THE RANT ROOM

[scratchrobot]

Basically
This particular incident has absolutely nothing to do with what you just posted here.

false accusations were made against longtime experimenters and replicators here.

and those false accusations [as well as very disruptive behavior]
led to this result.
it you have any questions on terms of service here

read it again.

respectfully
Chet K

I read it again and if you register to this site: 'you agree, trough your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false'.


This is no incident, this whole forum is full of false OU claims!

[ramset]

Scratchrobot quote



I read it again and if you register to this site: 'you agree, trough your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false'.


This is no incident, this whole forum is full of false OU claims!





@ Scratchrobot

Your point is well taken, the example which lead to the result mentioned here by administration was more personal conduct violation and breaking laws .

Libel against members here {lies, fraud claims etc etc] as well as very poor behaviors within the forum]other violations of etiquette ]

Scratchrobot
your position here has merit and you argument cannot be dismissed ,but we do dismiss such everyday ,and we all look at it as
"ongoing investigation of claims"

its what we do here.
I know other forums do not allow unsupported claims ,and will change tittles of threads to avoid other types of liability issues.

here I cannot comment any further .

I personally have nothing but gratitude and respect for Stefan's accommodations here.

respectfully
Chet K

[citfta]

I just found this thread so am kind of slow to respond.

First I want to thank Stefan very much for dealing with Zephir.  He truly was a serious disruption to this forum.

@Scratchrobot, I understand what you are saying about the misleading titles on many of the threads here.  It also irritates me that anyone would make claims that are not true.  However I think in a lot of cases the person starting those threads actually thought they had some kind of free energy or OU.  They were just too inexperienced to know how to really test and verify what they had.  And that is one of the purposes of this forum: to test and verify claims of OU.

Another thing to consider is the idea of truth in advertising.  What I am talking about here is that not everyone sees things the same.  Here in the U.S.  a pizza company had as their slogan "Better ingredients, better pizza, Papa John's.  They were sued by another company for claiming they had better ingredients. The judge ruled they could continue to use that slogan because he said that whether the ingredients were better was up to the consumer to decide.  The judge ruled that claims can be made in advertising as long as they are not blatantly wrong.  So if someone claims to have OU it is up to us to use our own knowledge and experience to prove or disprove their claim.

You have been here long enough to know if the claims turn out to be false the poster usually gets roasted and leave on their own.  Or in some cases like Zephir get the boot from the admin.

There are a couple of posters on this forum I would have gotten rid of long ago because their ideas are clearly wrong, but in the interest of letting everyone have their say I suppose they don't really do any harm because I think most of us just ignore anything they post.

Respectfully,
Carroll

[SeaMonkey]

All of the forums are quite interesting to read and evaluate
as they present much "food for thought."

Sadly, there are on occasion postings which reveal more
about the "builder" than they reveal about the target
of the attack.

These are the sorts of postings which are indicative of an
underlying state of imbalance.

What is one to think?

[AlienGrey]

All of the forums are quite interesting to read and evaluate
as they present much "food for thought."

Sadly, there are on occasion postings which reveal more
about the "builder" than they reveal about the target
of the attack.

These are the sorts of postings which are indicative of an
underlying state of imbalance.

What is one to think?

That the guy is at his wits end possibly pissed off perhaps.