Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[endlessoceans]

     Sorry, but that's it for me on this thread.     I don't need all the BS.    NickZ,  over and out

My thoughts exactly.  Its an advertisement thread for kits anyway

[a.king21]

There is something I have been thinking about for several days now I just still don't understand.  Some comments have been made that have said the voltage across the input coil keeps going up when more secondary coils are added.  And Rick has confirmed this.  Also comments have been made that the input current keeps going down as more secondary coils are added.  And the claim has been made that the power keeps going down as secondary coils are added.  But if the voltage is going up while the current is going down that does NOT mean the power is going down when secondary coils are added.  That only means the circuit is becoming more inductive which is increasing the inductive reactance.

The other question or puzzle for me is how is the voltage across the primary coil going up?  The only schematic I have seen in this thread is the one posted by Itsu.  And if i recall correctly the primary was being fed by a power supply so the voltage to the coil would be fixed and thus not able to go up.  So something just doesn't add up there.

And the last thing that is puzzling me is what is meant by the term "Gate Driver".  I keep hearing that term used in the videos and by others as if it is some secret circuit that is making all this magic possible.  I know what a gate driver is in real electronics.  It is just a simple chip with a circuit built into it that supplies the proper signal to drive either a mosfet or IGBT.  I have used them for years.  But what is the "gate driver" referred to in this thread?

Respectfully,
Carroll

Gate driver:  We are using the gate driver with no transistor!!!  It is being used to directly drive the Tx coil in series. It therefore gives a sharper impulse than the square wave frequency generator on it's own plus it acts as an amplifier.
Voltages in this set up go crazy when you get a magnetic lock.  The input power can go right down as you add more loads because  each coil is creating its own magnetic field.
The higher the input voltage to the gate driver  the greater the magnetic fields.  That is the whole point here. As you move the coils about sometimes one coil goes "out" and acts as an amplifier to a coil further afield.
It does not conform to Kirchhoff's laws. It is not a closed loop system.
Hope this helps.

[rickfriedrich]

Mario,
No. Reread my quote from Tesla yesterday on Impedance where the so-called hairpin circuit is talked about.
"These results, as I have pointed out previously, should not be considered to be due exactly to frequency but rather to the time rate of change which may be great, even with low frequencies."
Now you can see why I have been jumping up and down about this. This is a whole different kind of energy. This is not pulsed dc, because it is not DC.

There are many options here, but the results will not be what you think. This is something you just have to experience. The problem with merely thinking about it is that you think only in terms of current flow as AC or DC and this is not either.
Yes the parallel is different but it is essentially belonging to the same family of ideas. There are minor differences in these various arrangements.
No comments yet about the transverse arrangement, which is probably the most perplexing to people and most significant as it allows endless networks to be created...

Hi Rick,
thanks for sharing this video, very interesting. There is something I'm trying to figure out. Let's say that out of the receivers in fig.5 or fig. 12 of the true wireless I choose a coil. In Tesla's example the coil is placed across the one wire transmission line (in parallel), without interrupting the one wire, which in my opinion means that the frequency has to be very high in order to get a node across these two connection points of the wire. Now, in dvd7 the inductor is inserted into the one wire, not in parallel, but in series, and the reason for that I suppose is to "slow down" or allow for a lower frequency to produce a node across the coil with the correct rate. So, in a sense in this case the coil is not the actual receiving device but replaces a piece of wire to allow for lower frequencies. The receiving device then would be the FWBR and cap. Am I seeing this correctly?


thanks,
Mario

[rickfriedrich]

Wow Nick you are something else. This was a private video that I made available to you guys. What you say is very revealing of who you really are here. Man, this was a very significant demonstration to these people. You have a motor running for one hour with 200W LED loads running at times and the input battery never changed!!! And you call that a couple of insignificant bulbs. Yes you never watched the video I can see as you just gave up watching as you revealed. Now who is the fool here??? For those who want to understand this process this is the most important video on YouTube. You have never seen the real deal. That setup actually ran all his shop lights all the time and the battery always stays the same. You are a real piece of work Nick. You guys make a big deal about believing claims for or against something which I said cannot prove anything. So I show you guys something that you want and so you just insult me. Obviously you are some distractor here to turn people away from significant things. I have explained many supporting reasons for this process and you just ignore it because you don't like me and/or don't want people to find these truths. It is interesting how vicious people get when you show something so important. And I really don't care if you are offended because the specific details were not revealed. I have already pointed you to Tesla on the variety of ways you can do these things. Don't be lazy man, take the time to learn about resonance and impendence matching and figure these things out yourself. I already have given everyone the basic way of doing this without tuning which gives much multiplied output. Grow up man.

    Guys:
   I looked at that last video posted by Rick. Sorry but, that noisy thing lighting up a couple of little led bulbs, was not impressive, as it was offensively loud, instead.  I remember why I could never could fully view any of his posted videos before.
   I would not want something like that running in my house. I hope that he can show something better, and quiet.
Otherwise, solar panels would blow something like that away. Without any noise, easier to set up, and probably cheaper per watt output than what they are showing there. Sorry but I could not handle the noise, nor could view the whole video.

   Rick: We are not all idiots here. We already know about what we should or should not trust, in video or forum discussions, and don't really need you reminding us of the obvious. Even though you think that we do need your guidance on that, we don't.
  Then afterwards, you show us more videos to look at. But, say that the real deal will not be shown, as it's a secret, and proprietary.   Ok, I get it now...

[rickfriedrich]

This was just showing what could be done with the motor. It doesn't need to be a motor.
Anyway, as I said, this was used to power all his lights in his shop while the battery did not discharge. It is a small setup for producing over 1000W of continuous running while self-running. This is what all of you have been demanding for years. Now I have unlocked this mystery and what do I get. Insults from Nick. Shows who he really is. He doesn't want anyone to know how to do this. This is a desperate attempt to get people to disbelieve anything to do with me. So what are you here for Nick?

Hi NickZ,
Rick has shown what is in the box. Look at Loving Path Series (Zero Voltage Process).
It is to noisy..haha.. Where is a problem, to build a small box that dampen it. You can also do it with one Wire. All Informations about how to do you can find in this discussion.
What is the next problem? It is to big? it looks like not supercool? I can not believe it.