Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[TinselKoala]

Red,
You either have serious problems or are trying to pull another red herring!  I mean, I said your highlighting of my post's "you" words was a red herring because you diverted from the points I made. You once again posted something of no significance while diverting from important things mentioned in this ongoing debate. That is a red herring. And that is what you do.
The frequency generator point is also a red herring as we all admit it takes nothing to do that and a video was posted over a year ago doing that with the kit doing that.
So you have earned the name Red, for red herring fallacy man. This is what you do here.

Ah, but everything I have posted is directly relevant to the topic under discussion, which you might be able to see if you actually bothered to watch any of my videos. Other people have watched them and know exactly what I am talking about.  You can name-call and use ad-hominem fallacies all you like, but it will not change the uncomfortable fact that you cannot support your claims with valid demonstrations... and I can.

No, we don't all "admit" that it takes NOTHING to power your Function Generator, because it does not in fact take NOTHING to power it. And why don't you just post a link to that "video posted over a year ago" showing your Frequency Generator powered by one or several of your receiver coils, if that claim is true.
And now that you remind me... you also claimed that ZERO CURRENT was flowing during one of your demonstrations. But you cannot just use a charged capacitor to provide the voltage.... because current is in fact drawn and a cap will run down much faster than a battery would. So that is Yet Another bogus claim you have made without any support or even any attempt to demonstrate the truth of the claim. Because you cannot!

[Void]

Seaad made a claim of anomalous energy [post 1770 in this topic] ,it got bypassed here and I am bumping the spot where it first got posted ,seems a Thane Heinz derivative ,and if I am not mistaken
Seaad wrote here somewhere he has filed for a patent on this claim. [if I am wrong please correct me]
topic here https://overunity.com/17279/split-flux-transformer/msg537900/#msg537900
  Chet K

Hi Chet. I did see Seaad's comment earlier when he posted it, but unfortunately
I don't really have time to look into it myself. I have experimented with various different transformer
schemes in the past, although not this specific one, and did not see anything unusual in
my test results. I haven't tried this specific transformer arrangement previously however, so I can't say
how it might perform.

All the best...

[rickfriedrich]

Red,
The first thing you did in this exchange was post a video without explaining the relevance of it. Then you get all up in arms about me not watching your other videos. You go on the immediate attack without even knowing what I had shared. This looked really foolish and my drawing a few posts back captures the spirit of all that. Then you try and trap me with question. I saw through you the whole time Red. You really failed at what you were trying to do against me. So your presence here has been but a fiction reality. Why would I spend another moment looking at your videos when you behave this way here and don't even realize what a red herring fallacy means? And you keep asking us if your videos are OU or not. So either you are trying to trap people with games or don't know yourself. If you had an important video, why did you not just post it in all seriousness. Instead you played games with us the whole time. You have not shown yourself relevant when you do such things.
Maybe you are getting some of this after all. All videos cannot be proven to be real or to properly convey the entire environment and particulars to another person not physically present. So that is fiction in a sense. To someone without access it is like fiction. But just like a movie, you can get ideas to try at home in the real world. If you have provided useful information about OU research then that would be a good thing. But you have played so many games that I don't think very many people will take you seriously. Especially when you deny the very things you write only a few posts back. That's some serious problem Red. Yeah, you only approve of high value entertainment and think that amateurish and boring videos are automatically nothing. You would reject Faraday in his day. Like I said, you are overwhelmed with a fiction existence in cyberland and need to get back to reality.

You claim in your Red Herring graphic that my videos are "fictions". Yet everything in them is supported by demonstrations and checkable facts, and full information is provided for anyone to repeat what I've shown. Of course you would not know that since you have not watched them.

That is, my videos are not "fictions".... but yours definitely are, since nobody can reproduce what you claim, your information is incomplete, and your delivery is amateurish and boring.

Again, it is already demonstrated, and it makes no difference. I will share what I want when I have the time to do that. But why would it matter anyway. You don't believe any of this anyway. Like I wrote, if there was nothing important here you guys wouldn't be so consumed with all this and there wouldn't be 135,000 views here.

Now, are you going to demonstrate running your FG from the output of one or several receiver coils, or are you going to admit that that claim was a great FICTION and you cannot do it?

[rickfriedrich]

Red,
A fallacy is an error. You took on that name yourself by justifying it. I don't know your actual name anyway. I say all this in jest. You need to calm down and take it easy. This is after all, just an information sharing place. If you had something relevant, then you should have respectfully explained that rather than come back on here like a bulldozer and trickster as you did. You have not retracted anything you did in many many posts. So your work has zero relevance to me. Maybe if you took the time to tell people what you wish them to look at before you just demand that and insult people for not boosting up your view count and ego they may actually look.

So what is a valid demonstration Red? Something done over the internet? Are you still playing that game?

POINTS HAVING BEEN PROVEN SINCE JUNE 2019:
1. OU Claims and Disproof OU Claims Cannot be Proven Over Video, Pictures, and Words Over the Internet. People Can Only do Science and Prove Truths of Demonstration to Themselves In The Real World.
2. Forums Can Only Provide Information to Other People which Needs Personal Verification Unless it is Self-evident.
3. Free Energy and Over Unity Do Not Imply Self-running or Self-looping, while the Inverse is True.

Well the FG tiny input was not a concern until you pressed it and I don't take you seriously Red. I would have to take the time to look up that link and I can't be bothered at this time. If that is so important to you then I can see you are really given to red herrings. Every time I show you guys something minor like that you never acknowledge it anyway, and then just stomp on me more while making more demands. I can't prove anything over the internet anyway. You can do this very easily yourself. That is what this forum is about Red, confirming things for yourself. There is nothing special about that. Just connect a secondary coil to the input of the gate driver once it is started with the right frequency. Just don't have the coil too close as it may damage the gate driver (or put a resistor in series).

Whatever you mean in the last paragraph just amounts to a ramble. You are just getting yourself into a fit as it looks like. Not understanding what I wrote or said and then, as always, calling me bogus. Again, if I was just always bogus then you wouldn't be so interested would you? I think you are bogus so that is why I have no interest in your videos. So on the one hand many of you guys attack me as saying everything I do is bogus, but then you demand and beg for me to share more. I tell you I am not trying to prove anything but you judge me as if I am!  You write: "claim you have made without any support or even any attempt to demonstrate the truth of the claim." Again, I do support and demonstrate my claims in the real world in person. But you expect that through a video, which is absurd. The game is up man. It is busted for good. It's been settled since June now. The trolls have lost all their power because of that. Sitting behind a computer screen and opinionizing just doesn't have any more appeal when the realists expose that child's play.

Ah, but everything I have posted is directly relevant to the topic under discussion, which you might be able to see if you actually bothered to watch any of my videos. Other people have watched them and know exactly what I am talking about.  You can name-call and use ad-hominem fallacies all you like, but it will not change the uncomfortable fact that you cannot support your claims with valid demonstrations... and I can.

No, we don't all "admit" that it takes NOTHING to power your Function Generator, because it does not in fact take NOTHING to power it. And why don't you just post a link to that "video posted over a year ago" showing your Frequency Generator powered by one or several of your receiver coils, if that claim is true.
And now that you remind me... you also claimed that ZERO CURRENT was flowing during one of your demonstrations. But you cannot just use a charged capacitor to provide the voltage.... because current is in fact drawn and a cap will run down much faster than a battery would. So that is Yet Another bogus claim you have made without any support or even any attempt to demonstrate the truth of the claim. Because you cannot!

[ramset]

Void ..I have rebooted the topic over here  https://overunity.com/17279/split-flux-transformer/msg537909/#new
and for clarity there are MANY who have played with this Thane type solid state device.
will be connecting with as many as possible ,I must admit I am stupified  by the idea that you can't teach on the internet ...I had no idea....

maybe somebody should let the world know ??

sounds fishy to me ??

at the topic I linked to is an example of a man who wants to teach/share and what that looks like ?
I'll make a bet he will answer every question as best he can to any builder who shows up !!