Mervace Working Magnetic motor using induction feedback

[Merv]

I did not know of Mr. Adams work. Now we are doing science. Is he still around or have they taken away. At the time I made my motor there was no huge exchange of ideas like nowadays, My idea was 90% thought with very little practical work    The design was mostly from ideas learned while at secondray school.  My motor, like most things in life requires perfect timing to run efficiently. At the time of my work I felt there were some unusual effects. I concentrated on getting a very efficient motor movement. You do not get much energy from a fully charged cap at the best of times. Oh .  My comments do not always appear on UTUBE either. This is the first time I have seen your fourm. Also I only found UTUBE about a month ago. Things happen  slower  in the land down under. Do you have any contributors from Australia?

[Omnibus]

@Merv,

Can you post the schematic and give us more detail regarding the construction so that other people can replicate it successfully?

I take it that you are shorting the cap at the beginning. Have you tried it with a Faraday cage so that effects of a "100 kilowatt transmitter" be excluded?

As for Finsrud, I have personally visited him and his machine is for real (art is a separate issue). Yours (if indeed it shows a real effect) and his may not be too different in concept. As in yours, I guess, Finsrud's as well as Torbay's require excruciating pains to find the optimum conditions for continuous disbalance, as it were. This isn't easy. It has taken Finsrud decades and many, many unsuccessful constructions (some of which he showed me personally) to reach the point he is now.

[Omnibus]

@Merv,

Forgot to mention this. Production of excess energy has already been definitively proven in SMOT, even if SMOT is not in a closed-loop, which is in violation of the principle of conservation of energy. Therefore, I don't think we should worry now as to whether there are unusual effects at play. There are. The problem is now purely technical, that is, how to harness these effects in practical devices. Yours is probably a promising one but independent researchers have to replicate it and it has to be published in peer-reviewed journals.

[peter_schmalenbach]

I did not know of Mr. Adams work. Is he still around or have they taken away.

Hello Merv,

nice to have you here now.



Best regards
Peter Schmalenbach

[Adzoe]

@Merv,

Production of excess energy has already been definitively proven in SMOT, even if SMOT is not in a closed-loop, which is in violation of the principle of conservation of energy.

PLEASE!  Show me a single example of overunity in any SMOT device open to full scientific scrutiny and replication by investigators.  Do not cite Greg Watson, as his 3-foot MK-3 has never produced more than 5 cycles at a minute each.  These devices always slow down and stop.  This is the natural result of friction and magnetic resistance in the system.  I eagerly await a full description of a working perpetuum SMOT device that has been duplicated by researchers with results published in reputable peer reviewed scientific media.

Here's a simple test.  Calculate the pull when a ball is placed at the beginning of a SMOT.  Energy is consumed placing it there.  Let the ball exit the SMOT into a track and run until it stops.  Now replace the SMOT with a ramp or other device that carries equal potential energy.  See which one rolls farther.