Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[itsu]

Thanks Guys, for the trusts,  but i find it amazing that anyone would doubt any results a replicator would present.

Of course anyone can make a mistake, but thats where the video's are for so anyone can see what is being done.
If you think something is wrong it can be discussed and corrected.

Anyway i always try to keep my posts short and clear so won't comment on it any further.




A.king21,


i tried the last days all kind of combinations for the 12V led bulb connected to a satellite coil for abnormal
cooling.

Grounded the big coil,  grounded the satellite coil, grounded both, satellite coil inside the big coil, outside,
etc. but the temperature of the bulb stays about 1°C above ambient.

I will continue for some days, while building 2 additional satellite coils.


When i have 10 satellite coils i will put them around the big coil and once again try loopback via the
supercap stack for a final attempt to have it maintain itself.

Itsu

[seaad]

Thanks ITSU for your efforts.
I'm hoping that you will use resistances instead of LED's in this coming test.
If you are using the satellite coils as before in parallel resonance it is obvious that these in the resonance situation are best conformed wih high Ohm resistors or anyhow with other very HIGH Ohmic loads as they go extremely high Ohmic then.
A parallel resonance circuit loaded with LED's will only be "clamped" mismatched and the Q-value totally destroyd.
You can also then skip the FRB's.
[[ Maybe a high Ohmic (load)resistor before two in opposite direction LED's is maybe a choice that also gives a visual option. ]]

Regards Arne

[gyulasun]

Hi overcurrent,

Please understand that the inventors you listed had different devices from the one we are discussing here. 
And most of the members here do not reject overunity this forum is dedicated to, this is why most of them are
here to find such setups.

The closest to this energy transfer by series LC TX circuit magnetically coupled to satellite LC RX setup under
discussion here would be Tesla's magnifying transmitter. You surely know that Tesla wrote about only a few
percent energy transfer loss when using the Earth as the conductor for electric current while he considered the
wireless energy transfer done by broadcast through the air as a very lossy system. And Morgan stopped financing
Tesla the moment he realized he could not put meters at the customer side to milk Tesla's energy transfer system. 

If someone would figure out a device with which he could power his house and this would be revealed to the utility
providers, he would very likely be punished in many countries. But you could easily disguise your setup by building a
wind generator or solar panel array of a certain size, even use a grid tie inverter to feed back energy to the utility mains
and you would keep silence on your real device.  After registering your solar or wind source with a grid tie inverter to
the utility provider, they will not bother about you.   Or you use your device to supply say 2/3 of your monthly energy
consumption and you pay for the rest. All I mean there can be several options.

Gyula

I don't know, it is something I have wondered for a long time. Are they all liars Tesla, Morray, Newman, Meyers, Searl, Wagner, Hans Coeler and the list goes on and some as Searl and Meyers have done jail time but does that mean they were all liars or is there a true conspiracy to keep it all under wraps or is it human greed I don't know for sure yet after 15 years of looking into this stuff. This is part of why I don't even experiment with some things such as energy from the sky or ground because what if you did figure it out and powered your house from the ground do you really think you wouldn't just be thrown in jail for stealing power.

[overcurrent]

Hi gyulasun

Thanks for the reply, it does seem a sad state of affairs if hiding it would be the answer to such a wonderful thing for humanity as Tesla said todays is theirs and the future for which he worked would be his but I don't know if it will be in my lifetime. Anyway I think I am off topic and will say no more on the philosophy and leave the thread to those doing this great work. I tell you I haven't been to this site so much as when this thread started I love it and I do plan to get expirementing on this but I will need to start further back in Rick's teachings to get up to speed.

[gyulasun]

Hi Arne,

While I fully agree on the use of resistors, notice that they do have self capacitance and inductance which
should already be considered at the 180-200 kHz range when using them as loads. There are special, 
non inductive resistor types for the many kOhm ranges but they cost more money though.

Normal metal film or carbon resistors could be used if one such receiver unit with its kOhm resistor load 
would be measured whether the current through the resistor remains in phase with the voltage across it 
(the latter is the resonant LC voltage itself of course).

It is possible the inherent, even small reactances of metal film or carbon resistors can be embedded in the
LC circuit, so no or negligible phase shift in the current versus the voltage would happen. 
By checking this, reliable power outputs can be had then. 

As is known, maximum power transfer is insured by loading the resonant LC circuit impedance by the same value
load resistance.  This is simple to test: the resonant voltage amplitude across the RX LC tank gets halved when
the load resistance equals the unloaded LC tank impedance.

@overcurrent
Okay and I wish you good luck in experimenting.

Gyula

Thanks ITSU for your efforts.
I'm hoping that you will use resistances instead of LED's in this coming test.
If you are using the satellite coils as before in parallel resonance it is obvious that these in the resonance situation are best conformed wih high Ohm resistors or anyhow with other very HIGH Ohmic loads as they go extremely high Ohmic then.
A parallel resonance circuit loaded with LED's will only be "clamped" mismatched and the Q-value totally destroyd.
You can also then skip the FRB's.
[[ Maybe a high Ohmic (load)resistor before two in opposite direction LED's is maybe a choice that also gives a visual option. ]]

Regards Arne