Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirmation of OU devices and claims

Started by tinman, November 10, 2017, 10:53:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

rickfriedrich

Haha, it's funny as my most significant work is with manuscripts. I'm honored to have my words on here to be considered such  ;)
Well none of you can accuse me of taking sides as I will call anything what it is even with my friends.
Yes it is an important study to consider different frequencies in the way you mention. That is the same as my teaching about being very sensitive to understand your entire environment. Very small things can also have influences that people don't generally think of. Even our own bodies. I have no comment on your points however as I am very much in the fact gathering stage of that research but I am aware of what you mention.
My point applies to me as well. That was a major point I was trying to make, and also in the latest video. You can't trust anyone until certain things happen. Credibility is impossible to establish when it is entirely online. We all take a risk buying something online, but it is not much of a risk when we have insurance or credit cards that will give us our money back under certain conditions. When we buy products all the time from the same place then we trust it. Still, anything could happen and change things. When we meet someone in from cyber fantasy land in the real world (outside of the matrix haha) then it can make a difference. Sometimes we can meet people who have met people and more credibility is added. People in cyberland can establish credibility by teaching self-evident things and help people succeed. Talking on the phone is also sort of half-way has good as meeting someone in person. In regards to me, I think it is fairly obvious to everyone who I am in the circles. Pictures of me in real life big events with hundreds of people in association with my company convention events and with my products I have been selling since 2007. My public work goes back long before this as a publisher as well. None of this means much because anyone can be mistaken, and no one who is accessible is really an authority. I know people that are not accessible who have the knowledge and experience to be such. But in cyberworld it is almost a joke, and the chit chat is laughable by those in the know. Maybe Eric Dollard would be the best you could get, but he really isn't in cyberworld as he hates the digital. If I'm wrong someone list some worthy names. I'm certainly not one as I'm just am amateur hobbyist backyard mechanic philosopher. lol I can make these things work but I don't claim to know the exact nature of all the phenomena or have decided upon the correct math to represent it all.
Anyway, you just have to keep yourself from assumptions. Gather information as working hypothesis while evaluating what you think is most relevant. See for yourself. That's all I'm saying. Yes all these "persons of influence" that are set up on the forums to be people confirming or disproving people's claims may have powerful influence but it is actually a bad thing. This is just setting up another false authority. I have talked to many of these guys and ask them the pointed questions. They seem nice, and sometimes I actually meet them face to face in their den or mancave shop. Many of these guys have suckered well-meaning people into supporting them. So these guys get paid to entertain people like mythbusters. They use keywords effectively, and give out some useful information. But when I consider what they have done over years I find it fairly useless in regards to what people are really asking for and needing. So don't believe the hype. Don't follow the masses after people.

What matters? That we chat without ever having any real life experience? That is what I'm talking about. That is merely fantasy. I'm a realist and don't have time for fantasy.

Yes, what is dielectricity? Dollard makes some good points, and you can see that there will always be some mystery about it. Many things I do not expect to fully understand the nature or essence of. But we can find the characteristics and relationships that are predictable and repeatable. We just always have to avoid the "nothing buttery" reductionist fallacy. And that is my point, don't reduce something to one commonly used application of it. This is what happened from Maxwell on. Convenience and profit has created what we have now as "mainstream" practice and dogma. This is all just special pleading of a special case of the larger reality....

Quote from: AlienGrey on June 20, 2019, 03:22:56 PM
Quote from: rickfriedrich on June 20, 2019, 02:26:34 PM

The reply editing window is so small it's useless when editing Rick's manuscripts!


As for my 180Khz bigger coil demo, this was just me making a random coil that was almost equal lengthwise with width which results in good Q.

I don't know if you have noticed but some frequencies yield different amplitudes and are more audio pleasing and are considered in tune with the planet and universe or is it to just some humans I say this as the Nazis didn't like bas 9 ie 432 and changed it to 440hz witch is base 8 witch is demonically oppressive.  You might have noticed DS device he said he used 31kh5 this is a base 9 frequency.
=======

Yeah, it isn't wise to follow people who are in cyberland and could be anyone. Who makes anyone an authority? What science authority is someone we should absolutely trust?

Well that depends some what if they are a 'cyber-man or not, aren't you in cyberland?
And it realy depends on if that some one in cyberland is in sync with what's going on about what's missing and then there is always experimentation.


As for AG, I'm still not really understanding your context from your words. Maybe take a little more time to specify what you are staying. While it is true that you can get excess energy out of the external environment around any wire passing any current, it may not be worth the effort in parts/collectors/converters to process that gain. On the other hand it is worthy of doing with any high frequency transmission line, or any transmission line that is being impulsed very sharply. The former is the idea I often demonstrate at my meetings as showing the Don Smith dipole system where we tap the Heaviside flow. The latter is where we deal with the Tesla one wire system as partly illustrated with the wrongly called hairpin circuit but which is more fully expanded upon in figure 5 in The True Wireless paper. This I have been showing in my third stage process (black box) for many years now, and which Bedini taught about rightly in DVD7.
Yes some of these processes the magnetic kills the effect.
So I guess people need to experiment and learn these things. Lots of talk. Plenty of sensational videos and claims, but unless we personally experience these things then what does it matter?
Because it does matter, is it the fact that a capacitor is charged with dielectric energy It takes time known as the rise time, but dielectric energy is fast perhaps even longitudinal energy.
AG

rickfriedrich

Thanks Mario,
You have to take some time to properly understand what Tesla was doing. Unless we understand his system as completely different than AC and DC we will misunderstand how to do what he did.
When done right then you can keep on adding as John said. Again, I point you to the first three lectures and figure 5 of The True Wireless. Don't assume it is merely a coil in series. I show running many coils that were not even matched or in resonance (last meeting I showed 11 such random parts from my products) and yet they still substantially increase the output as well as send energy back to the input. You watch as each module with it's load causes the voltage across the transistor or fet to rise (until it exceeds the maximum SOA). I once saw that go as high as 5000V.
Now if you take the time to understand how Tesla's processes actually work in the single wire transfer then you will learn of all your options and that you can create many branches or single wire outputs from one prime mover. There is no limit to the network that can be associated. So maybe their start up another thread on the other forum Nick Tesla too good to be True. Or John Bedini too good to be true or to be noticed. Now in regards to what Bedini was doing, it was a negative impulse so it is not a mass thing. You are assuming otherwise that is why you think there has to be a limit. Those assumptions are why people didn't want to do negative energy engineering. So we only really gave out the battery as a load. Not me, as I gave it all to you over many years. I showed it with the batteries, and how you could get more out with bigger batteries. I showed it with transformers and inductors and all kinds of lights. I even showed this also on the trigger side. But I found that people didn't care, or at least they got what they needed and moved on. But the true negative unidirectional wave impulse tech was not really taught on these groups. As I mentioned, even Aaron's SSG 3 part manual had nothing of this because he either didn't know anything (which seems manifest, but I don't really know him to say), or he didn't want you all to know it. Tell me, could you really call anything else advanced SSG teaching? This is unlimited in output. What was advanced or intermediate in those books? There is one short thread on this DVD7 and you see they missed the teaching and also the sentence where John claims you can add as many as you want. Yet I think this was all just a game with John. Even with EFTV book, these kinds of things were only for inhouse people. For John it was that you had to earn it.
Your second paragraph misunderstands this process. You have to get beyond looking at Tesla one wire as some current thing with positive impedances.
Third paragraph again assumes same things. I think one thing these forums have shown after all these years is that you look at unique free energy processes with mainstream assumptions that you will dampen them and not get anything. Your understanding about these processes is all wrong. For example, if you do not have a load, and the right load, you will blow out the input. "Everything has to be in balance."
There are many different things you can do once you understand Tesla. Remember, Tesla's one wire was the entire globe (or disc if you are flat earther :o ) in some cases. Size is not a problem.
You do not have to have high frequency either. You can do very low frequency so long as you have a very fast rate of change. Then you have understand what matching impedances mean, along with matching loads. Not necessary but understanding the variety of options is helpful (which I have mentioned).
Now what we have been talking about with the resonance kits also is similar to this. Don Smith said that at radio frequency and above (say above 20cps) in resonance we have no resistive losses. So we can do the same sort of things with a series of parallel tank circuits rightly coupled. Some of my students have posted videos of doing just that with the coils in a similar way as I did with many coils without wire connections. Chapter 1 is two wire connections. Chapter 2 is Tesla's 1 wire (which is what I am referring to here) and chapter 3 is wireless transmission. So with suitable tuned circuits you can do the same sort of thing as we do with the motors with the negative impulsing. 

Now I'm not telling you to revisit this. It just so happens to be the most important thing that Bedini ever taught on and which all the present forums have missed. It just so happens that is the most important thing that Tesla taught on and is the key theme with many free energy systems. I have observed that people studied Tesla's work with AC and then they skip over the one wire work as if it is unnecessary because of his wireless work. But without the one wire teaching you will not understand his wireless.

Now this also relates to Don Smith's DSE or Don Smith Effect. He gave a very poorly written two pages on the subject years ago and made a comment at the end that it was "moron level" of understanding required. So it was funny the other day when two of my students had these things finally click and they boasted that they had finally arrived to the moron level  ::) ;D You see, they superficially understood the idea but all of a sudden it sank in and the "got it". And that's how it will be for everyone who finally gets it. It will not be a gradual learning more about it. It will just suddenly click as you realize how you have been looking at all this completely wrong. You have to remove your classes and all the assumption lenses and make one have a dielectric filter and the other have a magnetic filter so you can behold all this as it really is and not the way you have been trained to limit reality to be. Like all of a sudden seeing color when you only saw shades of grey. Like seeing 3D when you only understood 2D.

Quote from: popolibero on June 20, 2019, 03:59:02 PM
Hello Rick,
I did pay attention to DVD7 when it came out and did quite a few experiments with solid state SG's and coils in series but didn't have much success back then, then I went on to work on other things. But resonance has always fascinated me.
In such a one wire setup, isn't there a limit as to how many resonant coils you can put in series? I mean, say you have HV cap as a source dipole and you switch it with abrupt impulses to your line with the correct frequency to resonate all the series coils in the line. Say the caps voltage is 1000V. This voltage would get divided  by the number of resonant series coils in the line. So, if you have 10 coils, each would be a resonating node at 100V max, right? But maybe you could put more resonant coils in parallel with each series coil?
Also, to get the power out of each coil, I don't think the way shown in DVD7 is a good method since putting the load (lamp or FWBR to cap) in parallel with the resonant coil as shown would hinder or greatly reduce resonance. Wouldn't a resonant coil with a step down secondary be much better? Or a series bifilar resonant coil with a low impedance load in the middle (the coils internal series connection). These are just some thoughts as I wouldn't mind give it another go, but I was wondering what your opinion is about these points.
thanks,
Mario

AlienGrey

Quote from: rickfriedrich on June 20, 2019, 08:08:40 PM
Thanks Mario,
You have to take some time to properly understand what Tesla was doing. Unless we understand his system as completely different than AC and DC we will misunderstand how to do what he did.
When done right then you can keep on adding as John said. Again, I point you to the first three lectures and figure 5 of The True Wireless. Don't assume it is merely a coil in series. I show running many coils that were not even matched or in resonance (last meeting I showed 11 such random parts from my products) and yet they still substantially increase the output as well as send energy back to the input. You watch as each module with it's load causes the voltage across the transistor or fet to rise (until it exceeds the maximum SOA). I once saw that go as high as 5000V.
Now if you take the time to understand how Tesla's processes actually work in the single wire transfer then you will learn of all your options and that you can create many branches or single wire outputs from one prime mover. There is no limit to the network that can be associated. So maybe their start up another thread on the other forum Nick Tesla too good to be True. Or John Bedini too good to be true or to be noticed. Now in regards to what Bedini was doing, it was a negative impulse so it is not a mass thing. You are assuming otherwise that is why you think there has to be a limit. Those assumptions are why people didn't want to do negative energy engineering. So we only really gave out the battery as a load. Not me, as I gave it all to you over many years. I showed it with the batteries, and how you could get more out with bigger batteries. I showed it with transformers and inductors and all kinds of lights. I even showed this also on the trigger side. But I found that people didn't care, or at least they got what they needed and moved on. But the true negative unidirectional wave impulse tech was not really taught on these groups. As I mentioned, even Aaron's SSG 3 part manual had nothing of this because he either didn't know anything (which seems manifest, but I don't really know him to say), or he didn't want you all to know it. Tell me, could you really call anything else advanced SSG teaching? This is unlimited in output. What was advanced or intermediate in those books? There is one short thread on this DVD7 and you see they missed the teaching and also the sentence where John claims you can add as many as you want. Yet I think this was all just a game with John. Even with EFTV book, these kinds of things were only for inhouse people. For John it was that you had to earn it.
Your second paragraph misunderstands this process. You have to get beyond looking at Tesla one wire as some current thing with positive impedances.
Third paragraph again assumes same things. I think one thing these forums have shown after all these years is that you look at unique free energy processes with mainstream assumptions that you will dampen them and not get anything. Your understanding about these processes is all wrong. For example, if you do not have a load, and the right load, you will blow out the input. "Everything has to be in balance."
There are many different things you can do once you understand Tesla. Remember, Tesla's one wire was the entire globe (or disc if you are flat earther :o ) in some cases. Size is not a problem.
You do not have to have high frequency either. You can do very low frequency so long as you have a very fast rate of change. Then you have understand what matching impedances mean, along with matching loads. Not necessary but understanding the variety of options is helpful (which I have mentioned).
Now what we have been talking about with the resonance kits also is similar to this. Don Smith said that at radio frequency and above (say above 20cps) in resonance we have no resistive losses. So we can do the same sort of things with a series of parallel tank circuits rightly coupled. Some of my students have posted videos of doing just that with the coils in a similar way as I did with many coils without wire connections. Chapter 1 is two wire connections. Chapter 2 is Tesla's 1 wire (which is what I am referring to here) and chapter 3 is wireless transmission. So with suitable tuned circuits you can do the same sort of thing as we do with the motors with the negative impulsing. 

Now I'm not telling you to revisit this. It just so happens to be the most important thing that Bedini ever taught on and which all the present forums have missed. It just so happens that is the most important thing that Tesla taught on and is the key theme with many free energy systems. I have observed that people studied Tesla's work with AC and then they skip over the one wire work as if it is unnecessary because of his wireless work. But without the one wire teaching you will not understand his wireless.

Now this also relates to Don Smith's DSE or Don Smith Effect. He gave a very poorly written two pages on the subject years ago and made a comment at the end that it was "moron level" of understanding required. So it was funny the other day when two of my students had these things finally click and they boasted that they had finally arrived to the moron level  ::) ;D You see, they superficially understood the idea but all of a sudden it sank in and the "got it". And that's how it will be for everyone who finally gets it. It will not be a gradual learning more about it. It will just suddenly click as you realize how you have been looking at all this completely wrong. You have to remove your classes and all the assumption lenses and make one have a dielectric filter and the other have a magnetic filter so you can behold all this as it really is and not the way you have been trained to limit reality to be. Like all of a sudden seeing color when you only saw shades of grey. Like seeing 3D when you only understood 2D.
So don't under stand fig trees with monkeys in them cus we know what they are full off.

rickfriedrich

This is either you trying to dismiss what I wrote as a joke and/or not being able to properly translate your words into English. Whatever it is, it is lost in translation  :o

Quote from: AlienGrey on June 21, 2019, 08:18:41 AM
So don't under stand fig trees with monkeys in them cus we know what they are full off.

ramset

AG  instead of writing hieroglyphics and sideways insults perhaps you should allow those who are spending much time and effort here....the opportunity to continue...
insults and derogatory comments do nothing but drive people away...
but you already know that ?? 

Chet K
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma