Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[lancaIV]

Overunity-Motivation and the limit :

https://www.shutterstock.com/de/image-illustration/donkey-running-after-carrot-518056597

[TinselKoala]

(snip)
Tinsel  has shown many times all the ways you can fool people if you were an unscrupulous individual or even at times persons unaware innocent of their measurement error
(snip)
Respectfully
Chet

Thanks for the flowers. But... not nearly "all" the ways. Just the ones I know about, have fallen for myself, or can dream up. One thing I do know for sure: someone will always find a new way to fool, or try to fool, someone else for money or fame.

One important thing I have noticed over the years as I've examined various electronic OU claims. Many of them have turned out to be fairly good wireless power _receivers_. I have a number of wireless power transmission systems in my lab, among them the turnkey "Black Box" which is an EM system, quite safe and not interacting with the environment except for powering more-or-less tuned receivers. I always test circuits claimed to be "OU" in some way by exposing them to the emanations of the Black Box. The "Lari-Man Objekt 13" is one such example. It operates perfectly well when near the BB, with no other power source. Ditto some of the Akula and Ruslan circuits. Especially if you gut the electrolytic capacitors and stuff button cell batteries in the cases!
I also have E-field wireless power systems and hybrid RF systems, but these are more dangerous because just about anything in the environment can become a receiver. With sufficient power,  dielectrics like window glass or wallboard can accumulate shockingly large charge patches, conductors like metal shelves start spraying corona, dogs run and hide, et cetera.

[overcurrent]

Well I would think dogs would run can you imagine the charge they could build up in that fur coat. All right that is my last post today too many beer have a good one.

[a.king21]

AKing someday I hope he open sources information that leads to a heretofore
unknown anomaly which withstands all scrutiny and can bring Stefan's mission statement here to fruition .
to help all around the globe ,not just one lab or lifestyle.
Chet K

But he has open sourced everything.  You just have to sit through his videos.  What we could do with is someone to liase with Rick and Hong Kong to produce those multi coilers 10 times cheaper along with his very effective battery rejuvenators. I think that would make a difference.

[a.king21]

Hi overcurrent.

I'm pretty sure most of the older hands here cut their teeth on " Bedini " tech.

One member, currently under MODERATION, Hoppy carried out exhaustive battery analysis over a very long period of time, he'd be the one to help answer your question.

I built several motors over the years, one ran for around 3 months, single battery and mechanical commutation with no " apparent " loss. Very efficient but otherwise, useless, as no extra energy could be had without upsetting the fine balance.

Not wishing to deter you in your endeavours, tinkering and a " hands on " approach is a great way to learn about this fascinating subject. Don't forget that there's many here that have already " beaten " this path, quite thoroughly, don't be afraid to ask questions.

Definitely, " Solar " is a good investment, I've just passed the 0.9 MWh in three months!!

Cheers Graham.

Yes, but what Bedini did not tell us (which Rick outed) is that you could have charged several batteries and still ran your motor for three months. That is what he did not want us to know so he had something up his sleeve which he could sell later.
In an oscillatory set up the batteries' ions would potentialize  by voltage only and would self charge.  That is why the ions would keep charging the batteries after switch off. This means that your battery woud increase in voltage after switching off the charging circuit  - which is the opposite of conventional charging.  Also your batteries are charged cold and even colder than ambient in some circumstances.