Why this seesaw is working against physics laws

[sm0ky2]

The real issue with See-saws comes into play when you
consider Momentum.


Mass in motion, at whatever velocity, will have its own
Energy equations, that include energy from the gravitational
Field.


A lot of people get hung up trying to "grab" that.
A tiny imbalance can set motion to innumerable mass
Now you have a numerical conservation of energy problem.


And you can spend a lifetime of debate over it.


But none of the debators will take the Archer Quinn challenge
And stand under innumerable mass see-saw with a pebble on your end.


100 lbs can lift 100 lbs.
100 lbs + 1 gram can reverse the situation
You can lift extra any amount >1gram to regain the energy of your gram.
And also you have the momentum of
BOTH halves of the See saw crashing into whatever is under it.


See more at www.howthermodynamicscanblowme.com

[vikram_gupta11]

Hello sir,
The velocity of mass is equal to velocity of box.but at the time of falling down the velocity of ball will be increased.it means the kinetic will be increased.
At the time of tilting the box velocity will be 0 but ball velocity will be not 0.

[vikram_gupta11]

You say 100 lbs can lift up 100 lbs and 1. Gram can reverse the situation but 1 gram cannot lift up 100 lbs and reverse the situation.
But in this mechanism the less mass is lifting up heavy mass.

[vikram_gupta11]

At the time of tilting the box + ball velocity is equal but at the point when ball start to falling down then box velocity is 0 but ball velocity has been increased.
If I drop a 10 kg ball from ,1 meter height .it will never get it's previous height but in this mechanism the ball is getting it's previous height.
If ball would slide in the box then there would be no gain but the is falling down (Free fall)at the time of tilting and reversing despite loss of energy due to impact.
So what is this if it is not overunity?
I have already mentioned that the arm length is only 80 cm but if I take a 2 meter long arm then I can locate center of mass above fulcrum.
And no doubt the arm will get its original position without any external influence.
I am interested in Free fall of ball.

[sm0ky2]

If the height were 80cm
10x0.8/0.1/0.1 =800 Joules




Impact force of ball = 9.8 N


Kinetic energy gained by ball = 96.04 Joules


If height is raised, so is time of fall.
Time is important because it is s^2 in the equation
The longer the fall, the more acceleration.
Greater impact force, and greater kinetic energy change
for the ball.


Also greater input to lift ball.


If lift is leveraged, force x distance of lift decreases.
Thus total change in energy becomes more favorable.
At some height, with some leveraged mass:
There is a mathematical gain in kinetic energy.
This is because the gravitational constant is altered
by the lever, but not the free fall.