Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirmation of OU devices and claims

Started by tinman, November 10, 2017, 10:53:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Thaelin

Carol:
     The scope was used as a meter to read the high voltage probe. Had he kept going, the output would have exceeded what the scope is capable of. Like what I did to my Tek scope. Very nice scope but not any more.

forest

I agree about Q factor, but there is slight problem here : why Q factor is a gain , energy gain ?  What is your theory ?

forest

cifta
My blind guess....(wonder how much I missed the point )  - the input was kind of combined series and parallel resonant circuit working *together* with output resonant circuits in *secret* mode , so the  power (to leds) was full or partly real at output yet the voltage in input circuits raised when each output coil was added. The same I saw explained by Ruslan Kulabuhov. That's reasonable explanation of scope damage

citfta

Quote from: Thaelin on June 17, 2019, 02:24:11 PM
Carol:
     The scope was used as a meter to read the high voltage probe. Had he kept going, the output would have exceeded what the scope is capable of. Like what I did to my Tek scope. Very nice scope but not any more.


Now I am even more confused.  What high voltage?  I thought he was lighting up LEDs?  And you and he both have said the power input to the primary coil was going down.  So where was he measuring high voltage?



Respectfully,
Carroll

citfta

Hi Forest,

We both posted at the same time I see.  If your explanation is correct that means we have only been told part of the story.  Because all I keep reading is that the input current kept going down when more secondary coils were added.  I don't remember anyone saying anything about the input voltage going up.  Maybe I missed that or it was conveniently not mentioned.

If in fact the input voltage rises as the secondary coils are added that would make perfect sense for a tuned resonant circuit.  What I mean is that as coils are added the total inductance is being raising which is shifting the frequency response and thus the input signal will see a higher inductance and thus a higher voltage will be needed to overcome the increase in inductance.  We get that from the old school saying about inductors and capacitors :  ELI the ICE man  which is a convenient way to remember that voltage leads current in an inductor  and current leads voltage in a capacitor.   The inductive reactance must be very high for Rick to be afraid of blowing a scope connected to a high voltage probe.   No wonder he is afraid of people getting hurt messing with his circuits.

Thanks for your input.

Respectfully,
Carroll