THE RANT ROOM

[stivep]

Answer #1

stivep,
Opinions is one thing, but claiming something works without knowing the facts is another issue.
Tom

Tom I didn't disagree with you..  in the sense of an intentional action to get money from the buyer .
I think you didn't read my comment carefully  enough - to be delicate.
I only said that  an opinion  makes a buyer . 
Buyer made mistake  on his own.
and

Stupidity is not a cause but the consequence,

Please read it again  please.

Wesley

[SolarLab]

Tommey,

Great, glad we got that cleared up:

- you didn't loose $50K; since Holcomb didn't answer your Youtbe Video comment about verification.

Sorry if I mis-read your post; sometimes they're interpretation is not that clear for me.

Who are "we" - We evaluate methods and techniques (some patent claims as well) using Professional CAE; 
as an independant entity.

Please find attached the "DNV Verification Report" - there are others, as well, from what I understand
but to get a full picture you could always contact A-HES, HES or Holcomb directly or through your
Investment Adviser.

Your choice to purchase a unit when they become available on the market is entirely yours, of course!

Have a great day!

SL

Attached: DNV Report dated 2019-11-04.

Solarlab,

"If, in fact, you did get taken for $50K (through your own stupididy, or not) we might be able to
recover a good portion of that $50K back to you:", can't you read? I never said i invested any money!

Who are we?
Do you work for Holcomb?
You clearly are being either dishonest of who you are and what your true motive really is or just another salesman who are on the Holcomb train to get $$$.
Which is it Solarlab?

I would never waste a dime in this Holcomb device, I see the false claims from the start. I said my friend invested 50k, but I did warn him about the lack of independent verification like Department Of Energy and NASA!

I also asked Holcomb on YouTube comment, if the Department Of Energy or any company in the USA verified their claims. Never got a answer back!

Tom

[lancaIV]

DNV GL AS as international technical consultance ,DNV = Det Norske Veritas +  GL= Germanischer Lloyd :
Above verification report from 2019
Now,since 2021,only DNV
https://www.nomentia.com/de/referenzen/dnvgl
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNV
wmbr
OCWL

[stivep]

Answer #2

stivep,
Opinions is one thing, but claiming something works without knowing the facts is another issue.
Tom

I do not understand what is wrong  with your English Tommey.

Please read  again this:
https://overunity.com/17252/the-rant-room/msg580732/#msg580732
than this:
https://overunity.com/17252/the-rant-room/msg580735/#msg580735
and that what I'm writing below in the Simple English -American English specially for you.:

1. You are ABSOLUTELY right  that   no product should be sold that  is or it represents  ADVERTISED non existing quality /
2.  If  your friend  signed document  revoking his rights to quality and performance than he can not get money back.
Wesley

[bistander]

Answer #2I do not understand what is wrong  with your English Tommey.

Please read  again this:
https://overunity.com/17252/the-rant-room/msg580732/#msg580732
than this:
https://overunity.com/17252/the-rant-room/msg580735/#msg580735
and that what I'm writing below in the Simple English -American English specially for you.:

1. You are ABSOLUTELY right  that   no product should be sold that  is or it represents  ADVERTISED non existing quality /
2.  If  your friend  signed document  revoking his rights to quality and performance than he can not get money back.
Wesley

Than is used in comparisons as a conjunction (as in "she is younger than I am") and as a preposition ("he is taller than me"). Then indicates time. It is used as an adverb ("I lived in Idaho then"), noun ("we'll have to wait until then"), and adjective ("the then-governor").

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/when-to-use-then-and-than#:~:text=Than%20is%20used%20in%20comparisons,the%20then%2Dgovernor%22).

Picky, I know. But there is a simple fix.
bi