Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[Jeg]

Void AG was interested in showing us these two videos and JB's video 7 but the second video is important
I suggest you make a point in watching it.

Hi Ray
At second video we see more a missunderstanding than a secret. If JB was right then at sea level there would be no opposition from the coil after collapse. Meaning there would be no inductive kickback at zero level which is wrong. 

ps. To take it a little further, what about in a deep hole below sea level? Will the coil augment instead of opposing? I don't think so.

[Raycathode]

here is a scope shot of my wave form my test circuit. PS i claim no originality for Nelsons idea and help

thanks Nelson.

Jeg you certainly come top of the class in levity,  it's very basic science.

I would have thought the battery idea electrons are shifted in are different (ignoring holes).
why you dig so deep ?   

I was getting over 600 volts till i started de tuning it with a smaller coil it charges the 4.7uf cap instantaneously almost!
it's lethal and gives RF burns.

[Jeg]

Jeg what has a deep hole to do with don't tell me you been to the lido centre in Koln 

Hey Ray
I thought you were speaking about JB's idea that as we go up in height the inductive kickback grows up. He said he tested that at 2500ft and he saw an increasement due to the elevation difference from sea surface. But the reference of his coil was also at 2500 ft and not at the sea level...

What are you actually showing with your scope shot?

[Void]

Itsu doesn't waste his time or ours by making false claims he cannot support with evidence. You do.
That makes you a LIAR, Rick. And nobody can believe anything that a proven LIAR says, unless it is
supported by valid evidence.

Hi TK, Yes, RF has shown himself to be very dishonest IMO. He implies or claims OU in various videos of his,
but never backs it up with any sort of reasonable demonstration which employs proper measurements
or which is self-looped. He then attacks and insults people here who merely point this out,  and has
been regularly spamming this thread as well now.



Some people may be wondering why RF has been attacking John Bedini.
John Bedini used to have a webpage (not sure if that webpage is still up) which documented how RF
and a couple others conspired together behind John's back to try to steal the design details of a little
transistor oscillator John had made with a tiny blocking oscillator soldered right inside the transistor case,
which they thought John was claiming/implying was over unity. John found out about how those guys
took one of those transistor devices apart and sent details of the schematic to each
other in email behind John's back. Also, in later years John Bedini released a statement
that RF had been selling John's proprietary technology without John's permission as well.
Since then RF has been attacking John.   

BTW, RF keeps spamming a picture here from a test I did which showed that LED lights can light very 
brightly even while consuming only about 60mW. Anyone with even a basic knowledge of reading meters would
realize that a digital ammeter which only reads to two decimal places will display 0.01 for currents
from 0.01A all the way up to just under 0.02A. Even though this was explained to RF, he either
still can't understand such a basic concept, or because he is very dishonest he implies that
the meter is reading incorrectly. 

I do feel bad for the people with little understanding of RF's history and little understanding of electronics
which RF has been stringing along with all this sort of nonsense. This is why I am speaking out against this guy.
Much of what RF says here or in his videos is clearly nonsense, and that is why people here with a good understanding
of electronics have been pointing this out here.

I truly hope Stefan's friend has a burden for his planet and the people here
you Rick play as a God ..and try to tell me its Dark outside when I'm standing in sunshine..
and people die while you Fiddle. and you can take that to the bank !!

Hi Ramset. The chances for any OU claim being false is probably at least 99%, it seems.
RF has been talking a lot of nonsense here when asked if he can back
up any of his claims with a reasonable demo, so realistically the odds are probably
even worse for any of RF's claims. I wouldn't advise anyone to hold their breath
waiting for RF to ever back up any of his claims in any sort of reasonable way.

Chances are Stefan's friend is not going to fare so well if he tries his tests with
small incandescent bulbs instead of LED lights, and if he tries to self-loop his setup.


All the best...

Edit: Here is the link to the John Bedini webpage I am referring to:
http://www.johnbedini.net/john34/history.htm

[Raycathode]

Hey Ray
I thought you were speaking about JB's idea that as we go up in height the inductive kickback grows up. He said he tested that at 2500ft and he saw an increasement due to the elevation difference from sea surface. But the reference of his coil was also at 2500 ft and not at the sea level...

What are you actually showing with your scope shot?

scope shot
Driver is CD4047 with squ wave output driven into MosFet electrons self excited for peek BEMF
DC draw 11.5v 142 ma  is it OU ?  Nein, aber es kann die Scheiße eines Oszilloskops schlagen, if go the wrong side of the dc-dc!