Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[citfta]

Hi you lot  lets stand back a moment and ask what are the risks ir Rick F comes out and declares full blown that he has free energy devices in kit form for sail hmm?

This site is open to any one to view on the plant, and only recently John Badini and his brother have left the planet under mysterious
circumstances and then you have Steven Greer talking about free energy devices being directly related to the existence of ET's and anti gravity and the 'Men in Black' appearing out of know where in open spaces and using so called death threats
and inventors disappearing or eradicated ect.
I mean would you behave much different to Rick Richard M Fried Hmm for F sake ? be realistic so if it works or not you ain't going
to get proof with the way things are!

That's strange idea to post since Rick has already said in his video that you could power the input with the power from one of the outputs.  So he is already claiming OU.  But he refuses to offer any evidence to support that claim.  I am not doubting there are those that don't want free energy or OU to be widely available to the masses.  But Rick's videos so far don't support his claims of OU so I don't think he has anything to worry about.

[seaad]

About

VOID:  I can tell you this. If I had a setup which I thought was showing OU, I would 100% try to self-loop it. 

Here I got som tip's from lancaIV once:

https://overunity.com/17279/split-flux-transformer/msg528437/#msg528437
https://overunity.com/17279/split-flux-transformer/msg528443/#msg528443

And I started to build and test these.

Re: Split Flux Transformer
« Reply #55 on: January 09, 2019, 11:52:50 PM »
Quote
Today I have conducted some tests with the aim of better accuracy and comparison.

1) I did first a test with the original 5 leg trafo measured with both my Fluke multimeter and with my Oscilloscope. See below.

2) Then a test with a Special 5 leg trafo where the two cross flux legs (U-cores) are fitted between the primarys and the secondary.
This rises the output voltage but lower the OU effect!

3) And at last a test with a normal transformer konfig,.

All tests are at 10 kHz.  And the load resistos are chosen so they reduces the free "swinging" output voltage to about halv  that voltage,  in all tests.

1a)  5-leg               FLUKE      IN:  1,95 V   0,95 mA     74 degrees        OUT:  1,162 V    107,1 %                        10KHz      Load 2469 Ohm
1b)  5-leg               SCOPE     IN:  3,4 V     3,4   mA     74 degrees        OUT:  2,04 V      105,8 %     1,68 mW      10 kHz     Load 2469 Ohm

2)   5-leg  Special   SCOPE     IN:  3,37 V  3,0 mA       70,4 degrees      OUT:  2,72 V      104,75 %    3,56 mW      10 kHz     Load 2080 Ohm

3)   Normal trafo    SCOPE     IN:  3,11 V  10,85 mA    58,25 degrees   OUT:  2,99 V       98,9  %      17,56 mW     10 kHz     Load 509 Ohm
 

   percent Efficiency


I tried to loop 1 a, b) with a single BC -transistor after that (but I don't remember exactly how).
Kick started it with a short sinus burst and it oscillated then for 15-30 seconds.

The two input primaries (5-legged trafo) can be series or parallel
All coils 100+100 turns,  0.3 mm (#28).
(And it dosn't matter that the coils are much wider than the cores, only for test purposes here. Tighter is better of course)
Cores : KÖNIG ELECTRONIC FAT100, Smooth blank ferrite

This is confirmation-of-OU-devices-and-claims
Is this OU? Try it!

Regards Arne

N.B.  No LED's !!!

[TinselKoala]

In all fairness, and giving the benefit of doubt to RF, I believe his statement from the video says that he can power the _frequency generator_ with output from one or several receiver coils. But recall that the FG is just supplying the clock signal to the mosfet driver chip, yes? And the main power being switched by the mosfet driver chip is coming from a power supply or battery, am I right?

So the claim isn't actually a claim of complete self looping, if he isn't claiming to power the _whole system_ from just the output of a few coils. That is, if I am interpreting his statement correctly. All he is claiming is that the frequency generator itself can be so powered.


But I still don't think he can do even that.


Please correct me if I am wrong! I would be very happy if RF is actually claiming to be able to run the whole system from the output of one or several receiver coils... because I know for sure he certainly cannot do that!

[Raycathode]

Well this works Dr Sriffler used this device at one stage https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DmAyYhnRgc
I even got it to work with a sig gen and some leds and some re wound Ferox surplus ferrite rods, some of the other guys at work were impressed.

Raymondo

[TinselKoala]

Got what to work? I didn't see anything remarkable or unusual in that video, other than the rather...er... sketchy measurement methodology. And of course the schematic does not seem to be available any more at the given link.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9wxuRZV-Ro

But is it OU?