Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[rickfriedrich]

Brad,
It is true that OU cannot be confirmed through the internet. But you ignore the FACT that hostile Chet, and so many others here, scolded me for not showing a Lab testimony. Then Chet tells me what Lab to use and they had already had the very results I mentioned here. This is rather ironic isn't it? I mean, I wouldn't blame you if you didn't believe Chet as he admits he has no ability to evaluate electrical technology. And why would his statement from people at that Lab mean anything to anyone else who did not witness such things? Well at least this should shut him up from all those condemnations. Yet it hasn't apparently.

Again, it really doesn't matter what is shown, demonstrated, etc., because you guys all have an agenda here to silence and disprove OU. Data is meaningless unless you were there to fully observe it and know all the parts, equipment, and environment. You are a joker Brad, you need to read a book and learn what science, evidence and proof is. Indeed you are right when you say this about yourself: "The only treasure that was delivered was an empty chest."

Moderation was not based upon doubting anything but because of repeated abusive attacks as far as I could see.

Do you have the all-seeing-eye Brad that you know that: "Not one single device or person you and Rick keep quoting has a self running OU device". I showed a video of a guy that demonstrated just that. That is evidence for a self-running OU device. But somehow you determine what is fact. You are everywhere and know everything so that you can create your own reality I guess. You spend too much time in fantasy so that you can't even tell what the real world is. Apparently you really believe this and so you are actually deranged.

So now my claims have died. Yeah, that's why we have 156,000 views on this thread about just a few of my claims. The nothingness is from the likes of you and others that never respond to my points but just make empty statements like OU is impossible, You didn't do this. You can't do that. You don't know anything. Bla bla bla.

But on the contrary, there are many people who are watching and benefiting from this one-sided exchange. Several of you, especially you, have lost your credibility completely. Guys who followed you from the beginning. Guys who know your back story and why you are acting this way even. They are very disappointed with you Brad. The Tinman lacks a heart.

I am very glad that I have damaged all the Troll activity from you guys here. That is why so many people are cheering behind the scenes. This forum has been mostly useless because you guys, and others before you, have controlled it with the sole purposes of suppressing OU research. That is the purpose of OUR as well apparently. It is now a proven fact well demonstrated in these last 100 pages. The views here show how significant this is. Your desperation to counteract that also demonstrates this. If you were correct that I have shown nothing and have said nothing important then all of you would just have moved along, Trolling as usual. But no. You admit that I ruined all this trolling. I answered all the questions again and again you guys didn't answer my questions. You pulled every trick in the book. You lied, twisted, deflected, and even reveled in using red herrings! You have been completely closed minded. You even apologized several times in the middle of this. This is all desperations Brad. Maybe you are fighting so hard to keep your job and suppressing OU? Is that the case Brad? I mean, why are you here making such a fool of yourself over and over again?

You lost everyone finally when you took the gullible credulous position in denying the following after all that has been said:

POINTS HAVING BEEN PROVEN SINCE JUNE 2019:
1. OU Claims and Disproof OU Claims Cannot be Proven Over Video, Pictures, and Words Over the Internet. People Can Only do Science and Prove Truths of Demonstration to Themselves In The Real World.
2. Forums Can Only Provide Information to Other People which Needs Personal Verification Unless it is Self-evident.
3. Free Energy and Over Unity Do Not Imply Self-running or Self-looping, while the Inverse is True.

author=a.king21 link=topic=17491.msg538360#msg538360 date=1565653726
Lies
No OU has been confirmed.
Please post link to confirmed OU device,where accurate measurements have been made.
The one's that should have been moderated are those making claim's,but could never back them up with real data.
You have no confirmation or proof of an OU device.
You live in la,la land.
No,you were wrong.
Oh yes,we have all seen what you had part in,and that was getting good people moderated because they questioned Rick's claim's--along with your own.
Rick has nothing,and has shown nothing.
The only treasure that was delivered was an empty chest.
Oh please.
At OUR you  stated you couldn't even measure the power in and out in your own system,and now you claim to be building a Don Smith power waster.
Not one single device or person you and Rick keep quoting has a self running OU device--and that's a fact.
Rick's claim's have died--no one is interested in 100 more pages of nothingness,and that is all you and Rick have delivered.
In fact,you and Rick have done more damage to Stefan's forum than anyone else before you's.
This forum lost a lot of great experimenters due to you and Rick.
Thankfully at OUR you were put back in your box before it got out of hand.
Brad

[lancaIV]

Mister Friedrich,  not meaning OU but better efficiency performance :
you wrote to get the torque doubled( by same input !?)!
How much torque/Nm per Watt or VA ( AC or DC or pulsed DC )?


http://www.chorusmotors.gi/technology/index.php

Other electric motor high torque claimer :
https://peswiki.com/directory:electric-motors


"... can outperform any existing electric motor now in use or undergoing testing by a factor of at least 1000 in terms of torque out for watt in ,...." 
http://maddsci.tripod.com/george/id11.html

James A. Dinnan ,Georgia ( University Professor ?)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=TW&NR=200627764A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=20060801&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

Table 6.  3-phase motor
Before 552 Watt per hour               later with " concept" implementation : 182 Watt per hour

Heat pump with/out Meta C motor C.O.P. ?                   

                                     Jakelj                       

                                    Chorus

[a.king21]

author=a.king21 link=topic=17491.msg538360#msg538360 date=1565653726


Lies
No OU has been confirmed.
Please post link to confirmed OU device,where accurate measurements have been made.

Ramset confirmed it

You have no confirmation or proof of an OU device.
You live in la,la land.

No,you were wrong.
Ramset confirmed it

Oh yes,we have all seen what you had part in,and that was getting good people moderated because they questioned Rick's claim's--along with your own.

[/font][/size]
I had nothing to do with anyone being moderated.  Another Tinman wrong assumption.

Rick has nothing,and has shown nothing.
The only treasure that was delivered was an empty chest.


At OUR you  stated you couldn't even measure the power in and out in your own system,and now you claim to be building a Don Smith power waster.

That is because in my book when you have no input you do not need to measure. 

Not one single device or person you and Rick keep quoting has a self running OU device--and that's a fact.

Rubbish.

Rick's claim's have died--no one is interested in 100 more pages of nothingness,and that is all you and Rick have delivered.

In fact,you and Rick have done more damage to Stefan's forum than anyone else before you's.
This forum lost a lot of great experimenters due to you and Rick.
Thankfully at OUR you were put back in your box before it got out of hand.

WAS I?
Let's examine Itsu's results:-



" Post by Itsu on OUR :  concerning the charging of a battery using the HV of the big coil, it went nowhere, so i removed the 3 satellite coils surrounding the big coil.

Now some more HV is available to charge the battery as the charge current went up from 2.2mA to now 6.53mA.
The voltage went up in a few hours from 12.83V to now 12.87V.

Hopefully this extra power is enough to start "conditioning" the battery.

By the way, the input to the big coil / gate driver is now 12.59V @ 12mA (was 7mA with the 3 satellite coils).

Itsu
Running overnight, the charge battery is now at 12.92V (@ 6.48mA) and the primary battery at 12.56V (@ 12mA).

Itsu "

So let me see:  In put battery went from 12.59 volts to  12.56 volts a loss of -0.03 volts.

The charging battery went up from 12.83 volts to 12.92 volts a gain of               + 0.09 volts

You also detected that the battery did not increase in temperature.  That means it was charged by cold electricity as a battery should increase it's heat signature when charged.

So we have an overall gain of +.06 volts.

These are your figures according to your highly scientific test.

Obviously the batteries need rotating for at least a month to ensure the results are accurate..  But it's a good start....



You are looking stupid Brad....

[citfta]

I posted this on OU.com but apparently it needs to be repeated here.


Aking,

Those small changes in voltage mean NOTHING!  You seem to know almost nothing about battery chemistry.  Voltage level of a battery is a very rough approximation of what is going on with the battery.  A few degrees of change in the room temperature can make a difference in the battery voltage.  And conversely a minute charge current of only a few milliamps will not raise the temperature of a battery.  The only accurate way to gauge what is going on within a battery is to use a battery analyzer which measures the capacity of the battery and the internal resistance of the battery and gives a much more accurate reading of the charge level of the battery than just a voltage reading.


It is statements like yours and others from Rick that make those of us with real electronics experience just shake our heads.  I am not meaning to put you down but you really need to take the time to properly learn about electronics and in this case battery chemistry if you want to be taken seriously.  I don't at this point see any hope for Rick but I am hoping that with enough time you will wake up to the real world so that you can seriously study and work toward OU if it is possible.  I believe it is, but have yet to find it.  Unfortunately I have seen enough of Rick's word salad to know he is not leading you in the right direction.  I at one time was also led down the garden path by Rick's mentor John Bedini and his cohort Erron.  My own research and study and years of experience helped my to see they were leading me in the wrong direction.



Respectfully,
Carroll

[a.king21]

I posted this on OU.com but apparently it needs to be repeated here.


Aking,

Those small changes in voltage mean NOTHING!  You seem to know almost nothing about battery chemistry.  Voltage level of a battery is a very rough approximation of what is going on with the battery.  A few degrees of change in the room temperature can make a difference in the battery voltage.  And conversely a minute charge current of only a few milliamps will not raise the temperature of a battery.  The only accurate way to gauge what is going on within a battery is to use a battery analyzer which measures the capacity of the battery and the internal resistance of the battery and gives a much more accurate reading of the charge level of the battery than just a voltage reading.


It is statements like yours and others from Rick that make those of us with real electronics experience just shake our heads.  I am not meaning to put you down but you really need to take the time to properly learn about electronics and in this case battery chemistry if you want to be taken seriously.  I don't at this point see any hope for Rick but I am hoping that with enough time you will wake up to the real world so that you can seriously study and work toward OU if it is possible.  I believe it is, but have yet to find it.  Unfortunately I have seen enough of Rick's word salad to know he is not leading you in the right direction.  I at one time was also led down the garden path by Rick's mentor John Bedini and his cohort Erron.  My own research and study and years of experience helped my to see they were leading me in the wrong direction.



Respectfully,
Carroll

If you read my post fully I concluded that it  was a good start.  I added that the batteries would have to be rotated  for at least one month to be sure.  Do you not agree with that analysis?