Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[seaad]

People are wondering where I am. Well I really don't have the time for this right now. I only lingered on for so long here because I had to bring things to a completion. I spent way more time on all this than I should have. I don't regret it, but I have too much business to attend to to worry about these little children playing games. It's been really funny at times. But it just goes nowhere. If I come back in another 5 years I'm sure everyone will be exactly in the same places as before. Maybe moved on to another personality.

[rickfriedrich]

Another reason for using those LEDs I have mentioned before, is that they show sensitive changes. My objective was not OU demonstration with this kit but was for people to learn the topological relationships that T. W. Barrett addressed that were truncated from the original Maxwell equations. Skeptics here just want to limit themselves to the truncated math and linear relationships while pretending to be open to over unity science. The LED works fine for seeing subtle changes. And once you understand that you can move on to bigger systems. But jumping ahead without taking the time to learn the principles of free energy will get you nowhere.

Again an assumption without any facts.  If you could be BOTHERED to go to the video, Rick disconnects his camera and does closeups on the coils so you can see the leds lit.


And here is another fact. Rick's leds are much dimmer than comparable leds, which is why I swapped them for superbright leds.
However Rick's leds are more durable.  I have only lost one of Rick's leds but several superbright ones.  If you make a supposedly scientific comment then you should double check your science or you do not come over as credible.

[Void]

POINTS HAVING BEEN PROVEN SINCE JUNE 2019:
1. OU Claims and Disproof OU Claims Cannot be Proven Over Video, Pictures, and Words Over the Internet. People Can Only do Science and Prove Truths of Demonstration to Themselves In The Real World.
2. Forums Can Only Provide Information to Other People which Needs Personal Verification Unless it is Self-evident.
3. Free Energy and Over Unity Do Not Imply Self-running or Self-looping, while the Inverse is True.
These points are settled because of my contribution to this forum. This is no small contribution. They are fundamentals to energy forums which most people have been mistaken on since the beginning of the Internet. Some of you are still contradicting these truths directly and indirectly and are wasting everyone's time with your assumptions otherwise. I have not been given any credit for pointing these things out and have instead been subjected to coordinated personal attacks. Little if no retractions have been made by people who have contradicted these points which means thousands of posts have filled this thread based upon faulty assumptions that contradict these. Each person that continues to stand by their contradictions in these and related matters and is not willing to admit they have been fundamentally wrong is insincere and no doubt a troublemaker.

Hi Rick. All the false and misleading statements and deflections and excuses in the world will not
ever change the facts of the situation. Unless proper measurements or self-looping testing is done, then the
actual performance of any such setups remains unknown. The use of LED lights in such an arrangement is no
real practical help at all. If it is claimed that the LED lights are consuming about 1 Watt or more, then
there should be no reason that those LED lights can't be replaced with 1 to 3 Watt incandescent bulbs.
I have posted a weblink here to a web store which sells such small incandescent bulbs.

Resistance is futile... the truth will prevail. Only proper testing will show how these setups really perform.

P.S. If you or others are not making any claims about seeing more average power out than the average input power
with such a setup, then I don't understand what the point is here.
This is overunity.com, and this is an open source forum.

[rickfriedrich]

Take the time to type in "red herring fallacy" into google and see. This is what you continually do.

How can an image of YOUR POSTS be a "fallacy"?  Seek help, Rick.
Meanwhile, either demonstrate the truth of this claim, or admit that it is false:

[rickfriedrich]

Void,
I have addressed these points many times and again today. You of all people should not talk about proper LED measurements when you blundered so bad the other week. You need to come to grips with this still:
POINTS HAVING BEEN PROVEN SINCE JUNE 2019:
1. OU Claims and Disproof OU Claims Cannot be Proven Over Video, Pictures, and Words Over the Internet. People Can Only do Science and Prove Truths of Demonstration to Themselves In The Real World.
2. Forums Can Only Provide Information to Other People which Needs Personal Verification Unless it is Self-evident.
3. Free Energy and Over Unity Do Not Imply Self-running or Self-looping, while the Inverse is True.

Quote from: rickfriedrich on Today at 06:15:37 AM
"You guys are just against OU."
Hi Rick. That is just plain silly. Actually, members here who have a lot of experience at analyzing circuits have made it clear that without proper measurements there is just no way to really know how those circuits are actually performing. Really though, there should be no reason why these setups can't be self-looped, as that is a no nonsense test which separates the wheat from the chaff.

I can tell you this. If I had a setup which I thought was showing OU, I would 100% try to self-loop it.
I would do this because I am actually interested in knowing what the actual truth is. It really should be relatively simple to setup, and you have said yourself in one of your videos that self-looping your setup should be able to self-power your generator.

Any demonstration using LEDs and which does not at least show proper measurements is pretty much pointless. Is that really so hard for people to understand? It should really be self-evident here.