as the statement "there is no free lunch". The whole universe is one free lunch, waiting for being harvested.