THE RANT ROOM

[TommeyReed]

To all the salesman on this Holcomb or any other device on this forum!

I have seen too many people on this forum selling BS, this is and should be a open source.

I like many others are believers in open source, I invest my time and money trying to develop a system that use less or even if possible free energy.

This is not about the $$$, this is personal.

If anyone does design and try to market a true free energy device, do you really think the world governments would let you sell it to the world? I don't think so!

Trillions of dollars are created with energy every year, not you or anyone else would be allowed to bankrupt this world.

The love of money is truly evil to the core, wars are fought for oil because it can produce so much energy and other products.

Nuclear power has even been used to create $$$, even when they claim it would cost pennies for electricity in the past; we all can see the cost of energy today has sky rocketed.

Third world countries are the real loser today, we are so lucky to have energy and yet people on this forum are looking to sell energy.

I realize there are many on this forum who are looking to steal a idea to make a dollar, open source would be the best way to counter these snakes!

Tom

[SolarLab]

Tommey, 

Some company (made up of people) has to design it, develop it, buy parts and stock them for it, 
build a factory to house the people and parts stock, give the employees bennifits, heat/cool the place,
provide flushing toilets, sinks, lunch room; buy, calibrate, maintain fabrication equipment, test 
equipment, loading dock, pallet movement vehicles, employee pensions, health care, soap, janitorial 
services; warrantee, repair, advertising, insurance, .... etc. The list is very long as you must know.

This all costs money!
Trying to do one by yourself is nobel - but it will not help those that can not do it.

A factory mass produces them, buys parts in volume for reduced costs, markets them, supports them,
installs them (contract or otherwise), developes newer, cost reduced/better performance devices, etc...

The looser is everyone - if it's "Open Source!"

No, it IS ABOUT $$$$ - becouse without them only a very few would have access to these devices - very few
so "open source" would be extremely selfish - would you not agree?

No common folk would do it - not because they didn't want to - but because they couldn't!

I could "open source" it to you under the agreement you would supply two trillion units to the world - free, agree?
And, it has to be delivered and installed, for free, and repaired, for free - hey everything is free!


You must see that, or not!

[SolarLab]

BTW

Once the unit is obtained (purchased, probably because some one had to
purchase the material to fabricate it and some one had to actually fabricate
it, ship it etc.)

Now you have abundant energy, free - except how's the city going to pay
for water, sewer, roads, street lights, stop lights, parks, etc... without a Tax on power consumption to help out a bit.


Maybe the city can get some free infrastructure funding and find employees
that will work for free.

Hey, who knows - but I won't die my hair pink just yet! 

[bistander]

Maybe you could point out exactly where the error is!

Thanks in advance...



SL

I referred to the video you linked.

Here's a couple of PM's from Ramset.

Maybe you all can help me out in deciphering them - he's a phone guy apparently: 

Hate to just write him off as a fruitcake so I ask your help!

====================================

NASA METER - review before getting into the Ramset (possible BS):
https://www.facebook.com/holcombenergysystems/videos/nasa-recommended-meters-confirm-incredible-hes-performance/3299516646991635

====================================

...
SL

Kind of a stretch calling them NASA meters. Just appears that the clamp is vacant on one, or both. I think the camera angle purposely excludes clear visual confirmation of clamped lead. Towards the end of the clip, the way he handles the meter, hardly seems as though it has a phase lead from a 20kW load clamped, does it?
bi

[SolarLab]

I referred to the video you linked.


Kind of a stretch calling them NASA meters. Just appears that the clamp is vacant on one, or both. I think the camera angle purposely excludes clear visual confirmation of clamped lead. Towards the end of the clip, the way he handles the meter, hardly seems as though it has a phase lead from a 20kW load clamped, does it?
bi

Review this video (the original) - full length about 4:35:

Gene testimonial video:

https://vimeo.com/user81692192
The meter is a German PCE; PCE-PCM1 (about $240),
The spec sheet & manual are on the PCE web site 
(check out the certification price as well - about $700, follows the instrument by lab)
NASA uses COTS when ever possible [certified].