Mervace Working Magnetic motor using induction feedback

[Merv]

I have only posted to Stefan s web site here... overunity DOT com is something completely. Where's your sence of humour omnibus.. don't dismiss my efforts even though it was 15 yrs ago.. Allcanadian and mramos  are thinking about applications. Executive Toy   Remove the battery and youve beat the Swing Art Mobile .But is there any point ?   You need a sence of Humour if you read some threads on this website  & I haven't even looked at Anti Grav Yet.. does anyone have pictures of Finsruds machines? Creations...

[peter_schmalenbach]

Dear Merv,

why do you not give us the plan and the construction details of your device?

What's the reason?

Didn't you register your device as a patent until now?

We only want to build up 1 sample for our own use, for improvements and study.

Have a nice day.

Best regards
Peter Schmalenbach

[Merv]

Hello again Peter and Stefan.
I have just read the description of Finsruds machine. I?m sure you have all discussed it in here in the past. If the device sits in an artist?s studio it must be Art imitating science. Or perhaps mocking it. Surely the addition of a couple of randomly pulsing electro magnets within the described chaotic pendulum part of the machine would be enough to maintain random movement of the pendulum.
Look at the device from the inventors point of view  . He has worked  for years at making a little steel ball move round  in a circle ,built a machine to achieve this task with 90% efficency ,Then continues to fine tune it to produce 99.99 to 100% efficiency. How much easier is it to start with 110 % and work backwards? The Author John Pasley  creates the impression that he feels privileged to have had the opportunity  to view the device, felt that there might even have been a drop in room temperature  while in the vicinity  of the creation and its creator. The machine just felt right. Like Pythagoras theory.  He then gives us Mr Finsruds  world view of things. And ends his report by saying he has absolutely no idea how it works. My argument can easily be dismissed by saying I have missed the point completely. Yet the machine continues to sit in a basement in Norway. The effect achieved by this is a lot more than just a ball turning in a circle. These are  just my own immediate impressions of that article, surely someone in your threads would have came to similar conclusions or am I just posting in the wrong forum    .Peter  I respect entirely the work you are doing . I think I understand from your videos what you are trying to achieve. But do you  really believe you can get more than one revolution of that Ball?  Now you ask me why I do not give you the plan of my simlpe motor?. I await your reply. Regards, Mervyn

[gyulasun]

Hi Mervyn,

I would like to know why you wrote in your video Part 2 that the Torbay motor would never work?
You think it is hoax?

thanks

Gyula

[peter_schmalenbach]

Hello again Peter,

I respect entirely the work you are doing . I think I understand from your videos what you are trying to achieve. But do you  really believe you can get more than one revolution of that Ball?  Now you ask me why I do not give you the plan of my simlpe motor?. I await your reply. Regards, Mervyn

Hello Mervyn,

my device is not yet finished.

The start of the circle is stage 15 and the end is stage 14. I still must excactly adjust these stages. But then the other stages change their features (characteristics). It is very difficult.

Then it could be that the ball rolls continuous.

Today I have received a letter from SIEMENS in Muenchen (Munich). They are interested in my device.

Please look at my new video. The ball now has more speed.

http://www.schmalenbach.de/video3.mpg

Best regards
Peter Schmalenbach