Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[web000x]

There ae some considerations in doing Cole's circuit. You have to give enough time between the phasing or you will have problems.
This circuit was never intended to be self-sustaining but we did show a video where the one motor ran for 20 minutes off an amplifier capacitor. That would probably take under 30 seconds to normally discharge. So it is cycling around the energy like Cole wanted. It is always better to charge an external battery and rotate it, but if you want something to just go a whole lot longer then that is a simple way of doing that.

Which brings me to the point I just made in the last post to Void of truth: Why is self-looping the only thing of value to these people? This arrangement has a lot more appeal in the present world that does not believe in perpetual motion. Charging up a battery much less frequently is accepted by everyone and is a great way to disguise such free energy processes. And of course that has long been done...

[/font]Void of Truth,I don't need help with self-looping. I have been doing that for 15 years now. You have entirely missed what OU is as I have pointed out. I have long demonstrated self-looping. Everyone has long been invited to see public demonstrations. Even in Germany I invited Stefan to come 5 years back. I have also worked with many EEs and engineers all over the world, some of them at the very top of the ladder in the biggest companies and military. So your condescending words don't change that fact. These people can obviously do measurements to the satisfaction of their respective companies and all EEs. But they are not such fools as to think that could be proven over the internet. What you write sounds like it has substance until people realize that you are talking about doing this in a scifi movie reality show. You are not talking about the real world. I live and test in the real world. You just play games behind a screen. I understand how my systems work, you don't. I see them working for years with or without batteries. Batteries get better over time, with real gains in capacity. I guess I can't believe that until you make a video showing your meter on it. hmmm sounds a little unreasonable. I never came here to prove anything. You want proof of something. Get off the computer and have a good look in the mirror and ask yourself why you call yourself Void!

[/font]


Hello Rick,


In an attempt to clear up some confusion, I would like some clarification on your idea of 'self-looping'.  I was at the 2011 Renaissance Charge Conference in Coeur D' Alene, Idaho.  I spoke to you at one point asking you about your Bedini inspired devices.  The topic was the batteries.  I asked you if you ever had to recharge your primary batteries or if you could keep them fully charged with rotation.  You were very reluctant to tell me, but did say that you needed to top the source charge off on your batteries with an external charger on occasion.  This was only 8 years ago.  You say you've been self looping for 15 years.  My understanding of self looping would be a self sustaining system, no more input from you, the operator.  Can you define self looping in the context previously stated by you?  Does your definition of self looping involve adding external energy to the system on occasion?


Thanks for the clarification,


Dave

[a.king21]

    Listen carefully:  I have watched his long drawn out videos, and still don't know all the details that I mentioned in my last post. It's hard to watch a two hour video, and harder yet to have to watch 3 hour videos, about his opinions, without careful measurement to go along with it. But, I did watch it. LOL.   Yet, you say "it's all there". Really?
    So, A, now that you know all that needs to be done and are familiar with his devices, videos, and chats, and are up to speed, why don't you show the results. Like itsu has done. Perhaps you can show some actual gains. That would help. As most of us have watched at least his more relevant videos, and still don't get it. But, getting it, is not the same showing it working as a OU device.
   Kapanadze also has a patent. Did that help to produce a working replication? He also talked about the cause of free energy, yet, no one can replicate what he has shown many different times, as yet. So, perhaps you can tell us what is missing? And show some gains that can be measured and replicated. As battery swaps and noisy motor devices are NOT what this thread is about.

I am thinking about if I want to get involved for the next 6 months or not.  I took a two year break and came back rusty but soon got up to speed. I am wondering whether to open up a thread on the Ukrainian Don Smith device or not. So I am thinking about it. ie Kapanadze is a Don Smith copy in my opinion

[ramset]

Here a snip from Wesley note book today  this quote from anonymous
_{I've been in contact with Georgia University staff in Tbilissi
so it turns out the Tabatadze family were the inventor of the device.
The Kapanadze family just stole the effect, maybe improved not sure
but what is certain via my network in republic of Georgia, it was G. Tabatadze
who first made the prototype which appear to extract energy from AIR}.

On the other topic..the new thread your starting ....are you serious ? The _contrary_  Koala asked _"you"_  four ......... maybe ten times.[I couldn't hear it that well.....
I've never seen that before ...not even one time [I think]
and look at the beautiful "Uke" thingy he built ...soo much work done.... Look at that presentation !!!
Might even be a movie...?

https://overunity.com/17491/confirmation-of-ou-devices-and-claims/1305/EDIT
and look below....the crowd gathers...would be cruel to deny the masses...they've already suffered the loss of itsu and Partzman ...and Hoppy is .................

[AlienGrey]

TK could you please explain the what looks like shorted copper winds please

[TinselKoala]

TK could you please explain the what looks like shorted copper winds please

Simply the top and bottom (or left and right) terminations of the coil windings. I have experimented for years for the best way to terminate high voltage, high Q helical resonators and for this particular project I tried this method, which works well. I used heavier copper for two turns on either end of the fine wire winding. This allows the fine wire winding to stay tight, without bends or kinks or sketchy terminations, and provides good contact for experiments and circuit connections.
One more time: If you want to discuss this project PLEASE somebody start another thread on it. I certainly don't want to distract from Rick's teachings in this thread.   
This was almost the last thing I was working on so it is near the top of the pile of junk on my workbench. It might not be too hard to dig it up. The problem is, as mentioned earlier, it is a fairly powerful Slayer/Kacher self-resonant RF transmitter with substantial E-field component, and it will interact negatively with sensitive electronics in the vicinity, of which I have too much sensitive stuff and not very much vicinity. I have another, much more powerful and interesting thing waiting in the wings to demonstrate also, but other things have intervened and I haven't gotten a "round tuit" yet.