Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[Void]

Maybe Mark Dansie is close enough to pay a visit. But these days he seems to be more interested in serious investigations with real possibilities, rather than this kind of thing.

Well, if he allows people to come and view a demo in person (as he apparently already has) and inspect for
any hidden wires around it, and if it can run a kW of loads for say 8 hours with no issue, then I would say
that would be a good test. Until something like that is done, I would say it might be jumping the gun to completely dismiss it. 

P.S. Based on a comment I read, it looks like a familiar situation here where Joel Cas Raras says he doesn't have a patent
and that it works on a simple principle, and he wants investors, but is afraid that once the secret
of how it works is out he will will be shunted aside, so he is very reluctant to make a deal with anyone.

[NickZ]

   TK:   I've sent you a PM, please check it.
   Itsu is not part of our forum members here now. But, seams to still be able to post PMs here. Although of that, I'm not too sure.
   NickZ

[NickZ]

1-Is it possible that YOU made an error in your schematic that I copied and that appears in the video?
It could happen .. or even you not full understand the prupose of the circuit .

2- Is what you sent to Jeff Dove really this circuit? How can we be sure?
Yes i send him the original.  You only need to ask him and you will hear their answer

3-Did you also send him the power _transmitter_ that nobody wants to talk about?
No , i did not send because simple not exist . You should not need to send , but receive that is the goal .

4-Is it possible that _this_ is really a mini radiant exciter?:

No just a kacher circuit or some type of variant

   
   Nelson:  Can you please explain (again), the difference between your circuit, and a simple Exciter/Kacher circuit?
   I am still very interested in your circuit(s), if that particular circuit can self run, or produce OU.   

[WhatIsIt]

Rick reinvented radio station. Which he presented here.
Maybe he has something, but that part he will never diaclose.
He wants everyone to follow him without question.
God complex! To beg him for something we never saw.
I saw his car, but not runing, just parked while he made long speech about it.
Probably is same with the boat.

He promised video in which he will help step by step how to achieve results he claims.
That video never showed up.

I dont know for the others, but this story becomes hollow and Harry Potter like.

Ocam's Razor:
If Rick has something, he will not be here teachong for free.
His gadgets are not free and I can say little bit expensive.
If he really has a boat runing for three years, power companies and oil giants would depart him from this world long time ago.
With his statements he is running with the flag, begging powers on top to crash him, melt him and make him dissapear into the night.
But nobody is touching him because he is not danger for them.
They know how much he has.
So, everyone can conclude what is going here.

Stop begging and make your own circuits and devices which can be better than his claims.

This forum lost few good members because this.
It doesnt have to be like this!

[ramset]

Void..I see Tinsels recommendation above ..on Mark D I just checked distance from Dansies posted business to your fellow in San Pedro
seems within 50 miles or so ??
will call Dansie tomorrow and let him know
I must add ...these guys with serious claims who are not open sourcing ..they Make Mark sign contacts that would keep him and his family broke for generations if he revealed the results ...
suffice to say ..usually the scammers won't allow him to test once they realize the extent he goes to.
and that info [a denial to allow a no cost to the inventor investigation would be enuff for a better understanding of this fellows  claims ,to be clear we are talking black box no secrets revealed demonstrations..where secrets are not even revealed to the investigators.
I must add ..he told me in the 100 or more investigations he has done...
not one  ...........

but he did mention years ago [prior to this call I made to him about IEC a few weeks ago] an ambient harvester he was invited to see ... that had given him pause it had serious limitations and  low wattage collection [30 watts ??]

??
also a note about a person who I will not write his name here anymore [or wants others mentioning here] ...use PM here for correspondence ...membership in full operation.and circuit viewed from this topic.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I see Tinsel posted a reason which I was unaware of...for leaving Peter's forum
I had thought an issue with the IEC topic and lawyers or lawsuit concerns on Peters forum as the reason    To clarify its Not really allowed at that venue since Bedini came there and threatened Peter with lawsuit 
the  bedini name was not allowed to be written after that..and great care taken to not subject the host to such REAL THREATS ever again.America has way too many Lawyers looking for money...Peter runs his forum on his dime no advertisingand works unbelievable hours to make ends meet.and yes that is absolutely one reason that not every topic or investigation is on a public thread ..Liability to the host.but to insinuate that the forum keeps secrets from the open source community.. would be a kick in the groin for Peter and all that toil there .The rule is you don't work in Peter's house with out an open source Plan for that work. end of story

My comment to AG was one of a behavior that he does from time to time not realizing how it looks to readers !
he intimates a higher knowledge and makes no effort to explain.[why members here Take issue with Rick..]
happens quite a bit ??
I regret writing that now ,but at the same time happy for TK response and clarity ...