THE RANT ROOM

[WhatIsIt]

I admit that you superior to all of us.
And smarter, and decades in front of us,
and nobody has better logic than you,
and so on and on.

You satisfy now.?

You are the smartest man I ever met in my life.

Will you stop disparage members on this forum now.

[NickZ]

   Lanca:   You have mentioned many things and ideas that are common in current science. Yet, not one quote, nor patent, nor idea, of Teslas. Our greatest inventor. What did Einstein invent, and prove? He was given recognition, while Tesla died broke. Not to be heard from, again. Don't you find that strange? Well, I do. Teachers are told what to teach, and students are told not to question "science".
   Current science will not answer the questions that we are looking for. Nor will it even acknowledge Tesla's achievements, nor teach them in school. Except where it serves them, and even then will not mention where such an idea, or patent came from. Why???   Kapanadze, our greatest inventor of free energy systems, does mentioned where his ideas come from. You got it. Tesla. While some people try to proof that both Kapanadze, and Tesla are wrong. Yet can't replicate what Tariel has done, and shown many times over. Sad, isn't it.

[lancaIV]

NickZ,Tesla is a SI-,unit,so you can not say that Nikola Tesla is not scientifical remarked !

Much ideas in the scientifical "universum" from the last century became in the last decades approved,I do not see a need to critizise several scientists by their work,especially not if their theoretical results has been experimental approved and repeated !

Tesla in his last years became an outsider,from industrial view,the  cooperation "divorce" with Charles Steinmetz let him loose the ground for further industrial developments !

Developping prototypes is one thing,to develop an industrial mass production process with relyable mass configuration numbers and by same production quality and quantity,warranty-able, a harder way !

For this N. Tesla was the wrong,less genious,talent !

And probably some from Teslas developments are scientifically to find in Thomas Townsend Browns inventions,one who worked ( we can also speak about "observated" him ) with Tesla in his last years !

The quantum mechanic and nuclear sector are the both sides from the same coin,when I look for the Kapanadze and similar devices I think in atomic bomb and reactors their operational " moderator"  and its  function as initiator of the " chain reaction" !
By nuclear devices we know "the fuel",by electrodynamic devces ?
Humidity(h2o) ,atmospheric oxygen to ozone ?

Sincerely
OCWL
ps.: Einstein et cet. are the media-idols fom the "atomic age",but there are many others -the mainstream less known- digital age pioneers !The " digital cyberworld" is the applied "SpaceTime"-niversum

[NickZ]

   You mean like a digitally controlled atomic bomb? You think that Kapanadze or Tesla would agree with you?
Quantum physics may need another 100 year to reach what Tesla had known and proved. What did Einstein actually prove? That atomic bombs are possible to build, yet did nothing of the sort, himself. Explosive, destructive, poisonous, radioactive, science. Look what they've done. There is now enough power to destroy this planet, and everyone in it. Great achievements.
   Now it's up to us to PROVE that Tesla was right, and Kapanadze was right, as there is no one else that will. The current tech will not even believe that it can be proven. Yet, hide all that type of technology under our noses.   Are black holes, whirlwinds, tonados, and the rest of space based on natural functioning "chain reactions"?
Is a vortex a chain reaction?
   Scientists like Tesla, are usually not good sales men. And sales men are usually not good scientists. 
   Are we looking for mass produced products, as yet. You can look, but you won't find. For the reasons given previously.

   Elon Musk is a great sales man, and he preferred Edison, to Tesla. He is now wanting to be the greatest sales man in history. And he is. Now he is selling everything he owns, and is putting his money, where his mouth is. 

   Just wait,  and remember that this is a free energy forum. It's Not about quantum physics, religion, or Geopolitical issues.
Which have not and will not show us what we really need to know, at all. Such as how to extract energy from the ambient, without needing to create more devastating nuclear power plants, nuclear satelites, or weapons of "MASS" destruction, etz...   
   NickZ
   

[lancaIV]

NickZ,about which specific device by Nikola Tesla you are talking ?

Dr.Einstein did not invent the nuclear energy technology,here we would have to discuss about Otto Hahn and Lise Meitner !

Dr. Einstein got his merits for the scientific description about "photoelectric"(included A.Nobel award) ,something as basic renewable energy device from te 20th century.The first " photoelectric" device in use more than 50 years back the theory disclosure !
Now in the 21.century we enter the E=hv state ,Max Planck Quantenmechanik level,where not only photons but also phonons~ thermalnoise,becomes converted ! And as reversible process device !

We are not talking about sales men and their vending technique but about production technology science,which has nothing to do with the sales department !

Science= knowledge about object material physics,object re-/production technology ,object macro-/micronizing !
And today : climate effect research !
Material N? purity ? Material doting ? Thermical behaviour graph ! Efficiency parametric ! .........

Civil or military use :

Phonon ~ sonic technology and as we heared in the last months also here we have the military version :hypersonic rocket/ missiles

Digital "cyberwars" are also not anymore unknown !


It does not help to know that by shortest "recombination time in picoseconds" we can/could trap free electrons,these nano-transistor devices has to become developped and built :
an example for the production level in density number NovaSolix , 1 Trillion rectennas per square-inch