Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Negative Inductance and measure of Magnetic force.

Started by synchro1, November 19, 2017, 08:20:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

synchro1

I ran a second test with 8 ceramic discs on the lower stack and am generating a steady 8 A.C. volts out of the electro-magnet. My input is 12 D.C. volts at 1.5 amps. I'll check the amperage on my next test. This is not BEMF recovery. The lower oscillating magnet stack still has the potential to generate output as well.

synchro1

Compare the diameters of these two Electro-magnets. The core of the 500 Newton coil on the left is merely 50% greater at 3/4" then the 50 Newton coil on the right at 1/2". Isn't it interesting that they develop that much difference in attraction strength with the same input current?

The masking oscillator generates power in proportion to the magnetic force of it's backing magnets. It's curious that we can control greater amounts at no increased cost to input power.

synchro1

Second potentiometer.

I wired a second 10K potentiometer in series with the 100K potentiometer and managed to lower the commutator fan R.P.M. down to around a Hertz.

I slowed the rotor for the second test by applying pressure to the fan rotor with my index finger. I also had the DMM wrongfully positioned on the D.C. setting. I'm certain my second output reading of 8 A.C. volts was accurate. That amounted to 2/3 of the input voltage. That's a whopping amount of recovery percentage from the primary EM coil. I'm currently testing for amperage.

My theory predicts a 100% chance of going OU with this configuration.

synchro1

Here's a video of the elastic spring oscillator controlled by the "Reed switch commutator":


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9sSk9MwJok

synchro1

Art Porter's solid state GAP generator is powered by an A.C. sine wave inverted from a D.C. power source and controlled by a commutator. The positive and negative polarities of the A.C current serve to amplify and neutralize the permanent magnet fields that sandwich his primary coil. Hob Nilre has demonstrated conclusively that weight in copper increases magnetic field strength in an air core power coils with the same input current. Art's coil induction is balanced to mask the attraction gauss of his Neo disc magnets. It's not hard to visualize where the break even and over unity COP line would appear. We can calculate it with a high degree of scientific accuracy. Art's measurements demonstrate that the neutralization side of the A.C. sine wave delivers more output than the amplification one. My simple two switch commutator delivers a D.C neutralization pulse and recovers output. The setup works fine. Winding a larger copper coil with sufficent weight in copper to mask the attraction of my two large Neo disks at a predetermined input would result in a predictable over unity COP when driven by my two switch commutator. This conclusion is inescapable.