Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[ramset]

 Ray
exactly what do you want to see
A free fan hack ??
A motor doing what..?..running a light bulb or  putting a small charge into a battery while using less power ?
Would you like to see a free hack to turn your oscilloscope from a $500  scope into $1000 scope on the Internet ...would you like to be taught that for free on the internet ?


Would you like to be taught how to use your PC as an oscilloscope ...spectrum analyzer on and on for free on the internet
or would you like to hack your car and get much more gas mileage
is that the kind of free ....energy we're talking about ?



If you don't want to see YouTube hacks ?? please be more specific ...do you want free energy or do you want over unity ...seems the distinction has now been made .
Waiting for Stefan's  friend....

[tinman]

Well it pointless arguing. What I want to see is a build of the device of the motor that really works.
By saying 'works' i mean that in good faith either from any of you guru's here as I want start getting into a build.

Oh and Please no joke junk stuff stuff of youtube  it's not nice,

Raymondo

There are no self running motors that have been proven to work.
If you want free energy,buy some solar panels.

In saying that,i am still in pursuit of the impossible.
One of two things will happen--
1- i will succeed
2-i will die trying

But first we need a clean path to follow,and the cleanup starts by getting rid of fraudsters like Rick,Aaron,and the likes. They contaminate actual research with there snake oil sale's pitches,and give good people bad names--like they are doing to the works of Tesla.
Nothing they do is related to Tesla's work,they just use his name to try and make there garbage sound good--which it is not.

People like Rick take other people's work,and call it there own.
If you look at Rick's !loving path! circuit,and his fan setup,it is identical to Imhotep's fan charger from over 12 years ago,and the circuit is the same as bedini used in his SSG.
None of these snake oil salesmen have anything of there own,they just take-rename,and sell others work-->and under false pretenses.

The best thing you could do is build the simple SSG and go from there.
Make slight modifications,and see which one improves the efficiency.
This is where i started,and went on from there.

Here is a replication of one of my circuits(the twin BEMF circuit i designed many years ago)
Lets see Rick show one of his motors charging both the run and charge battery at the same time.
So many things buried in the past that need to be revisited.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HwUuPQn2W8&list=FLsLiBC2cL5GsZGLcj2rm-4w&index=78&t=0s


Brad


Brad

[rickfriedrich]

Brad,
If I am funny by pointing out how silly you are then I accept the compliment. 
Nice complete evasion of everything I wrote! Your response is entirely that it is "fancy talk." Impressive Brad. You just repeat your denials which is what I expected. You don't realize that your responses are always just fallacies. Or maybe you do.

What is "whacked out" in showing how you can make billions of fans more efficient and produce more output? Your rejection of the most obvious thing here shows how prejudiced you are. You can't even grant one point because you are so filled with hatred.

Now remember, this fan demo is in the greater context of saying that it is the least beneficial circuit option--it is just a basic sample of what is possible.

A very small gain is nevertheless a gain Brad.

This is about the funniest sentence on this forum so far:
"You may think your smart with your word's,but there is no substance to anything you say at all,so your fancy talk is just a waste of your time."
Wow! You really took the time to properly spell, use correct grammar and type out that one! And it is actually your post here that has "no substance to anything you say at all". Incredible. You are only proving my points here Brad.

Brad, I sell things that people beg for. I don't go around advertising. My customers refer others to me. I often spend many hours talking to people for free. I have free websites offering free material since the beginning of the internet. I have put up books and thousands of pages of historical information for free. And before that I gave away the information to people in print and on disks. I have paid for these libraries and websites myself. But people have asked for specific products and so I offered them. I didn't come here with products to push. I have shared raw information that does not require products from me. I have made many things open source. I don't sell things based upon lies, but based upon what Tesla taught, and what the top electrodynamicists of history have taught. You mock that as "fancy words" because you are limited to very crude high school level electronics. I can't help that you try and oversimplify everything. I'm trying to make it simple enough.

I'm not making money from you Brad. I am selling to people who ask. But I am showing everyone how to do this for free. I am paying with my own time and free websites for people to have this free information. I have a few items for sale as I have to live just like you have to make a living. If people didn't want this then I wouldn't be doing this. Obviously it is important enough that you are obsessed with it and are desperate to silence me. Just look at yourself for a minute. Go back to your previous apologies and consider what you have already said after you put your foot in your mouth foolishly. You have some serious problems Brad. It's obvious to everyone that you really don't believe these words you are saying. If it was so obvious that I was wrong then there would not be close to 150,000 views on this thread that have mostly happened in the last 2 months. You wouldn't be spending so much time on this if it wasn't important. Yet you never address any of the important points that I make, you just sweep everything away in one big red herring fallacy.

You just don't get the basic point. If you get more out than what is thought possible, then that is practically free gain. Pretty simple Brad. You assume the gain is from the primary input. Just because that input made the motor action, and is a trigger for the secondary action in charging a battery, doesn't mean that energy came from that primary input. That is the point in debate here. You just argued in a circle saying it is. The energy from the input is already accounted for in the motor action and the regular circuit losses. My point is that when we add the loving path loop then more energy appears that is useful under the circumstances. You say that it was already there. In some sense yes, but it wasn't manifesting because it was suppressed in a way. It was deliberately shorted out. We can all agree that what I have done in this is an improvement. But you will never want to admit that. And that is my main point.

The deeper point is that this is just a tiny taste of Tesla's shuttle circuit engineering that Barrett pointed out in 1991. For your information, he applied that very engineering in his very important patent:

Oscillator-shuttle-circuit (OSC) networks for conditioning energy in higher-order symmetry algebraic topological forms and RF phase conjugation
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5493691A/

"The present invention is in the spirit of Tesla's outlook on electromagnetics. Tesla's approach to electrical engineering addresses and accents primarily the inductive-reactive part of electromagnetic field-matter interactions, rather than the resistive part. His approach is more comparable with the physics of nonlinear optics and many-body systems than with that of the single-body systems of current electrical engineering. The Tesla approach is fundamentally a nonlinear many-body approach and may be contrasted with the approach of mainstream electrical engineering, both linear and nonlinear. The nonlinear aspects of mainstream electrical engineering are based on feedback in the resistive field, whereas the nonlinearity in Tesla's approach is based on coupled inductive oscillators using to-and-fro shuttling of energy to and from isolated capacitative stores through non-circuit elements attached to conventional circuits. These network arrangements, which are called oscillator-shuttle-circuit networks herein, or OSC networks (Barrett, 1991), result in adiabatic nonlinearities in complete oscillator-shuttle-circuit systems."

This was is along the same lines as another he filed at the same time as the groundbreaking ultrawideband radar patent:
Active signalling systems
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5486833A/en

I have shown who sponsored him in his latest book on Resonance Radar last week. These are top level advanced processes Brad. You are acting like and are at a high school level. Grow up and admit and consider the existing technology like this. Again, I am just trying to do the most basic thing to bring this to your attention. If I don't start at this level then how are you going to appreciate the very complicated systems? Again, you are upset not because of the reasons you give, but because you want more output than this simple fan demo. And that is understandable. But if you can't appreciate a little gain then you will not be open to more. And you will not get how this all works. So go read the groundwork patent from Barrett and tell me that he is some fool that misrepresented Tesla and tell me why the big companies and DoD thinks otherwise. When you humble yourself maybe you may benefit from trying to understand the principles here. Then you will get what I have been doing for 15 years now. Let me know when you sincerely do that and I'll be here to help you.

I have to ask Rick,are you also a comedian ? ,as you really have some whacked out idea's.
What i  mean is--you are good for a laugh 
But anyway,lets clarify for those here.
You make a video,where within the first couple of minutes you claim to be showing a free energy !fan!. Your idea of free energy is being able to draw a very small amount of energy from the fan without it effecting the speed at which the fan is rotating,or the amount of work the fan is doing,all while the P/in remains the same--right?.
This is why i was asking if you were also a comedian 
You may think your smart with your word's,but there is no substance to anything you say at all,so your fancy talk is just a waste of your time. The reason i dislike bedeni,Aaron,and now you,is because you try and sell stuff based on lies. You claim to have free energy machine's,and Overunity machine's,but you don't --you lie,just as bedini and Aaron do,all in the name of making a dollar from those less aware of your agenda.
You lie in your video's,as you have not once shown a free energy device or an OU device.
You say in your video on the fan that it is free energy,but you know as well as anyone that the !so called! free energy comes from the source the fan is running from. You think because you have increased the efficiency of that fan motor(which we have no way of knowing if you have or have not,as your measurements are just plain rubbish),that the small amount of energy being drawn from it to charge a 12v battery is free  . Well the bad news for you is-->it is not free,it was supplied to the fan motor by the source-->your power supply. On top of that,you have no idea as to how efficient your fan is,you have no accurate P/in measurements,and there was nothing hooked up to the charging battery other than a volt meter-->you have to be kidding,right?.
[Bla, Bla, Bla.]

[tinman]

Brad,
If I am funny by pointing out how silly you are then I accept the compliment. 
Nice complete evasion of everything I wrote! Your response is entirely that it is "fancy talk." Impressive Brad. You just repeat your denials which is what I expected. You don't realize that your responses are always just fallacies. Or maybe you do.

What is "whacked out" in showing how you can make billions of fans more efficient and produce more output? Your rejection of the most obvious thing here shows how prejudiced you are. You can't even grant one point because you are so filled with hatred.

Now remember, this fan demo is in the greater context of saying that it is the least beneficial circuit option--it is just a basic sample of what is possible.

A very small gain is nevertheless a gain Brad.

This is about the funniest sentence on this forum so far:
"You may think your smart with your word's,but there is no substance to anything you say at all,so your fancy talk is just a waste of your time."
Wow! You really took the time to properly spell, use correct grammar and type out that one! And it is actually your post here that has "no substance to anything you say at all". Incredible. You are only proving my points here Brad.

Brad, I sell things that people beg for. I don't go around advertising. My customers refer others to me. I often spend many hours talking to people for free. I have free websites offering free material since the beginning of the internet. I have put up books and thousands of pages of historical information for free. And before that I gave away the information to people in print and on disks. I have paid for these libraries and websites myself. But people have asked for specific products and so I offered them. I didn't come here with products to push. I have shared raw information that does not require products from me. I have made many things open source. I don't sell things based upon lies, but based upon what Tesla taught, and what the top electrodynamicists of history have taught. You mock that as "fancy words" because you are limited to very crude high school level electronics. I can't help that you try and oversimplify everything. I'm trying to make it simple enough.

I'm not making money from you Brad. I am selling to people who ask. But I am showing everyone how to do this for free. I am paying with my own time and free websites for people to have this free information. I have a few items for sale as I have to live just like you have to make a living. If people didn't want this then I wouldn't be doing this. Obviously it is important enough that you are obsessed with it and are desperate to silence me. Just look at yourself for a minute. Go back to your previous apologies and consider what you have already said after you put your foot in your mouth foolishly. You have some serious problems Brad. It's obvious to everyone that you really don't believe these words you are saying. If it was so obvious that I was wrong then there would not be close to 150,000 views on this thread that have mostly happened in the last 2 months. You wouldn't be spending so much time on this if it wasn't important. Yet you never address any of the important points that I make, you just sweep everything away in one big red herring fallacy.

You just don't get the basic point. If you get more out than what is thought possible, then that is practically free gain. Pretty simple Brad. You assume the gain is from the primary input. Just because that input made the motor action, and is a trigger for the secondary action in charging a battery, doesn't mean that energy came from that primary input. That is the point in debate here. You just argued in a circle saying it is. The energy from the input is already accounted for in the motor action and the regular circuit losses. My point is that when we add the loving path loop then more energy appears that is useful under the circumstances. You say that it was already there. In some sense yes, but it wasn't manifesting because it was suppressed in a way. It was deliberately shorted out. We can all agree that what I have done in this is an improvement. But you will never want to admit that. And that is my main point.

The deeper point is that this is just a tiny taste of Tesla's shuttle circuit engineering that Barrett pointed out in 1991. For your information, he applied that very engineering in his very important patent:

Oscillator-shuttle-circuit (OSC) networks for conditioning energy in higher-order symmetry algebraic topological forms and RF phase conjugation
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5493691A/

"The present invention is in the spirit of Tesla's outlook on electromagnetics. Tesla's approach to electrical engineering addresses and accents primarily the inductive-reactive part of electromagnetic field-matter interactions, rather than the resistive part. His approach is more comparable with the physics of nonlinear optics and many-body systems than with that of the single-body systems of current electrical engineering. The Tesla approach is fundamentally a nonlinear many-body approach and may be contrasted with the approach of mainstream electrical engineering, both linear and nonlinear. The nonlinear aspects of mainstream electrical engineering are based on feedback in the resistive field, whereas the nonlinearity in Tesla's approach is based on coupled inductive oscillators using to-and-fro shuttling of energy to and from isolated capacitative stores through non-circuit elements attached to conventional circuits. These network arrangements, which are called oscillator-shuttle-circuit networks herein, or OSC networks (Barrett, 1991), result in adiabatic nonlinearities in complete oscillator-shuttle-circuit systems."

This was is along the same lines as another he filed at the same time as the groundbreaking ultrawideband radar patent:
Active signalling systems
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5486833A/en

I have shown who sponsored him in his latest book on Resonance Radar last week. These are top level advanced processes Brad. You are acting like and are at a high school level. Grow up and admit and consider the existing technology like this. Again, I am just trying to do the most basic thing to bring this to your attention. If I don't start at this level then how are you going to appreciate the very complicated systems? Again, you are upset not because of the reasons you give, but because you want more output than this simple fan demo. And that is understandable. But if you can't appreciate a little gain then you will not be open to more. And you will not get how this all works. So go read the groundwork patent from Barrett and tell me that he is some fool that misrepresented Tesla and tell me why the big companies and DoD thinks otherwise. When you humble yourself maybe you may benefit from trying to understand the principles here. Then you will get what I have been doing for 15 years now. Let me know when you sincerely do that and I'll be here to help you.

It is good to see that you finally admit that you are only making a slight improvement in efficiency,and not making free energy as you have been claiming to.

What you now must understand is that even though you might make a slight gain in efficiency,you are still running at a loss. These are the things you should be telling people,not that they can make free energy.

But in saying that,you would be better off just buying a top end fan,and saving even more energy,due to there higher efficiency.

But the record is straight--you admit to only making a slight improvement in efficiency,and not making free energy.

Now,how about your claims of having overunity machines ?
Are you going to set the record straight there as well-->it would be the right thing to do.


Brad

[rickfriedrich]

Brad,
How do you know this? Proven to who? You really believe that you know everything and are the judge of everything? You are only working at high school level electronics.

The problem with you Brad is you are confused. On the one hand you are certain of the conventional theory and insist upon under unity dynamics but then you hope that you can experience the impossible. So then why are you so aggressive? If you were not so full of hatred then maybe you could actually learn something.

Again, prove to us that you understand Tesla at all. You don't obviously. It is easy to say something, but you back up nothing. You are just a troll that hides behind your ignorance.

The fan came from me 14 years ago. Bedini did the tape motor drive model and I improved upon it and made the fan. Others copied that. We did a video together in 2006 after I had shown those fans to over 100,000 people the years before.

The circuit is not entirely the same as the SSG so you don't know again.

It is true that Bedini didn't invent the SSG type of circuits. I realize that now and I have exposed him for claiming to be more than what he was. That is old news Brad. Everyone builds upon the work of others. I give credit to everyone I know to have contributed.

So you attack the SSG type circuit and claims and now you refer people to it.  Wow!

Then you show a video just because you are mentioned in it. You assume you figured that end part the first time. But we did all these options years before. Some of that goes back to the 80s as well. But here you are taking credit for something that others did before you. Maybe you figured it out by yourself, but it just goes to show that if you attack someone in your ignorance you may find out that you are the guilty one for your own violation.

But why post a video like that and not attack the guy like you do me? You have some very preliminary readings from a guy with a very crude motor (which is fine as I have made many like that myself early on). You have a double standard Brad. If I quote all the attacks you hurled against me for showing similar things how do you account for that?

Now tell us if this guy really had that be a self-runner in the long run. That is not the proper way to make that system self-run. I talk to thousands of these kinds of guys over the years. I get all the details and try and help them out. We all learn from each other.

I have already shown videos where the run battery remains at the same place for an hour while running the motor and powering significant loads. Here is one that demonstrates exactly what I was mentioning here in 2015 that you attack me about:

https://youtu.be/6he58A5xTIQ

There are other videos as well. I have shown these motors running at many of my meetings over two days where the batteries stay charged. Same batteries I have used for years (with old date stamps), so they are not ruined either.

There is a proper and improper way of self-charging. The first point of my company is to ensure battery longevity. So any method of self-charging that damages or degrades the batteries (such as in solar controllers) is avoided. For what is the point if you damage the battery and make it some consumable. That was one of the main reasons I rejected Bedini because he was a battery killer. The Tesla switch can be over unity self-running, but it will kill the batteries. The only way to do that is with high frequency or using capacitors like Benitez 100 years ago.
So you have to look at the batteries over more than just a few minutes, cycles, or months to properly judge the results. It takes years to determine the effects on batteries. That is what I do. But batteries are not necessary, and neither are motors. But they are easy to see these things with, and everyone has them.

There are no self running motors that have been proven to work.
If you want free energy,buy some solar panels.
In saying that,i am still in pursuit of the impossible.
One of two things will happen--
1- i will succeed
2-i will die trying
But first we need a clean path to follow,and the cleanup starts by getting rid of fraudsters like Rick,Aaron,and the likes. They contaminate actual research with there snake oil sale's pitches,and give good people bad names--like they are doing to the works of Tesla.
Nothing they do is related to Tesla's work,they just use his name to try and make there garbage sound good--which it is not.
People like Rick take other people's work,and call it there own.
If you look at Rick's !loving path! circuit,and his fan setup,it is identical to Imhotep's fan charger from over 12 years ago,and the circuit is the same as bedini used in his SSG.
None of these snake oil salesmen have anything of there own,they just take-rename,and sell others work-->and under false pretenses.
The best thing you could do is build the simple SSG and go from there.
Make slight modifications,and see which one improves the efficiency.
This is where i started,and went on from there.
Here is a replication of one of my circuits(the twin BEMF circuit i designed many years ago)
Lets see Rick show one of his motors charging both the run and charge battery at the same time.
So many things buried in the past that need to be revisited.
Brad