Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Self running magnet piston generator.

Started by synchro1, March 07, 2017, 05:36:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

synchro1

 "Overunity Design" pictured below: 4 self cocking units, triggering each other in succession. Once set in motion, this design would continue to run forever! Plenty of electrical output could be drawn just by building pickup coils around the powerful oscillating piston magents. This generator should deliver 3 times the force it takes to run itself, so it could easily produce kilowatts of power.

We can clearly see the "Trigger Sheer" magnet forcfully resetting itself at 5:11 in Ima MagnetFanatic's video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvLjgZWl4s8

This "Self Retraction" event adds a super plus advantage to the generator! "Ima MagnetFanatic" says the magnet tube glue dosen't hold up; A threaded brass rod and four aircraft locking nuts would solve that problem

synchro1

Here's a bamboo version of the magnet piston with weak Radio Shack ceramic ring magnets:

https://youtu.be/awL8uIrj5NY

Here's another video of the piston in action.The throw is directly proportional to the repulsion force between the stationary axle magnet and the top piston magnet: The stronger the magnets the larger the throw:

https://youtu.be/awL8uIrj5NY

"A 1" cube magnet with a 94.6 lb pull force has a Shear Force of about 28.5 lbs". The ratio is 3.3."

The  trigger magnet sheer force to piston push pull force is exactly the same as the sheer to push pull force ratio of the 1" cube.


Zephir

This patent would probably deserve it's own thread, but it's related to this one at least in principle.

Device and control system for producing electrical power

Inventor: Michael Cristoforo Douglas Willard Lindstrom
Current Assignee: Magnetic Miles LLC

Abstract

Briefly, the invention involves a system and method for generating electrical power. The system includes an electromagnet positioned with one pole directed toward a like pole of a permanent magnet. The permanent magnet is preferably mounted for oscillating movement toward the pole of the electromagnet. A control system for the electromagnet is provided to supply direct current (DC) power in the form of square wave pulses which coincide with the position of the permanent magnet. Power is collected upon the collapse of the magnetic field within the electromagnetic magnet. In some embodiments the present device is supplied in the form of a reciprocating engine which provides rotary motion in addition to the electrical power generated.

This principle is here for quite some time already -, so that the patent presented would probably violate priority of many others. The basic idea is, the magnet attracts ferromagnetic objects only until they're not saturated with electromagnetic field (magnetic field of electromagnet). The usable work is done, once the saturation gets shut down again without involvement the backward electromotive force to electromagnet. The magnon or even LENR stuff is speculative here, because the overunity could be explained even without them.

penno64


synchro1

Quote from: Zephir on March 07, 2017, 06:30:00 AM
This patent would probably deserve it's own thread, but it's related to this one at least in principle.

Device and control system for producing electrical power

Inventor: Michael Cristoforo Douglas Willard Lindstrom
Current Assignee: Magnetic Miles LLC

Abstract

Briefly, the invention involves a system and method for generating electrical power. The system includes an electromagnet positioned with one pole directed toward a like pole of a permanent magnet. The permanent magnet is preferably mounted for oscillating movement toward the pole of the electromagnet. A control system for the electromagnet is provided to supply direct current (DC) power in the form of square wave pulses which coincide with the position of the permanent magnet. Power is collected upon the collapse of the magnetic field within the electromagnetic magnet. In some embodiments the present device is supplied in the form of a reciprocating engine which provides rotary motion in addition to the electrical power generated.

This principle is here for quite some time already -, so that the patent presented would probably violate priority of many others. The basic idea is, the magnet attracts ferromagnetic objects only until they're not saturated with electromagnetic field (magnetic field of electromagnet). The usable work is done, once the saturation gets shut down again without involvement the backward electromotive force to electromagnet. The magnon or even LENR stuff is speculative here, because the overunity could be explained even without them.

@Zephir,

Thanks for the Hyper-links. I agree with you that there's not much new in the patent. I ordered a few dozen neo tube magnets from K&J magnetics and half a dozen acrylic tubes for my next test.

The piston force is really around three times the trigger force; So, a second trigger magnet attached to struts connected to the first piston tube should deliver sufficient force to power the second piston tube one full stroke. One simple chain reaction like that, just one, would act as irrefutable proof of Overunity.